–

Democratic presidential candidate ⁣Kamala​ Harris has ‌found herself in the ⁣spotlight for her volatile statements on the conflict⁢ between Israel and the Palestinians. At election rallies in different states, ⁣she⁢ spoke ambiguously, changing emphasis depending⁣ on the audience.

Speaking in⁢ Michigan,‍ a state with a large Arab voter‍ base, Harris expressed support for‌ Palestinians’ right to ⁣statehood and condemned the “suffering in the Gaza ⁣Strip”: “I⁣ cannot remain indifferent to the suffering of Palestinians,” she said, vowing to​ work⁤ to end the conflict and improve ⁢conditions for⁢ the Palestinians.

At the same time, at a rally in Pennsylvania, ​where Jewish communities ​are strong,‌ Harris voiced the⁢ opposite position, emphasizing her support for Israel. “I​ will always defend Israel’s right⁤ to self-defense,” she said, adding that Israel must⁤ remain protected from threats from terrorist organizations.

In other meetings, Harris tried to take a more balanced⁤ position, saying her goal was to end the war while ensuring security for Israel and the Palestinians’ right to freedom and⁣ dignity. She noted that she and President Biden‍ are ⁤committed to a world in which suffering ⁢in the Middle East⁣ ends and both ​sides can exist ⁢in security and ‌peace.

Such statements ⁣raise questions about what policies Harris intends to pursue if she wins the election, and leave American voters with a⁤ dilemma ⁣over whether the candidate will truly stick to one line on such a sensitive issue in the United States.

Sure!⁣ To create an engaging interview, I’ll need some context and key information from the specific article you mentioned. Since I don’t have access to external content, ⁣could you⁢ please provide me ‌with the ‍main‌ details or points from the article? This ‍way, I can craft⁤ an interview that captures the essence of the topic.