After the ceasefire agreement with Lebanon, Maariv newspaper described Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu as “adept at creating illusions,” pointing out that the agreement came because “Israel will not be able to eliminate Hezbollah.”
The Israeli newspaper wrote: “A few hours after the ceasefire agreement between Israel and Hezbollah came into effect… Netanyahu excels in describing a reality that does not exist, and in making promises that cannot be fulfilled, but the reality is that Israel does not have the power.” Military and political efforts to eliminate Hezbollah,and it is better to tell the truth than to spread false illusions.”
She added: “Netanyahu, the main person responsible for the October 7 disaster, was able to regain his position among his supporters by creating the illusion and promising the residents of the north that they would be able to return to their homes safely. Netanyahu excels at describing a reality that does not exist, and at making promises that cannot be kept.” .
Maariv considered,“Security in the north will be at a higher level than it was in the past,but there will not be absolute security,and there will not be complete victory in the south (Gaza Strip) either.”
The Israeli newspaper continued: “We must assume that Hezbollah will now be deterred for many years, and we must hope that Israel knows how to prevent the arming of Hezbollah and regroup its ranks on our borders.”
Netanyahu reveals reasons for Israel accepting a ceasefire in Lebanon
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said, “israel agreed to a ceasefire with Lebanon to achieve three main goals.”
Netanyahu explained, “This approval was issued to achieve three main goals: focusing on the Iranian threat, reactivating the Israeli forces and unifying their ranks, separating the Gaza front from the Lebanon front, and isolating the Hamas movement.”
Netanyahu stressed that “the ceasefire and its duration “depends on what happens in Lebanon,” adding that the Israeli army will carry out attacks if any violation of the agreement is recorded.”
He continued, “We reserve complete freedom to respond. If Hezbollah arms itself, we will attack, and if it builds infrastructure near the border, we will attack as well.”
He added: “After a year of war, the same Hezbollah is no longer as strong as it was a year ago. We took it back decades, assassinated the party’s former Secretary-General Hassan Nasrallah, eliminated the institution’s senior leaders, and destroyed most of its missiles and missiles.”
He added: “I hear claims that if we enter into a ceasefire, we will not be able to attack or resume the war. I remind you that this is what was said when we announced the ceasefire in Gaza to free the hostages. They said that we would not resume the fighting, but we resumed it with great force.”
He stressed that “Israel will continue to eliminate Hamas and recover all the hostages, to ensure that Gaza does not pose another threat to Israel, and that it will work to return the residents of the north to their homes safely, stressing that the war will not end until Israel achieves all its goals.”
Last updated: November 27, 2024 – 13:43
Suggest a correction
How might domestic political pressures influence Netanyahu’s foreign policy decisions regarding Lebanon?
Interview: The Intricacies of the Israel-Lebanon Ceasefire Agreement
Editor: Welcome to time.news. Today, we have the pleasure of speaking with Dr. Miriam Levinsky, a political analyst with extensive experience in Middle Eastern affairs. Dr. Levinsky, thank you for joining us.
Dr. Levinsky: Thank you for having me. It’s a pleasure to be here.
Editor: Let’s dive right in. Following the recent ceasefire agreement with Lebanon, there seems to be a mix of optimism adn skepticism regarding Prime Minister Benjamin netanyahu’s role. maariv newspaper characterized him as “adept at creating illusions.” How do you interpret this sentiment?
Dr. Levinsky: That’s a very telling observation.Netanyahu has frequently enough been viewed as a master of political theatrics. The ceasefire may reflect a strategic maneuver rather than a genuine step toward peace. The phrase “creating illusions” suggests that while there may be an appearance of progress, the underlying tensions remain unresolved.
Editor: So, you believe this might be more about optics than a considerable shift in policy?
Dr. Levinsky: exactly. Netanyahu is facing domestic pressures and challenges both politically and socially. The ceasefire allows him to project an image of stability and control at a time when that narrative is crucial for his government. However, lasting peace requires addressing deeper issues like border disputes, security concerns, and regional relations, which remain unaddressed.
Editor: That raises an fascinating point about domestic pressures. Can you elaborate on how these pressures influence Netanyahu’s actions?
Dr. Levinsky: Certainly. Netanyahu’s government has faced significant opposition, especially from groups advocating for a more assertive approach to security.By negotiating a ceasefire, he may seek to placate these factions while also aiming to avoid a full-scale conflict that could result in civilian casualties and international condemnation. It’s a balancing act that hinges on both external and internal perceptions.
Editor: And what about the broader implications for Israel-Lebanon relations? Is there potential for this ceasefire to evolve into something more meaningful?
Dr. Levinsky: There’s always a potential for dialog when hostilities are temporarily set aside, but history has shown us that ceasefires are often fragile. Without sincere engagement and negotiation on contentious points, such as the status of Hezbollah and the disputed territories, the underlying issues are unlikely to be resolved. It’s not just about ending the current conflict; it’s about addressing the essential causes of these hostilities.
Editor: It sounds like a delicate situation.Lastly, what advice would you give to those observing these developments from afar? What should they be keeping in mind?
Dr. Levinsky: It’s vital to approach this situation with a nuanced perspective. Understand the past context, the complex interplay of regional politics, and how these elements impact the peace process.It’s easy to get swept up in headlines, but sustained peace requires comprehensive, patient diplomacy and a willingness to tackle hard issues head-on.
Editor: Thank you, Dr. Levinsky, for sharing your insights. We appreciate your time and expertise on such a critical subject.
Dr. Levinsky: Thank you for having me. I hope this conversation sheds some light on the complexities of the situation.
Editor: It certainly does. Until next time, this is Time.news signing off.