The source confirmed that our country is negotiating indirectly with the Syrian rebels, using intermediaries from the Druze community, which is present in both Israel and Syria, and also through the Kurds, foreign intelligence services and the united States.
According to him, on the othre side there are parties ready for dialogue, and that certain messages have already been conveyed. He also added that Israel intends to continue air strikes to destroy weapons associated with the Assad regime. The source also said that the United States was aware of what was happening and fully supports Israel’s actions in Syria.
As previously reported,Israel issued a strong warning to Syrian rebels with ties to Turkish proxies,including Hayat Tahrir al-Sham (HTS).
Earlier, Kursor wrote that Syrian rebels from the HTS group sent a warning to Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan, declaring their intentions to overthrow the regime of Bashar al-Assad. They called on Turkey not to interfere in their actions, Reuters reports, citing its sources.
At the beginning of the year, the rebels began to feel that Ankara was strengthening its position vis-à-vis Assad, which gave them confidence in their actions.
In addition, Cursor has already reported that the Syrian “salvation government” presented the key points of its program aimed at creating a new, free and fair Syria. The Ministry of Political Affairs said in a statement that the country’s liberation is considered a victory for the entire people.
What are the main challenges faced by intermediaries in the Syrian negotiations?
Interview: Navigating the Complex Landscape of Syrian Negotiations and Israeli Air Strikes
Time.news Editor: Thank you for joining us today to discuss the ongoing negotiations in Syria and Israel’s military strategies. Could you start by outlining the recent developments in this region?
Expert in Middle Eastern Affairs: Absolutely. We’re currently witnessing a complex scenario where Israel is engaging in indirect negotiations with Syrian rebels. These talks are facilitated through intermediaries from the druze community, and also Kurdish representatives and foreign intelligence services, which include the United States. This demonstrates Israel’s strategic approach to maintaining its interests while navigating the intricate political landscape of Syria.
Time.news Editor: It sounds like there are several parties involved in these negotiations. What is the significance of these intermediaries, especially the Druze and the Kurds?
Expert: The Druze community has a unique position in the region, with ties to both Israel and syria. This makes them valuable intermediaries who can communicate effectively between different factions. The Kurds, conversely, have been influential players in the Syrian conflict.Their involvement underscores the complexities of the negotiations; thay have their own ambitions and interests that can influence the outcomes.
Time.news Editor: Interestingly, it has been reported that Israel intends to continue its airstrikes against Assad’s regime. What are the implications of this strategy?
Expert: israel’s airstrikes aim to prevent Syria from accumulating weapons that could pose a threat. This strategy is supported by the United States, indicating a shared interest in diminishing Assad’s capacity to act aggressively in the region. By continuing these operations, Israel sends a strong message to both the Assad regime and the Syrian rebels: that they will not tolerate changes that threaten their security.
Time.news Editor: there seems to be a division within the Syrian rebels as well, particularly with groups like Hayat Tahrir al-Sham (HTS) warning Turkey. What does this indicate about the shifting dynamics among rebel factions?
Expert: The tensions between HTS and Turkey reflect a broader struggle for power and influence in the region. HTS is trying to assert its autonomy while warning turkey against interference. This move suggests that the rebels, feeling emboldened by changing dynamics, might be more willing to challenge external influences, including Ankara’s support for certain factions. This could lead to an increased commitment to their cause but also risks further fragmentation within the rebel groups.
Time.news Editor: You mentioned the Syrian “salvation government” affecting the narrative. Can you elaborate on their proposed reforms and what it means for Syria’s future?
Expert: The Syrian “salvation government” is positioning itself as the legitimate authority by outlining a vision for a new, free, and fair Syria. Their proposals aim to unite various factions and emphasize liberation—as a shared victory—intending to shift public perception and gain more support. If successful, they could reshape the political landscape in Syria, possibly leading to a more inclusive government.
Time.news Editor: For our readers, what practical advice would you offer them to better understand these unfolding events and their implications?
Expert: I would advise readers to stay informed through credible news sources and keep an eye on the evolving relationships between local factions and international players like the US and Turkey. Understanding these dynamics is crucial, as shifts can happen rapidly. Engaging with expert analyses can also provide deeper insights into how these geopolitical tensions could affect the broader region and international relations.
Time.news Editor: Thank you for your valuable insights and analysis. It’s clear that the situation in Syria remains complex and continues to evolve, impacting various players both locally and internationally. We appreciate your time today.
Expert: Thank you for having me. It’s essential to keep discussing these issues as they develop, and I look forward to sharing more insights in the future.