2024-06-19 02:22:49
On Tuesday, the Vilnius District Court docket continued to look at the case of S. Dmitrijev because of doable abuse, possession of a cast doc and fraud.
On this case, expenses have additionally been filed in opposition to S. Dmitrijeva’s spouse, N. Dmitrijeva. She is accused of falsifying paperwork, acquiring overseas property by deception (fraud), aiding in abuse of workplace and fraudulent administration of economic accounting.
In keeping with regulation enforcement information, within the years 2019-2023, S. Dmitrijev had concluded a probably fictitious lease settlement for non-residential premises for workplace lease with a personal firm managed by his partner, during which allegedly unfaithful information was recorded.
On Tuesday, the witnesses interviewed in court docket stated that they visited S. Dmitrijev’s workplace, which, in accordance with them, was within the capital, on Skroblu Road.
The witness, Vladimir Blizgunov, an acquaintance of S. Dmitriyev, stated that he approached S. Dmitriyev as a result of he wished to learn the way he might purchase a parking area close to the home. The person remembered that he had come to the workplace in Vilnius due to this query. V. Blizgunov claimed that he understood that S. Dmitriyev’s workplace was within the premises belonging to his spouse’s establishment.
“There was an workplace, I used to be there. The room the place N. Dmitrijeva had her enterprise. (…) N. Dmitrieva’s establishment associated to accounting,” stated the witness.
One other witness, Vitalijs Sediuk, who launched himself as S. Dmitrijev’s good friend, stated that he additionally visited S. Dmitrijev’s workplace. He claimed to have seen the politician’s spouse there as properly.
“I used to be at Sergej’s workplace on Skroblų avenue,” stated V. Sediukas.
The witness claimed to have realized from the media that regulation enforcement had began an investigation in opposition to S. Dmitriyev. V. Sediukas didn’t disguise that since he discovered about this, he began speaking with S. Dmitrijev extra typically, and he additionally talked to him in regards to the investigation launched by the regulation enforcement.
“It grew to become extra frequent (communication with S. Dmitriyev – ELTA). I requested what occurred, who and the way,” stated the witness and confirmed that he additionally spoke with S. Dmitrijev in regards to the case.
Olga Statkevich-Popadko, the previous assistant of S. Dmitriyev within the Seimas, additionally testified in court docket on Tuesday. She stated that she visited S. Dmitrijev in his workplace on Skroblų avenue. She claimed that she helped the politician so as to assist remedy the issues confronted by aged Vilnius residents.
“N. Dmitrijeva labored there,” recalled O. Statkevich-Popadko.
The witness stated that she additionally realized from the media in regards to the investigation launched by the regulation enforcement in opposition to S. Dmitriyev. O. Statkevich-Popadko stated she known as S. Dmitrijev to ask in regards to the investigation.
Prosecutor Jūratė Karčinskienė checked whether or not the witness contacted S. Dmitrijev or whether or not the politician known as the girl. Then the witness talked about that S. Dmitriev himself might have known as her.
J. Karčinskienė, for her half, replied that the regulation enforcement had obliged the witness to not talk with S. Dmitrijev.
On the subsequent court docket session, which will likely be held on July 1, it’s deliberate to proceed the questioning of witnesses.
The investigation was carried out by STT
A pre-trial investigation on the Particular Investigation Service (STT) was began final yr relating to the doable misuse of the Vilnius Metropolis Council member S. Dmitrijev, utilizing the funds allotted to pay bills associated to his actions as a council member.
In keeping with the investigation, S. Dmitrijev, as a member of the council at the moment, had the correct to obtain a cost to pay the bills of renting workplace premises on Skroblų avenue. In keeping with regulation enforcement, within the years 2019-2023, S. Dmitrijev had concluded a probably fictitious lease settlement for non-residential premises for workplace lease with a personal firm managed by his partner, during which allegedly unfaithful information was recorded. It’s believed that S. Dmitrijevs knew prematurely that he wouldn’t really perform the actions of a council member within the rented premises.
In keeping with regulation enforcement information, S. Dmitrijevas paid the administration of the Vilnius metropolis municipality month-to-month in 2019 so as to acquire monetary advantages. September – 2023 in April through the interval submitted, as suspected, cast monetary paperwork ready by his partner. On this manner, the latter, probably abusing his workplace, precipitated vital non-pecuniary harm to the Vilnius Metropolis Municipality and fraudulently obtained greater than 9 thousand. euros.
“The information collected through the investigation enable us to moderately consider that S. Dmitriyev’s spouse included some falsified monetary paperwork within the accounting of the corporate she manages. The content material of enterprise transactions recorded within the monetary paperwork doesn’t correspond to the truth as a result of non-provided rental companies of the premises registered in them, subsequently it’s not doable to partially decide the quantity of the corporate’s actions, its property, liabilities for 2019. August – 2020 the months of Could”, the prosecutor’s workplace stated.
S. Dmitrijevas partially admits the guilt and returned over 7 thousand to the municipality. euros, which he might have obtained by fraud.
S. Dmitriev, who’s now 64 years previous, was beforehand elected a member of the Seimas twice – in 2000-2004 and 2012-2106.
He was one of many founders of the “Lithuanian Russian Union” group and was its chairman. At present, S. Dmitrijev stated that he’s registered with the Employment Service.
2024-06-19 02:22:49