Baghdad – IA – Nassar Al-Hajj
Parliamentarians, political and authorized specialists criticized a transfer within the US Congress in opposition to the Iraqi judiciary, contemplating it blatant interference that requires a diplomatic and authorized response. Whereas they renewed their help for the judiciary identified for its integrity, independence and impartiality, they thought-about the place expressed by Consultant Mike Waltz a flagrant violation of worldwide legislation.
The Presidency of Parliament condemns the accusations
Performing Speaker of the Home of Representatives, Mohsen Al-Mandalawi, condemned these accusations.
A press release issued by the media workplace of the Speaker of the Home of Representatives on behalf of Al-Mandlawi, which was acquired by the (INA), said that “what was reported by American media shops concerning the offensive statements of Republican Congressman (Mike Waltz) in opposition to the Chief Justice of the Supreme Judicial Council, Faeq Zidane, is a blatant interference in Iraqi inner affairs, and a harmful precedent added to the document of actions of the Biden authorities, which publicly supported probably the most heinous mass bloodbath dedicated by the Zionist gangs in opposition to the folks of Gaza, and immediately threatens to undermine the sovereignty of states and their symbols with no authorized justification that enables it to take action.”
Al-Mandalawi referred to as on “the Ministry of International Affairs to maneuver by way of its diplomatic means and ship a direct message that Iraq, with all its authorities, rejects such interventions and offensive statements issued by a member of the US Congress,” stressing that “Iraq is a sovereign nation, and its relations with all nations are constructed on the idea of mutual respect.”
He careworn that “the invoice that’s to be submitted to Congress by the Republican consultant, if permitted, will represent a harmful turning level that may have an effect on, in a technique or one other, the character of bilateral relations between the 2 nations.”
Al-Mandalawi affirmed “the Home of Representatives’ full help for the pinnacle of the judiciary, and its absolute rejection of any abuse of his authority and all authorities,” stressing “the Presidency of the Home of Representatives’ keenness to observe up on such statements and abuses and take all the pieces essential to reject them.”
The International Ministry condemns
The Iraqi Ministry of International Affairs condemned the place of Consultant Mike Waltz.
The ministry stated in a press release – acquired by the (INA): that it “adopted the statements and instructions of US Congressman Mike Waltz in direction of the Chairman of the Supreme Judicial Council, Decide Faiq Zaidan.”
The Ministry affirmed its full rejection of what was talked about in these statements as a violation of the individual of the Chairman of the Judicial Council, Decide Faiq Zaidan, and the essential rights of the Iraqi state, by which the judiciary represents the first guarantor of rights and freedoms.
The ministry thought-about these statements as blatant interference in Iraq’s inner affairs, and careworn that “making an attempt to affect the judiciary is an assault on a very powerful elements of the state entity, which is answerable for reaching justice, equality and stability within the nation.”
The Ministry of International Affairs expressed its rejection of makes an attempt to contain Congress in such points, as they represent interference within the sovereignty of nations and their judicial techniques.
Refusal to tamper with the Iraqi judiciary and nationwide figures
In flip, Member of Parliament Adel Al-Rikabi confirmed to the (INA), that “the place of Republican Consultant within the US Congress Mike Waltz concerning the Iraqi judiciary may be very unusual,” noting that “Iraq is a sovereign nation and won’t enable anybody to intervene in its affairs, and this matter is categorically rejected by the folks and the Home of Representatives.”
He added, “Iraq is the one which decides its coverage and manages its affairs in line with its nationwide pursuits, and nobody, no matter his place, whether or not American or from one other nation, has the best to find out which Iraqi is loyal to Iraq or not,” indicating, “Iraqis know what’s within the curiosity of their nation and who leads their constitutional authorities, and this blatant interference can’t be accepted, and the federal government and the Home of Representatives should have a place; as a result of this motion will be prolonged to nationwide figures and authorities that signify the sovereignty of the state.”
In flip, a member of the Home of Representatives, Consultant Hussein Arab, informed the (INA): “We reject any try and undermine the Iraqi judiciary with all its personalities, from the pinnacle of the Supreme Judiciary to all members of the Iraqi establishment, as it’s the impenetrable fortress of the rule of legislation that nobody can dare, and Al-Faisal and the arbiter in All disputed instances, if they’re a federal supreme court docket or have an effect on a better judiciary, are represented by its president.
He added, “These calls are an try and undermine the Iraqi judiciary, and Iraq is a sovereign state, and the Home of Representatives can’t settle for that anybody hurt the Iraqi judiciary, as it’s the true help for all simply causes that we are able to depend on by way of them.”
The judiciary is a basic pillar of the rule of legislation.
For his half, Chairman of the Parliamentary Finance Committee, Consultant Atwan Al-Atwani, condemned makes an attempt to insult the Iraqi judiciary.
Al-Atwani stated in a press release acquired by the (INA): “We condemn and denounce the phrases of the American Republican Consultant, Mike Waltz, concerning the President of the Supreme Judicial Council, Decide Dr. Faeq Zidane, and we affirm our absolute rejection of any overseas interference that impacts the sovereignty of Iraq and the independence of its establishments.”
He continued, “The Supreme Judicial Council and its President, Decide Faeq Zidane, are a basic pillar for making certain the rule of legislation and the independence of the Iraqi judiciary. Due to this fact, we think about these reprehensible statements to be geared toward obstructing the constructing of a state of establishments, by which the rule of legislation is revered and democracy is consolidated.”
He identified that, “Whereas we name on the Iraqi authorities to take a transparent and agency place in direction of these statements, and to defend the independence of its judicial establishments, and to not have interaction or undergo the coverage of strain and sanctions, we warn that such statements have dire penalties for the way forward for US-Iraqi bilateral relations, because the Iraqi judiciary is a crimson line, and we won’t enable any assault on it or its symbols, foremost amongst them the courageous choose Faeq Zidane.”
Demanding the Iraqi International Ministry to take a place
In flip, the pinnacle of the parliamentary companies bloc, MP Aziz Sharif Al-Mayah, stated in a tweet – adopted by the (INA): “We reject a budget and irresponsible accusations and statements made by US Congressman Mike Waltz in opposition to the President of the Supreme Judicial Council, which we think about a part of the blatant interference in Iraq’s affairs and sovereignty.”
He added, “Whereas we affirm our help for the judiciary and its head, Faeq Zidane, we name on the Ministry of International Affairs to take a agency stance in direction of these irresponsible statements, along with a transparent and robust parliamentary stance in direction of these interventions and violations by a few of these affiliated with the Washington authority, which we think about a pure response and confusion in direction of the brave stance of the Iraqi judiciary, which contributed to the overthrow of a lot of corruption and terrorism mafias. We emphasize the integrity of the Iraqi judiciary, its professionalism and its nice position in supporting the democratic course of in Iraq regardless of all of the challenges and pressures it has been uncovered to all through the earlier years.”
In flip, MP Ahmed Salim Al-Kanani stated in a put up on the (X) web site – adopted by the (INA): “What the Republican consultant within the US Congress is looking for in opposition to the Chief Justice of the Supreme Judicial Council, Decide Faeq Zidane, is rejected and condemned and is an unacceptable act in line with customized and legislation,” indicating, “Being a member of the US Congress doesn’t give him the best to say that he has authority over the nations of the world and their establishments, and grants himself the best to assault this or that nation.”
He added, “I don’t consider that actions of this sort are impeccable except there are different motives behind them. Maybe Waltz did not know that the nations of the world don’t legislate their legal guidelines in Congress, and that nations, their establishments, and their sovereignty have immunity and safety permitted by the legal guidelines and resolutions of the United Nations.”
For her half, the pinnacle of the New Technology Parliamentary Bloc, MP Sarwa Abdel Wahed, confirmed that “insulting official establishments by exterior events, particularly the Supreme Judiciary, is unacceptable.”
Abdul Wahed stated in a tweet on the (X) platform – adopted by the (INA): “The Iraqi International Ministry is meant to answer the accusations made in official methods, and we should all help the Iraqi judiciary and maintain it away from regional and political conflicts.”
A flagrant violation of worldwide legislation
As well as, authorized professional Ali Al-Tamimi informed the (INA): “Iraq is an impartial, sovereign nation in accordance with the United Nations Constitution, Articles (1, 2, 3, and 4) and Article 18 of the United Nations Constitution of 1945, the place he careworn the independence and sovereignty of states and the inadmissibility of interference.” Within the affairs of states of any state in direction of different states.”
He continued, “These articles give nations independence and diplomatic immunity from any interference, however this interference by the US of America violates the United Nations Constitution and violates the articles that had been talked about. Additionally, there’s a bilateral settlement between Iraq and the US of America issued in 2008, which is known as the Strategic Settlement and is binding in its article. 27 The 2 events are required to help the opposite get together politically, economically, and socially, and due to this fact this intervention explicitly violates the settlement, and this settlement is deposited within the United Nations, and in accordance with Article 102 of the Constitution, violating it requires the United Nations to carry the US of America accountable for this flagrant violation of worldwide legislation and this settlement.”
He identified, “The Iraqi authorities can object to those interventions and the objection is thru the Iraqi consultant to the US of America. Iraq can submit a protest word to the Secretary-Common of the United Nations Secretariat. It may possibly additionally summon the American ambassador and submit a protest word, and that is out there to the Iraqi authorities.”