Defining Online Relationships: A deep Dive into the XFN 1.1 Profile
Table of Contents
A standardized system for defining relationships online, known as the XFN 1.1 profile, offers a nuanced approach to categorizing connections in the digital age. Originally described in relation to HTML4 Meta data profiles and the ‘rel’ attribute, XFN provides a vocabulary for accurately portraying the nature of relationships, moving beyond the limitations of basic social networking features.
Understanding the Core Concepts
At its heart, XFN 1.1 is about adding meaning to links.The “rel” attribute in HTML, traditionally used to define the relationship between a current document and a linked document, is expanded upon with a set of specific values. These values,according to the profile,can be used in any combination – unless specifically noted – and are intended to be legally compliant.
The profile categorizes relationships into several key areas: friendship, physical, professional, geographical, family, romantic, and identity. Within each category, a range of specific descriptors allows for granular definition.
The friendship category offers options like “contact,” “acquaintance,” and “friend,” acknowledging varying degrees of closeness. A “contact” signifies someone you know how to reach, frequently enough reciprocated, while an “acquaintance” represents a more casual connection – perhaps someone with whom you’ve exchanged brief greetings. A “friend,” naturally, denotes a closer, more established bond.
The physical category is straightforward, with “met” indicating a real-world encounter.This relationship is described as symmetric, meaning if person A has met person B, person B has also met person A.
Professional connections are delineated with terms like “co-worker” and “colleague.” A “co-worker” shares a workplace, while a “colleague” operates within the same field. Both are typically symmetric and frequently enough transitive – meaning if A is a colleague of B, and B is a colleague of C, A is highly likely a colleague of C.
Location, Lineage, and Love: Defining Context
The geographical category introduces “co-resident” – sharing a street address – and “neighbor,” indicating proximity. Both are symmetric and, in the case of “co-resident,” transitive.
The complexities of family are addressed with “child,” “parent,” “sibling,” “spouse,” and “kin.” Notably, “child” and “parent” are inverse relationships. “Spouse” denotes a marital bond, while “kin” encompasses broader familial ties.
The romantic category offers descriptors like “muse,” “crush,” “date,” and “sweetheart,” each representing a different level of romantic involvement. These relationships are often symmetric, but not transitive.
the identity category includes “me,” a link to oneself at a different URL. This is described as exclusive of all other XFN values and requires symmetry.
The Enduring Relevance of XFN
While the social media landscape has evolved dramatically as the inception of XFN 1.1, the underlying principles remain relevant. The need to accurately and meaningfully represent relationships online persists,and the XFN profile provides a foundational framework for doing so. As digital interactions become increasingly complex, standardized systems like XFN offer a valuable tool for navigating the nuances of connection in the 21st century.
