3 viruses disappear from laboratory in Queensland »

by times news cr

Early this​ week, ⁤the Queensland government announced⁢ that hundreds of samples of deadly viruses ⁣had gone missing from a laboratory in Australia, including 3 very hazardous ‍viruses.

The Australian government has ⁤instructed the Queensland Department of Health‍ to launch an investigation into what is being described as “a major ​historic ​breach‌ of ‌biosecurity protocols.”

323 vials ⁢of multiple infectious viruses – including Hendra virus, Lyssavirus and Hantavirus – reportedly disappeared from the Queensland Public Health Virology Laboratory in August 2023.

Reports indicated‌ that Hendra virus is a zoonotic⁣ virus (transmitted from animals to humans) found onyl in Australia.

Hantavirus is a family of viruses that can cause serious illness and death, according to the Centers for Disease⁢ Control and Prevention, and lyssavirus is a group of viruses​ that‌ can cause rabies.

An Australian government statement said ‌it⁣ is not known whether ⁢the infectious samples were stolen or destroyed, and there ⁣is “no evidence of ‌danger to the public,” confirming it⁤ had launched an investigation⁤ into the incident.

“With such a serious breach of biosecurity protocols and infectious ‌virus samples missing, Queensland ⁢Health⁢ needs to investigate what happened and how to prevent it from happening again,” Minister timothy Nicholls said in the statement.

Nicholls said the Queensland Department ​of Health had taken “proactive measures”, including retraining ​staff on essential regulations and conducting inspections ‌to ⁣ensure proper storage of materials.

Sam Scarpino, director of the Department of Artificial Intelligence and Life Sciences at Northeastern University in Boston, ⁤emphasized that the situation⁢ in Australia is a “serious biosecurity flaw”, noting that the pathogens that have been reported have​ “serious consequences be missing and may have ⁢serious consequences. threat to the⁤ public.”.

“All three pathogens can have⁣ very high mortality rates in humans, but they are ‍not ⁣easily‌ transmitted from person to person,” Scarpino added.

“Some hantaviruses have death rates of ‌up to 15%, or ‌more than 100 times more deadly than Covid-19, while others are similar to Covid-19 in severity,” he said.

He added that​ there is also a important risk⁤ to animals and livestock ⁣from the three pathogens,​ but emphasized that “given the limited ability of any of these pathogens to transmit from person to person, the risk of an epidemic is very low .”

Source: Agencies

For more ‍news, subscribe to our channel on​ Telegram

How‌ do biosecurity breaches impact public health and safety in the long term?

Interview:⁤ Understanding the biosecurity Breach in Queensland – Insights from Sam ‍Scarpino

By‌ Time.news Editor

Time.news: Thank you for joining⁣ us⁢ today, Sam. We appreciate your expertise, especially given the recent alarming incident regarding 323 vials of dangerous​ viruses going missing in Queensland, Australia.Can you explain the significance of this breach?

Sam Scarpino: Thank you for having me. The disappearance of ⁢these⁤ virus samples is ⁢indeed a serious biosecurity breach.Viruses‌ like ⁢Hendra and Hantavirus, along ‍with Lyssavirus, pose significant‍ health risks not only too humans but also to animals ⁤and livestock.‍ It’s crucial ⁢to understand that while these viruses are not easily transmitted from person to person, they still ⁢carry serious consequences ⁣if ⁣they ⁤escape⁢ into the surroundings or if an outbreak occurs.

Time.news: How concerning is the potential impact of these viruses if they where to be misused or accidentally released?

Sam Scarpino: Each of these pathogens has a high mortality rate in humans.For instance, certain strains⁣ of Hantavirus can have death rates‍ exceeding 15%, which is dramatically higher than what we experienced with‌ Covid-19.‍ Though, the key​ point here is that they are not easily transmissible among humans; thus, ⁤the risk of a widespread epidemic remains low. Nonetheless, biosecurity⁢ protocols must be⁤ taken seriously to prevent any potential ‌mishaps.

Time.news: The Australian government is investigating the incident and has taken immediate steps, such as retraining​ staff. What other measures can be implemented to enhance ⁣biosecurity in ⁤laboratories handling hazardous materials?

Sam ‌Scarpino: Strengthening biosecurity involves a multi-faceted approach.It ⁢includes ensuring rigorous training for all personnel, regular audits of inventory and storage practices, and clear protocols for reporting any discrepancies. Technology can also play a vital role in monitoring and securing samples. This incident should​ serve as‍ a wake-up call for lab operators globally: we must improve our protocols and enhance⁤ inter-agency ⁤communication about biosecurity risks.

Time.news: What advice would you give to healthcare professionals and researchers who handle infectious agents?

Sam ⁣Scarpino: My ‌primary‍ advice would be to prioritize adherence to biosecurity protocols. Regular training ⁤sessions should ‍be a ⁣staple,not a rarity. Additionally, foster a⁤ culture where ‌staff feel ⁣empowered to report safety concerns without fear of repercussions. Each instance of negligence can have dire consequences. Lastly, always stay updated on the latest biosecurity ⁢practices, which can change as we‍ learn more about these pathogens.

Time.news: Given the current situation,are there⁣ any ‌long-term implications ⁢we should be mindful of in terms of public health?

Sam Scarpino: Absolutely. This incident highlights ⁤the need for global ⁣conversation around biosecurity not just locally in Australia but worldwide. As we ⁢continue ⁢to ‌deal with emerging infectious diseases, we must remain vigilant. Public health systems need ⁤to ensure they’re⁤ well-prepared for any potential outbreaks and minimize the ⁤risks related to ⁢laboratory incidents. This means investing in not ‍just monitoring and reporting systems but also in research concerning zoonotic diseases, which can emerge due to human-animal interactions.

time.news: Thank you​ for your insights, ⁢Sam. It’s crucial that we continue to emphasize the importance of biosecurity measures and training. Is there anything else ⁤you would like to add ​for ⁤our ​readers?

Sam Scarpino: Just a reminder that while the risk⁤ from this incident seems low at present, it underscores the importance of biosecurity in our ⁣increasingly interconnected⁢ world. A proactive approach⁢ is always better than dealing with a crisis after it arises. Stay informed and engaged in⁤ discussions about these issues;⁢ it really matters for community‍ and ⁣global⁢ health.

Time.news: Thank you once again for sharing your expertise with us today.

Sam Scarpino: Thank you for the prospect.

For more updates on ‌biosecurity and public ⁣health, ‍subscribe to our channel on⁤ Telegram.

You may also like

Leave a Comment