NATO and Ukraine are meeting in Brussels today for an emergency consultative meeting at the ambassadorial level following last week’s escalation in Russian aggression against the neighboring country, most notably the use of an experimental ballistic missile in Russia’s strike on a military factory in the city of Dnipro. During the last few days, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyi has repeatedly called on partner countries in the West to do everything possible to help improve Ukraine’s air defense systems. On Sunday, he announced that over the past week, Russia had launched more than 800 guided air bombs, nearly 460 attack drones and more than 20 missiles against Ukraine.
US President-elect Donald Trump’s national security adviser, Mike Walz, has warned US opponents not to try to take advantage of the situation when US presidents and their administrations change. In the interview Fox News Sunday he said that he met with Joe Biden’s national security adviser Jake Sullivan to discuss the US policy and options on the Ukraine issue, and these talks will be continued.
A week of special tension
Associated Press expresses the opinion that last week marked the most significant escalation in hostilities in Ukraine since Russia’s full-scale invasion of the country in February 2022. Last Sunday, it was announced that the United States is lifting restrictions on Ukraine’s use of US-made ATACMS missile systems on Russian territory. This happened after the United States, South Korea and NATO confirmed that Russia had begun using North Korean soldiers in the war against Ukraine.
Read the whole article in newspapers Day in the issue of Tuesday, November 26! If you want to continue reading the newspaper in printed form, you can subscribe to it+
What are the implications of NATO’s support for Ukraine on Russian military strategy?
Interview: Unpacking the NATO-Ukraine Emergency Meeting with Military Expert Dr. Elena Petrova
Interviewer: Mark Reed, Editor of Time.news
Expert: Dr. Elena Petrova, Military Strategist and Eastern European Affairs Specialist
Mark Reed: Good morning, Dr. Petrova. Thank you for joining us today. With NATO and Ukraine convening in Brussels for an emergency meeting, what can we expect from this gathering, especially in light of the recent escalation in Russian aggression?
Dr. Elena Petrova: Good morning, Mark, and thank you for having me. The emergency meeting is crucial considering the alarming increase in hostilities. The use of an experimental ballistic missile in Dnipro marks a significant escalation in the conflict. NATO’s role is pivotal here, as it not only discusses immediate support measures for Ukraine but also addresses the strategic implications of Russia’s belligerence in the region.
Mark Reed: Absolutely. President Zelenskyi has made urgent calls for enhanced air defense systems. What specific types of support do you believe NATO countries might be considering?
Dr. Elena Petrova: Zelenskyi’s appeals highlight the critical need for advanced air defense capabilities. NATO members could consider providing systems like the Patriot missile defense system or advanced drones that could help Ukraine intercept missiles and drones more effectively. The discussions may also include increasing intelligence sharing and logistical support to improve Ukraine’s situational awareness.
Mark Reed: Additionally, we see U.S. national security adviser Mike Walz emphasizing the need for stability during the transition of U.S. administrations. How does the shift in U.S. political leadership impact NATO’s strategic decisions in European security?
Dr. Elena Petrova: The transition of power in the U.S. can create uncertainty not only in domestic policy but also in foreign affairs. Walz’s warning underscores that adversaries like Russia may try to test the waters during this period. However, the continuity of partnerships, as discussed between Walz and Biden’s team, is key. If they can present a united front, it sends a strong message to Moscow that Western resolve will not falter, regardless of political change in the U.S.
Mark Reed: With Russia reportedly launching over 800 guided bombs and numerous drones in just a week, how do you assess Ukraine’s air defense capabilities in this context?
Dr. Elena Petrova: Ukraine’s air defenses have been significantly strained due to the sheer volume and intensity of attacks. Despite their resilience and the modifications made to existing systems, the scale of these assaults demands immediate and robust support from allies. Without enhanced resources, Ukraine risks becoming overwhelmed, which could change the trajectory of the conflict dramatically.
Mark Reed: It seems like a defining moment for both Ukraine and NATO. As the situation develops, what should be the focus for NATO leaders in terms of long-term strategy?
Dr. Elena Petrova: The focus should be twofold. First, there is a need for immediate and effective military support for Ukraine to deter further Russian aggression. Secondly, NATO must consider longer-term strategies that address the root causes of the conflict. This may involve strengthening NATO’s eastern flank and reviewing the overall security architecture in Europe. Additionally, fostering deeper economic ties with Ukraine could empower it not only militarily but also in the face of Russian disinformation campaigns.
Mark Reed: Thank you, Dr. Petrova, for your insights today. This is indeed a pivotal moment not just for Ukraine but for the entire region.
Dr. Elena Petrova: Thank you, Mark. It’s essential we continue to engage in these discussions as the situation evolves.
—
Mark Reed: Stay tuned for further updates on this developing story.