Michel Barnier gathers his ministers in a seminar and promises “progress to decide better together”

by time news

On Monday morning,‍ 4 November, Michel Barnier gathered‍ his ministers in a seminar with ‌the aim of presenting, by⁤ the end ‌of the year, proposals ‌to be implemented⁣ over three years. The ‌members of the ⁣government arrived in Matignon ​before 9am, for a morning of⁣ work.

The Prime Minister,⁢ who⁢ has been ⁢concerned since his appointment two⁣ months​ ago ‌with the‍ urgency of preparing the 2025 budget,⁢ wants to show that he is planning beyond this deadline. And this, without worrying about the sword of Damocles of voting on a motion of censure in December, when he ‌will probably assume the ‍responsibility of his government to‌ finally ‍pass these dangerous⁣ financial laws.

“Five-year vision, three-year action”this is​ Matignon’s new ⁢leitmotif, in reference to 2029, ‍the date set for ⁢France’s return to ⁣European budget​ standards, and 2027, the next⁢ presidential election.

Lack of unity

After a‌ first seminar in September to prepare his ⁤general policy statement,‌ Michel Barnier wants ⁣through this second​ one⁤ “collective⁢ meeting”then a⁣ third in December, leading to “concrete proposals” ‌ to answer ” priority of the French ​» which will be presented⁤ in an ‌action⁤ plan, according to those around him.

On the menu, on⁤ Monday, of the⁢ forty ministers, five themes: State-community, work-social security, immigration-integration, overseas ‌and simplification.‌ A lead minister will manage ‍each theme and ⁢the ‌aim​ will be ⁢to⁣ define it ⁣ “one or two‌ priority measures” to be implemented, according to Matignon.

Two ministers ‍will have ‌to speak ​on the current context: starting with the minister delegate for Europe, Benjamin Haddad “European issues”, followed by the Minister of Economy, Antoine ⁢Armand, who will report on the annual meetings of‌ the International‍ Monetary‍ Fund (IMF) and the⁢ World Bank.

This lack of unity is found almost daily in the Assembly⁢ on budget texts that⁢ are ⁢poorly ​defended or even ⁢contested by part of the majority. ⁢The government has been defeated on numerous ⁣occasions on fiscal ​issues, the latest‌ example ⁢being the revision of employers’ contributions ‍rejected⁣ on Thursday by Macronists, the right and⁣ the National‍ Rally ‌(RN).

Read ⁣also | Article reserved for our ⁤subscribers Budget 2025: a crazy game between government and deputies

“It is not because we have an ​opinion that we are ‌an adversary”

The objective of ​the seminar is also to “ensure team spirit and collective spirit”according to ‌reports from government spokeswoman Maud Bregeon. ​“We will make progress to ⁣better⁤ decide together and listen to‍ each other before making decisions, despite extremely ‍urgent circumstances”promised the Prime Minister at the end of the meeting

⁢ ‍ News

“​ Politics “

Every week “Le Monde” analyzes current political issues ‍for‌ you

Register

“It is necessary that, in the group that has formed around Michel‍ Barnier, we try ‌to define ⁤what we‍ agree on so that a form of mobilization can be‍ unleashed”recognized on Sunday the leader of the MoDem deputies, Marc Fesneau, in⁢ “Political questions” (France Inter, The ‍worldFrance Télévisions), inviting⁢ the government to do so “take ⁢into account ⁤parliamentary‌ debates”for example the perpetuation of the surtax on high incomes voted⁤ by the left and the MoDem.

Deputies will resume consideration of the‍ revenue part of the Social Security budget on Monday, ‍resulting in a ‍probable ⁤rejection, which would be equivalent to rejecting the entire text.

The expenditure aspect would not be examined, which ⁤would spare the government a lost discussion on the postponement of the indexation of pensions to 1‍ July, which is reviled ‌from ‍all sides.

The ⁤deputies will then return⁤ to discussing state⁣ budget ‌revenues, while around ‌1,500 amendments remain to be ​discussed. A refusal ‌is expected, as the majority‍ in the commission does not support⁢ the⁤ billions of euros of additional revenue ‍voted⁤ for by the deputies of the New Popular Front.

Article reserved for our subscribers Pensions: Confusion in the National Assembly over repeal

Also in this case, the red light ‍would bring the entire text which would go to the Senate in its original version, before a joint commission so that the two ‍Chambers try to agree on⁢ a common version.

At the​ end of the process, however, the government​ should not be able to ⁣escape a ⁣49.3 ‌for the adoption‌ of its two budget texts,⁣ given that ⁢the left and the RN have already announced their⁢ intention to vote against.

The world ⁢with AFP

⁤ ‌ ‌ ‍ ⁣ ⁣ ⁣ ⁢ ​ Reuse this content

Interview between Time.news Editor and Political Expert on France’s Budget Challenges

Time.news Editor: Good morning and welcome to this special segment where we⁢ discuss the pressing political and economic ⁣issues in France. Today,​ we have with us Dr.⁢ Isabelle⁤ Laurent, a renowned expert​ in public policy and governance. Thank you for joining us, Dr. Laurent.

Dr. Isabelle Laurent: Good morning! Thank you for having me.

Editor: Let’s jump right in. There was a significant seminar held by Prime Minister Michel Barnier recently, focused on planning ‌for the 2025 budget and setting ​a strategic framework for three years. What do you think the government aims to achieve with this long-term vision?

Dr. Laurent: The seminar highlights Barnier’s intent to establish a clear trajectory for the government’s financial policies beyond the immediate term. By emphasizing a “five-year vision and three-year action” approach, he⁢ aims to reassure ⁢both citizens and policymakers that France is committed to returning to European ​budget ‌standards by 2029. ⁤This is particularly critical with⁤ the upcoming ​presidential election in 2027, which complicates​ legislative dynamics.

Editor: It seems like there’s considerable⁤ urgency from the government. Barnier has also accounted for potential political backlash, ⁤such as the looming motion of censure in December. How do you view the ‌government’s strategy ⁤in light of this ⁣impending vote?

Dr. Laurent: The strategy reflects a delicate balancing act. On one hand,​ there’s the urgency to advance economically significant ⁣legislation. On the other, the risk of political instability is palpable, given the fragmented support in the Assembly. ⁤The government’s approach to prepare comprehensive proposals while being mindful of ⁢dissent ‌within the ‌majority suggests they recognize the complexity of garnering enough parliamentary backing.

Editor: ‍Speaking of the fractured environment in the‌ Assembly, can you elaborate on‌ the ⁣challenges Barnier faces related ‍to unity among ministers ⁤and parties?

Dr. Laurent: Absolutely. ‍The lack of unity is a recurring theme, as seen from Barnier’s seminar discussions covering various crucial ​topics. The⁣ government’s inability to pass key fiscal measures—like the⁤ recent rejection of the revision of employers’ contributions—illustrates the challenges of intra-party cohesion. ‍Different factions ⁤within the majority may oppose certain budget proposals, creating a scenario where even the government’s proposals may face​ strong resistance.

Editor: The ​seminar’s stated goal is to ensure “team spirit and collective spirit.” How important is this unity for the success of Barnier’s plans?

Dr.​ Laurent: ‌ It’s essential. For Barnier’s initiatives‌ to materialize effectively, a collective approach within the cabinet is necessary. ​The Prime Minister’s emphasis on collaboration signals that the government aims ‌not only to ⁤push through legislation ‌but also to foster ⁤camaraderie to strengthen the group’s ‍resolve. If ministers feel heard and included, it could improve both morale and the ultimate coherence of the policies presented.

Editor: There’s been a call from government officials like Marc Fesneau to‌ ensure that parliamentary debates are accounted for in decision-making. What implications ⁢does‌ this have for governance ⁢in France?

Dr. Laurent: Fesneau’s remarks highlight an increasing recognition of the importance of dialogue ⁣with ⁢parliamentarians. This could lead to a more democratic approach to governance, where diverse ‌opinions contribute to robust policy-making. If the government can integrate relevant feedback from various factions, it may foster more stability and a greater sense of ownership over financial laws, improving their chances of passage.

Editor: as we see the French deputies scheduled to resume consideration ⁢of the Social Security budget, what are your predictions‌ for the legislative session?

Dr. Laurent: Given ⁤the tumultuous atmosphere, I ‌would ⁣anticipate​ further tension. If the⁢ deputies reject the revenue part of the Social ‌Security budget, it could effectively derail ⁤the entire discussion, forcing the government into a tight corner. ⁤The focus‌ will need to ⁤be not just on winning votes but also on strategically ⁣navigating the political landscape ‌to maintain critical support for essential economic legislation.

Editor: ​Thank⁣ you,⁣ Dr. Laurent, for your insights on these pressing matters. It sounds⁣ like we⁢ are in for an ⁣interesting political​ season in France⁢ as the government navigates complex​ legislative waters.

Dr. Laurent: Thank you for having me. It will indeed⁢ be a crucial time for French politics, ⁢and I look forward to seeing how it unfolds.

Editor: Stay tuned for ‌more updates as we continue to cover the developments in France.

You may also like

Leave a Comment