White House spokeswoman Karine Jean-Pierre said Iran should not respond to Israel‘s actions, but if it does, the United States will support Israel.
“Iran should not respond to Israeli retaliation. They should not… If they do, we will support Israel in its defense, but they should not,” Jean-Pierre said.
As previously reported, retired Major General Yossi Kuperwasser published an analytical article entitled “Iran Admits: There is No Military Way to Stop Israel,” in which he analyzes the consequences of the Israeli attack on Iran and its impact on the situation in the region.
The author emphasizes that the Israeli operation caused significant damage to Iranian air defense systems and missile production. This signals that Iran could face serious consequences if it attempts to develop nuclear weapons.
Earlier, Kursor wrote that there is growing concern in the world that after the destruction of the Iranian S-300 air defense systems as a result of an Israeli strike, Israel may begin to regularly attack targets in Iran, just as it does in Syria.
The fact that Iran decided to soften the impact of the Israeli attack indicates its fears of starting a larger war.
In addition, Kursor has already reported that Iran remains restrained in response to the recent Israeli airstrike, despite significant losses and damage caused to the country’s military infrastructure. Based on statements made by Leader Khamenei and President Pejhian, Iranian authorities are seeking to downplay the attack and its consequences by leaving the decision on possible retaliatory actions to the Supreme National Security Council.
Interview with Major General Yossi Kuperwasser: Understanding the Geopolitical Landscape of Iran and Israel
By Time.news Editor
Time.news: Thank you for joining us today, Major General Kuperwasser. Your recent article, “Iran Admits: There is No Military Way to Stop Israel,” brings to light pivotal insights regarding the ongoing tensions between Iran and Israel. Can you summarize the key points of your analysis regarding the Israeli airstrike on Iran?
Yossi Kuperwasser: Thank you for having me. My analysis highlights the severe impact of the Israeli operation on Iran’s military capabilities, particularly its air defense systems. The destruction of Iran’s S-300 systems has not only crippled their missile production capabilities but has also signaled to Iran that any further development of nuclear weapons could lead to even more significant consequences. This situation is crucial because it may redefine the military strategies employed by both nations.
Time.news: The situation appears precarious, with White House spokeswoman Karine Jean-Pierre stating the U.S. will support Israel if Iran responds militarily. What does this backing imply for the region’s stability?
Yossi Kuperwasser: The U.S. support for Israel is a longstanding policy, and this position reinforces Israel’s strategic posture. It sends a clear message to Iran that it should exercise restraint. However, does this deter Iran from retaliating? I believe it’s a delicate balance. Iran’s decision not to escalate further after the Israeli strikes indicates their fear of a larger conflict. This restraint becomes crucial in maintaining a fragile stability in the region.
Time.news: You mentioned that the Israeli airstrike indicates a potential shift in Israeli tactics. Can we expect Israel to conduct regular strikes in Iran, similar to their operations in Syria?
Yossi Kuperwasser: That is a likely scenario, especially given the strategic precedence set by the recent attack. The successful operation signals to Israel that it can disrupt Iranian military infrastructure without facing immediate retaliation, which may embolden them to engage in similar operations regularly. The implications of this are significant, potentially leading to a series of escalations that could draw in other regional players.
Time.news: Iranian officials, including Leader Khamenei and President Pejhian, are reported to be downplaying the attack’s impact. What can we interpret from this response?
Yossi Kuperwasser: Their muted response suggests that Iranian leadership is aware of the considerable damage inflicted and is strategizing carefully to avoid a larger confrontation. By leaving retaliatory decisions to the Supreme National Security Council, they are likely assessing the situation meticulously and weighing the risks of escalation against the need to preserve their national honor and military credibility.
Time.news: In light of these developments, what practical advice do you have for readers interested in understanding the evolving landscape of Middle Eastern geopolitics?
Yossi Kuperwasser: It’s essential for readers to comprehend that geopolitical dynamics in the Middle East are ever-evolving and often hinge on military capabilities and diplomatic relations. Staying informed about military advancements, international alliances, and policy changes is vital. For those involved in policy-making or academic discourse, fostering discussions on conflict de-escalation and peace-building measures will be crucial in navigating this complex landscape.
Time.news: Thank you, Major General Kuperwasser, for sharing your insights today. Your expertise provides clarity on a critical issue that impacts not only the region but also global stability.
Yossi Kuperwasser: Thank you for the opportunity to discuss these important matters. Understanding these dynamics is key to geopolitics today.