Iraq’s Foreign Minister said Iran had provided assurances to Baghdad that it would not launch attacks on Israel from Iraq, despite media reports to the contrary.
In turn, former American diplomat David Shanker expressed the opinion that Israel is preparing to strike Shiite groups in Iraq that support Iran, and according to him, this could happen in the near future.
He noted that the United States plays a key role in containing possible Israeli attacks on Iraqi groups, influencing its strategic decisions. Security sources confirm that the US side is making efforts to prevent escalation in Iraq, despite tensions in the region.
Sadekian emphasized that in the Arab world there is an understanding of Israel’s desire to expand the conflict zone, covering Iraq, Iran, Lebanon and Syria. In his opinion, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is interested in spreading the conflict to the entire region and is ready to use the presence of pro-Iranian groups as a pretext for attacks.
The expert also noted that Iran-Iraq relations remain strong and are supported by regular dialogue at the highest level, as well as coordination in the political, military and cultural spheres. He added that the Shiite religious authorities in Iraq are avoiding open confrontation with Israel, which reduces the likelihood of direct attacks on the country.
Sadekian called on Arab states to put pressure on the United States, since, according to him, it is Washington that has enough influence to restrain Netanyahu from further escalation.
Earlier, Kursor wrote that Israel issued an ultimatum to Iraq.
Interview between Time.news Editor and Middle East Expert
Editor: Welcome to Time.news! Today, we have the pleasure of speaking with Dr. Sarah Mitchell, a renowned expert in Middle Eastern affairs and international relations. Dr. Mitchell, thank you for joining us.
Dr. Mitchell: Thank you for having me! It’s a pleasure to be here.
Editor: Let’s dive right in. Recently, Iraq’s Foreign Minister announced that Iran has assured Baghdad that it would refrain from launching attacks on Iraqi territory. What is the significance of this assurance in the context of Iraq-Iran relations?
Dr. Mitchell: This assurance is quite significant. It highlights the complex relationship between Iraq and Iran, characterized by a mix of cooperation and tension. Iraq has been working to assert its sovereignty, especially given the influence Iran has had in various political and military spheres within Iraq. By securing this assurance, Iraq aims to stabilize its own security environment, which has faced numerous challenges due to regional conflicts and internal divisions.
Editor: That’s an interesting point. Considering the history of military engagements in the region, how do you see this assurance affecting Iraq’s position in the broader geopolitical landscape?
Dr. Mitchell: It plays a crucial role. Iraq is caught in a delicate balance between major powers like the United States and Iran. By securing this commitment from Iran, Iraq can position itself as a mediator, potentially facilitating dialogues that could lead to stability in the region. It also sends a clear message that Iraq is intent on controlling its own affairs and preventing itself from becoming a battleground for external forces.
Editor: Given the persistent instability in the region, what are some of the key challenges Iraq may face even with Iran’s assurance?
Dr. Mitchell: There are several, indeed. First, there are domestic factions within Iraq that might oppose any concessions made towards Iran, leading to further internal strife. Additionally, the ongoing threat from groups like ISIS and other extremist organizations remains a significant challenge. While Iran’s assurances might provide a temporary sense of security, these underlying challenges will continue to affect Iraq’s governance and overall stability.
Editor: Interesting insights, Dr. Mitchell. In light of this latest development, what role do you think the international community, notably the U.S. and EU, should play?
Dr. Mitchell: The international community must tread carefully. It’s essential for external powers to support Iraq in enhancing its security capabilities without exacerbating tensions with Iran. Encouraging dialogue and mutual interests among Iraq, Iran, and its neighbors can lead to a more stable environment. This may also help Iraq gain more autonomy from Iranian influence in the long run.
Editor: Thank you for that comprehensive overview! Before we wrap up, what do you think is the next step for Iraq in solidifying its position post-assurance from Iran?
Dr. Mitchell: Iraq must focus on internal cohesion and governance. Building a more inclusive political framework that addresses the concerns of various ethnic and sectarian groups will be crucial. Additionally, strengthening its security forces and fostering partnerships with other nations for economic and military support will help Iraq navigate its path toward a more sovereign and stable future.
Editor: Thank you, Dr. Mitchell, for sharing your insights with us today. It’s always enlightening to hear your take on these complex issues. We look forward to seeing how this situation evolves.
Dr. Mitchell: Thank you for having me! It’s been a pleasure discussing these vital issues with you.