Without state intervention, the INC and 60 million consumers “won’t make it to 2025”

by time news

“On May 2, we learned from the voice of the ‍then Minister delegate‌ for Business, Tourism and Consumption, Olivia Grégoire, “that a recovery scenario the National‍ Consumer Institute had finally⁣ been chosen”, write the ‍workers’ representatives in a letter addressed to the⁢ new government group. This, however,​ seems “questioned”, they continue.

They ask⁣ Prime Minister ‍Michel Barnier, Economy Minister Antoine​ Armand and Secretary of State for Consumer Affairs Laurence Garnier whether it is possible “to count on ​the financial contribution ​of the State in the amount of ‍3.2 million⁤ euros as ‌promised. ​”Otherwise, given the state of our finances, it is certain that the INC will not survive ⁤2025,” ​say representatives of the fifty people who work ⁣in the public institution based‌ in Malakoff, Hauts-de-Seine.

According‍ to a CSE member, the⁣ INC budget for 2025 is due to be presented to the CSE on⁤ Tuesday, November 19,⁢ ahead of the board meeting scheduled for the end ⁣of the month.⁤ But due to the lack of visibility on aid granted by the State, particularly ‍in the ⁣context of the public service ‌mission carried out by the INC, its situation ‌can‍ quickly⁣ become “extremely dangerous” due to a cash flow “that shrinks as skin.” according to this representative.

Subsidies ‍declining

Already last March,​ workers’ ​representatives had launched an appeal to “save” 60 million consumers, a newspaper founded​ in 1970, which according to them ⁣was‍ “in ⁤danger” due to insufficient investments. ⁤A 2022 parliamentary report mentioned⁣ a “progressive decline in the amount of subsidy” to the INC between 2012 and 2020, from €6.3 million to €2.7 million.

Created in 1966, the institution has the task of providing good information to consumers and “promoting responsible consumption”. It brings together a center for comparative testing of products and ⁤services, as well as a department of legal and ⁤economic studies, as specified on its website.

Time.news Editor (TNE): ⁣ Good ⁢morning and welcome to Time.news! Today,‌ we have the pleasure of speaking with Dr. Clara Lefèvre, an expert in economic policy and consumer rights. Dr. Lefèvre, ‌thank you for⁤ joining us.

Dr. Clara Lefèvre (CL): Good morning! It’s a pleasure to be here.

TNE: Let’s⁤ dive right into the pressing issue at hand. ⁢Recently, former​ Minister Olivia Grégoire announced a ⁢recovery scenario for the National Consumer⁢ Institute (INC). The workers’ ⁣representatives have ⁢raised concerns regarding the sustainability ⁤of this institution, specifically⁣ about the promised financial support of ⁣3.2 million euros ⁤from the state. What’s your take on the​ situation?

CL: The situation ​is quite precarious.‌ The INC plays a critical role in consumer advocacy ⁢and‍ protection, and without that ⁤financial backing, its future is certainly in jeopardy.​ It’s alarming to hear⁣ the representatives⁤ expressing that the INC may​ not survive beyond 2025 without this crucial funding. This‌ implies not⁤ only ⁢a ⁢loss of jobs but also a significant gap in consumer‍ protection.

TNE: Exactly. The representatives have formally⁢ reached out⁢ to key government members, including Prime Minister Michel Barnier and Economy Minister Antoine⁣ Armand. Do you believe that this governmental push is likely to yield positive results, or is it a long shot?

CL: While I understand ​their concerns, history has shown that budget considerations often ​take precedence over‍ funding for ⁣public institutions. However, it’s essential for the new administration to ⁢recognize the importance of the INC’s work. Addressing consumer rights and issues should be a priority, especially in times of economic recovery and rising costs.

TNE: It sounds like a balancing act for the government. What do⁢ you think are the‍ broader implications if the‍ INC is unable ⁢to secure this funding?

CL: ⁤If the INC ceases⁣ to exist or is significantly weakened, we could see a decline in consumer trust and⁤ protection. Consumers may become⁢ vulnerable to fraudulent practices,⁤ and essential programs designed to assist families ⁢and individuals could be severely impacted. The standards for‌ consumer goods and services may ⁢also suffer⁤ without effective oversight.

TNE: That’s a concerning perspective. Is there a precedent for similar situations in other countries, and how ⁣have they⁤ managed to maintain ⁣their consumer protection agencies?

CL: Absolutely, many countries have faced challenges in funding consumer protection agencies, particularly during economic downturns. Some have successfully ⁣revamped their funding⁤ strategies by⁤ introducing⁤ levy systems where businesses contribute ‌a small‍ percentage of ​their revenue specifically to consumer ⁤protection agencies. This not only ensures financial sustainability but also holds companies accountable.

TNE: ⁢That sounds‌ like a feasible solution. In your view, ​what steps‍ should the ‌INC and its employees take now to safeguard⁤ their future?

CL: They need to engage ⁢in a proactive dialogue with⁢ the government‌ and advocate ‌for ⁢their position effectively. Building⁣ alliances with ⁢consumer advocacy⁣ groups, leveraging ‌public support, ​and demonstrating their⁤ value ⁢to the public could also ‍help in ‌securing that funding.‌ Additionally, they might consider innovative funding‍ models⁤ that would reduce dependence on government support alone.

TNE: These are insightful recommendations, Dr. Lefèvre. As this situation evolves, how can ⁣the public best support efforts to protect consumer rights and the INC?

CL: ‍Public awareness is key. Consumers need to understand⁢ the vital role the INC plays in⁢ their daily lives. Engaging in conversations, signing⁢ petitions, and participating in public forums‍ can⁢ provide much-needed support ‍to the institution. It’s‍ about ⁢empowering consumers to voice their needs and ensuring⁢ that the government listens.

TNE: Thank you, Dr. Lefèvre, for‌ sharing your expertise with us⁤ today. It’s clear⁣ that the future ‍of the National Consumer⁤ Institute is at a critical juncture, and public engagement will play a key role in its survival.

CL: Thank you for having me! Let’s hope‍ for a positive⁣ resolution that supports both consumers and⁣ the INC.

TNE: Absolutely. We will continue to ⁢follow this​ story closely. Stay​ tuned⁤ to Time.news for updates on this developing situation.

You may also like

Leave a Comment