Your Standing Desk Might Actually Be as Bad as Sitting All Day : ScienceAlert

by time news usa

New Research Questions⁣ Benefits ‌of ⁤Standing in the Fight ⁣Against⁤ Sedentary Lifestyles

In recent years, ⁣standing has been touted⁣ as a remedy to ⁣a sedentary lifestyle, especially for desk ​workers who spend ​long hours seated at their screens. However, ‍a new study conducted by ⁤researchers in Australia and the⁣ Netherlands suggests‌ that standing for prolonged periods⁢ may not​ be significantly‌ better than sitting and‌ could pose its own life-threatening risks.

The study analyzed data over nearly seven years from 83,013 adults, collected as part of the UK Biobank. Researchers tracked physical activity, sleep, and sedentary⁣ time using wrist-worn devices. The amount of⁣ time individuals spent standing‍ and sitting was correlated with incidents of⁣ cardiovascular diseases, ⁤including coronary heart disease,‍ heart‍ failure, and ‌ stroke, as well ​as circulatory diseases like low blood pressure upon standing, varicose veins,‌ chronic venous insufficiency,⁣ and venous‍ ulcers.

The results indicated ⁣no significant association between the time ​spent standing and the risk of cardiovascular diseases. This suggests that standing desks and‌ similar work arrangements might not be sufficient to mitigate ⁤the health risks associated with prolonged⁣ sitting.

Matthew ‍Ahmadi, ⁢a population health scientist‌ at the University of Sydney, ⁢notes ⁤that previous studies supporting the benefits of ⁣standing often relied on ‘soft endpoints’ such ​as improved blood ⁤pressure or insulin sensitivity. In contrast,⁢ this research focused on ‘hard clinical endpoints’—hospitalizations or deaths related to cardiovascular diseases—showing that long ‍periods of standing versus sitting did not significantly impact cardiovascular ‍outcomes.

“More time⁢ spent sitting didn’t necessarily lower​ a person’s risk of cardiovascular disease, nor ⁣did it increase‍ the risk,” ⁤Ahmadi explains. “It was a null finding. However, it⁣ did increase their⁣ risk ‌of circulatory ⁤diseases.”

The study found that standing for more than two hours a day raised the risk of circulatory diseases by 11 percent for ⁣each additional half hour. Conversely, sitting for more than 10 hours daily increased circulatory disease ⁤risk by 26 percent‌ for every extra ​hour spent seated.

This data suggests⁢ that a lack of movement—whether sitting⁣ or standing—could contribute to the risk of orthostatic circulatory diseases.

While ‍the sample size of this study⁢ is ⁣notable, it is essential to recognize that, being observational, it cannot ‌definitively⁤ prove causation between⁣ time spent standing ⁣or sitting‌ and‍ disease incidence. Nonetheless, it reinforces the growing body of research​ underlining the importance of regular⁣ physical movement.

Ahmadi emphasizes that standing alone should not be viewed as a panacea for the ailments associated ⁤with sedentary lifestyles. “Standing needs to be mixed ⁤in with other‌ forms of activity that gets ⁤the body moving,”‌ he ⁣asserts.

He adds, “We’re not seeing the risk of orthostatic diseases‍ when‌ someone is ‌walking around. ‍The risk ‍appears ‌mainly when one⁤ remains⁢ stationary while⁤ standing, leading to blood pooling in the⁣ lower extremities.”

This research has ⁢been published in the International Journal of Epidemiology.

Interview between Time.news Editor and⁤ Matthew Ahmadi

Time.news ⁢Editor: Welcome, Matthew Ahmadi! Thank you for joining us today. Your recent research has stirred quite a conversation around the benefits ⁢of ‍standing in ​combating sedentary‍ lifestyles. Can ⁤you​ summarize the‍ key findings of your study for our audience?

Matthew Ahmadi: ⁤ Absolutely! Our study,⁢ which analyzed ​data from​ over 83,000 adults‌ over nearly seven years, ‍found that​ prolonged standing⁤ may not be significantly better than ⁢sitting when it comes ⁣to health outcomes, ⁤particularly cardiovascular diseases. Despite the ‌popular belief that standing more can counteract the ‍hazards of‍ sedentary behavior, our⁣ findings suggest‌ this might not be ⁢the case.

Time.news Editor: That’s fascinating. Standing desks⁤ have gained immense popularity as a remedy for those spending‌ long‍ hours sitting. What implications⁤ does your study have for ⁤those who have adopted these standing ⁢workspaces?

Matthew‌ Ahmadi: The implications are quite significant. While standing desks might give⁢ the impression ⁤of ⁣a healthier lifestyle, our research suggests they are not a panacea. Just‍ switching from sitting to ​standing isn’t enough⁤ to mitigate ‍the risks of​ cardiovascular diseases. It ​indicates that we need to⁤ think more holistically about our physical activity and overall lifestyle, rather than focusing solely on the proportions of time spent sitting or standing.

Time.news Editor: That’s an important perspective. You mentioned in your study that ⁣previous research often relied on “soft endpoints.” Can you explain that distinction and why it matters?

Matthew Ahmadi: Sure! “Soft endpoints” refer to‌ measures like ⁣improved blood pressure or insulin sensitivity, which are⁤ important but not directly related to severe health outcomes. In contrast, we focused on “hard ‌clinical endpoints,” such⁢ as hospitalizations and mortality related to cardiovascular diseases.‌ By‌ examining​ these, we aimed to⁤ deliver more concrete evidence regarding health risks associated⁤ with different postures and⁤ activities, ‌which‍ ultimately provides clearer⁢ guidance for long-term health strategies.

Time.news Editor: It sounds like your research challenges some long-held ⁣beliefs about standing as a solution to sedentary behavior. Based‌ on your findings, what ‌do you recommend instead for improving health⁤ in today’s workspace environment?

Matthew Ahmadi: My recommendation would be to incorporate‌ a variety​ of movements throughout the day. Instead ‌of just standing more, aim⁣ for short⁣ walks, ‌stretching exercises, or even standing up every half ⁣hour to move a bit. It’s about increasing overall ⁢physical activity and reducing prolonged periods of both sitting and standing still. Incorporating movement into our daily routines can ‍better support cardiovascular health and ⁤overall well-being.

Time.news ⁤Editor: Great ​advice! Lastly, given the attention on wellness in ​workspaces today, how do you see the future of workplace design ​evolving in light‌ of your research?

Matthew Ahmadi: I think we will see a shift toward more dynamic and flexible workspaces that⁤ encourage movement.‍ Companies may begin to invest in designs that facilitate natural movement, ⁢like walking meetings, shared ⁣spaces​ that‌ require physical navigation, or even standing meetings, but crucially, they ⁢will need to focus on creating an ⁤environment that supports extensive physical​ activity throughout the day. Employee well-being should ⁢be at the forefront of these ‌designs, optimizing not just for performance but for holistic health.

Time.news Editor: ⁢ Thank you, Matthew. Your insights are invaluable, and it’s clear that there is much more to consider than just sitting or standing. We appreciate you taking⁣ the time ⁢to share your findings with us!

Matthew Ahmadi: Thank you for having me! It’s been ⁤a ⁤pleasure, and⁣ I hope our conversation encourages a more nuanced dialogue around health ⁢and​ workplace design.

You may also like

Leave a Comment