The Second District Court in Criminal Matters in Mexico City left a notification at Door 3 of the Senate of the Republic to the senator, Miguel Ángel Yunes Márquezfor an amparo that was filed by orders of December 5 and 10.
“Based on article 27, section I, subsection c) of the amparo Law, this notice is left, posted on the door of the home, at twelve hours and fifty minutes, on December 12, two thousand twenty-four, “by virtue of not having found anyone with whom to understand the notification procedure,” the document states.
In the “NOTICE”, the judicial authority asks Yunes Márquez to “personally go to the premises of the Second district Court in Criminal Matters in Mexico City”, the above “in order to notify him of the 5 and December 10, two thousand twenty-four.”
It must be remembered that in the session on December 5, the PAN senator, Miguel Ángel yunes Márquez, threatened the PAN senator, Mario Vázquez, to “break his mother” for accusing him of “giving himself” to Morena, for which He was criminally denounced by the PAN senator.
LDAV
Related
what are the implications of the amparo process for public officials in Mexico?
Interview on Legal Procedures and Political Implications in Mexico
Time.news Editor: Thank you for joining us today to discuss the recent developments surrounding Senator Miguel Ángel Yunes Márquez and the notification from the Second District court in Criminal Matters in Mexico City. Can you start by summarizing what occurred in this case?
Expert: Certainly. On December 12, 2024, the Second District Court in Criminal Matters in Mexico City posted a notification at the Senate to inform Senator Yunes Márquez about an amparo he filed related to certain legal actions from December 5 and 10, 2024. The court had to leave the notice at the Senate because they were unable to reach him directly. This situation underscores the complexities of legal notifications in political contexts.
Time.news Editor: In the context of mexican law, what does the amparo process involve and why is it significant in this instance?
Expert: The amparo is a constitutional remedy in Mexico that allows individuals to seek protection from legislative actions or judicial decisions that they believe violate their rights. In this case, the meaning stems from the political tension surrounding Yunes Márquez, particularly his aggressive response to accusations from fellow PAN senator Mario Vázquez. Such legal protections play a crucial role in maintaining a balance between government powers and individual rights, especially amid political disputes.
Time.news Editor: The notification indicated a personal requirement for Yunes Márquez to appear at court. How essential is this step in the amparo process, and what could happen if he does not comply?
Expert: It’s vital for Yunes Márquez to personally attend the court as instructed. Non-compliance could lead to contempt of court proceedings or further legal complications. It indicates the seriousness of the situation and reiterates the accountability of public officials to legal processes. In the realm of political implications,ignoring the court’s directive could escalate tensions within the PAN party and provoke public scrutiny.
Time.news Editor: This incident follows a heated session on December 5, where Yunes Márquez allegedly threatened Vázquez. How do such incidents impact public perception of lawmakers in Mexico?
Expert: Incidents like this severely affect public trust in lawmakers and the political system. When senators resort to personal threats over political disagreements, it not only undermines their professional integrity but also contributes to a toxic political climate.This can further alienate voters and exacerbate political polarization, eroding the public’s confidence in their elected representatives.
time.news Editor: What practical advice woudl you give to politicians or public figures facing legal challenges, particularly in light of this situation?
Expert: First and foremost, it’s crucial to adhere strictly to legal procedures and take notifications seriously.Engaging with the legal system transparently can enhance credibility with constituents. Politicians should also prioritize clear communication and conflict resolution strategies to avoid escalation of tensions within their political party. Additionally, seeking legal counsel to navigate the complexities of the law is always a wise approach.
Time.news Editor: Thank you for your insights. This situation highlights the intersection of law and politics in Mexico,emphasizing the need for accountability and professionalism among public officials.
Expert: Thank you for having me. It’s significant for both the public and officials to understand these dynamics, as they substantially impact the political landscape in Mexico.