The debate over voting rights is intensifying as the Senate considers the Safeguard American Voter Eligibility Act, or SAVE America Act. A central claim made by Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., regarding the potential impact of the legislation – that it would force Americans to register to vote in person, affecting 95% of voters – has drawn scrutiny. While the bill does mandate in-person presentation of documentary proof of citizenship for voter registration, a closer look at federal data reveals Schumer’s assertion about current in-person registration rates is a significant underestimation. Understanding the nuances of how Americans currently register to vote, and how the SAVE America Act would alter that process, is crucial to evaluating the potential consequences of the proposed law.
The SAVE America Act, passed by the House in February with strong support from former President Donald Trump, aims to address concerns about noncitizen voting, a phenomenon that, while rarely occurs, has been repeatedly highlighted by proponents of stricter voting regulations. The bill stipulates that individuals seeking to register to vote for federal elections must present documentary proof of U.S. Citizenship “in person” to the appropriate election official. This requirement, critics argue, could create substantial barriers to voter registration, particularly for those who may not readily have access to the necessary documentation or the ability to travel to election offices.
What the SAVE America Act Requires
The text of the bill is specific: no one can be registered to vote in a federal election without presenting documentary proof of U.S. Citizenship in person. This seemingly straightforward requirement raises several practical questions. Eliza Sweren-Becker, deputy director for the voting rights and election program at the Brennan Center for Justice, points out that the impact could extend beyond new voters. Depending on how states interpret the law, even individuals who have previously registered but have moved within the state – or even to a new voting precinct – might be required to re-register and provide proof of citizenship in person. The ambiguity surrounding who qualifies as an “election official” also remains a concern, potentially impacting where voters can fulfill this requirement – whether it’s limited to dedicated election workers or extends to employees at motor vehicle agencies, a common location for voter registration.
Current In-Person Registration Rates: A Closer Look
Schumer’s claim that only 5% of Americans register to vote in person stems from a report by the Center for American Progress, which utilized data from a 2022 survey by the Election Assistance Commission (EAC). However, this figure only accounts for in-person registration specifically at election offices. The most recent data, from the EAC’s 2024 Election Administration and Voting Survey, paints a more comprehensive picture. The survey reveals that 6% of voters registered at election offices, an additional 2.2% registered at polling places and voting sites, 1% at public assistance offices, and smaller percentages at disability services, armed forces recruitment offices, and other public facilities (totaling 1.8%). Combined, these in-person methods account for 11.2% of registrations.
Matthew Weil, vice president for governance at the Bipartisan Policy Center, emphasizes that “clearly, more than the 5% or 6% going to elections offices are registering in person.” a significant 30.7% of registrations occur through motor vehicle agencies, a process that often, though not always, involves an in-person visit. While the EAC data doesn’t specify how many of these motor vehicle registrations are completed online versus in person, experts believe a substantial portion require a physical presence. This suggests the actual percentage of in-person voter registrations before the 2024 election likely falls between 11% and 42%, significantly higher than Schumer’s stated 5%.
The EAC data also highlights the growing popularity of alternative registration methods. Automatic voter registration, where individuals are automatically registered unless they opt out, accounted for 25.2% of registrations. Online registration comprised 13.9%, while mail, email, and fax registrations accounted for 8.3%, and voter registration drives contributed 2%. Lisa Bryant, a political scientist at California State University-Fresno, notes that these convenient options – which could be curtailed by the SAVE America Act – rely on providing identification information or presenting ID when voting, rather than requiring in-person documentation for initial registration.
Implications and Next Steps
Schumer’s statement that the SAVE America Act would impact the 95% of Americans who don’t register in person is therefore misleading. While the bill wouldn’t force 95% of voters to *begin* registering in person, it would likely require a substantial number of currently registered voters to re-verify their citizenship in person, potentially creating logistical hurdles and suppressing voter turnout. The extent of this impact will depend on how states implement the law and interpret its provisions regarding residency and acceptable forms of documentation.
The Senate is expected to continue debate on the SAVE America Act in the coming weeks. Key areas of contention will likely include the bill’s potential impact on voter access, the ambiguity surrounding its implementation, and the constitutionality of requiring in-person documentation for voter registration. Further clarification from the Department of Justice regarding the bill’s compliance with federal voting rights laws is also anticipated. The outcome of this debate will have significant implications for the future of voting rights in the United States.
This is a developing story. We will continue to update this article as more information becomes available. If you have questions about voter registration requirements in your state, please visit the website of your state’s election office.
Worth a look
