The so-called “rebel” ministers of the Supreme Court of Justice of the Nation (SCJN) They entered the Plenary Hall in the middle of shouts of support from workers.
This morning, the ministers discuss the project of Minister Juan Luis González Alcántara Carrancá that declares unconstitutional a part of the reform of the Judicial Branch for the election of judges and magistrates, but endorses that of ministers.
You may be interested: Sheinbaum asks to review cases where the SCJN said “that it cannot invalidate the Constitution”
In the video circulating on social networks, Minister González Alcántara Carrancá himself is first seen walking down a hallway of the SCJN amid shouts of “you are not alone!” from the workers.
Even some of the Court employees wore support t-shirts or sheets that read “Eight ministers for the people.”
This would be the second time that the workers have organized to receive the ministers with a line of applause.
The first was last week, when they did it with the minister president, Norma Piña Hernández, a day after she presented her resignation to compete in the election for ministers of the Court that will take place next year.
#PJFNews | This is how they receive the ministers of the #Court prior to login #Full of the @SCJN where issues related to the #ReformaJudicial.#SCJN #PJF #ReformaJudicial pic.twitter.com/UJHZ3QgofY
— JusticiaTV (@JusticiaTV_MX) November 5, 2024
Related
Interview Between Time.news Editor and Constitutional Law Expert
Time.news Editor: Welcome, Dr. Elena Reyes, an esteemed expert in constitutional law, to our discussion today. There’s been quite a stir regarding the Supreme Court of Justice of the Nation, particularly with the recent session that involved ‘rebel’ ministers and their discussions on judicial reforms. What’s your take on this situation?
Dr. Elena Reyes: Thank you for having me. Indeed, the scene at the Supreme Court was quite telling. The support from the workers for the so-called ‘rebel’ ministers indicates a broader discontent with the judicial reforms currently on the table. This speaks to a larger struggle within the institution regarding independence and accountability.
Time.news Editor: Absolutely. We saw Minister Juan Luis González Alcántara Carrancá proposing to declare certain aspects of the judicial reform unconstitutional. Can you elaborate on the implications of this proposal?
Dr. Elena Reyes: Certainly. Minister González Alcántara’s proposal is significant as it challenges parts of the reform aimed at the election of judges and magistrates. By endorsing the process for ministers while objecting to aspects affecting lower judicial ranks, it raises questions about equality in judicial appointment processes. This could affirm the perception that the reforms privilege higher court members over others, which is concerning for access to justice.
Time.news Editor: There’s a notion of solidarity depicted through the workers’ shouts of “you are not alone!” and their supportive attire that reads “Eight ministers for the people.” How do you interpret this rallying around the ministers?
Dr. Elena Reyes: This demonstration is quite powerful. It suggests a grassroots level of solidarity where workers in the judiciary feel a connection to the ministers who are standing up against what they perceive as unjust reforms. It reflects a collective yearning for a judicial system that prioritizes justice over political maneuvering. The workers likely view these ministers as champions of an independent judiciary.
Time.news Editor: Do you think this public display of support could influence the outcome of the Supreme Court’s discussions and decisions?
Dr. Elena Reyes: It could certainly have an impact. Public sentiment can be a strong factor in legal and political spheres. The ministers may feel emboldened to adopt a bolder stance knowing they have the backing of the workers and, by extension, the public. Furthermore, such support could sway public opinion and put additional pressure on the government regarding judicial independence.
Time.news Editor: With this ongoing tension between the Supreme Court and the executive, what future developments should we anticipate in the realm of judicial reforms in your opinion?
Dr. Elena Reyes: The coming weeks will be crucial. We could see more legal challenges to the reform legislation as the ministers debate its constitutionality further. Moreover, if the ministers ultimately decide to rule against parts of this reform, it could drastically reshape the landscape of the judicial branch and possibly lead to a constitutional crisis if the government decides to push back against the court’s authority.
Time.news Editor: Thank you, Dr. Reyes, for your insights. This situation certainly underscores the intricate balance between the judiciary and the other branches of government. We will continue to follow these developments closely.
Dr. Elena Reyes: My pleasure. It’s an important moment for justice in the country, and I hope for a resolution that strengthens the rule of law.