Delaware is moving to close a significant regulatory gap in its environmental laws following a landmark U.S. Supreme Court ruling that stripped federal protections from millions of acres of wetlands across the country. Legislation introduced by Representative Sean Hansen seeks to establish state-level protections for nontidal wetlands in Delaware, ensuring that these critical ecosystems remain shielded from unregulated development regardless of federal jurisdiction.
For years, Delaware has maintained a robust framework for protecting its tidal wetlands—those areas influenced by the rise and fall of the ocean. However, nontidal wetlands, such as inland marshes, bogs, and swamps, have historically fallen under the purview of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) via the Clean Water Act. That reliance on federal oversight became a liability in May 2023, when the Supreme Court issued its decision in Sackett v. EPA.
The Sackett ruling significantly narrowed the definition of “Waters of the United States” (WOTUS), removing federal protections for any wetland that does not have a “continuous surface connection” to a relatively permanent body of water. In practical terms, this means many “isolated” wetlands—which are nonetheless vital for flood control and biodiversity—are no longer protected under federal law, leaving them vulnerable to being filled or drained without a permit.
Addressing the ‘Sackett Gap’ in Delaware
The Hansen bill is designed to act as a legislative safety net. By creating a state-managed permit system for nontidal wetlands, Delaware would no longer be dependent on the fluctuating definitions of federal law to protect its inland water resources. Under the proposed framework, the Delaware Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control (DNREC) would likely be tasked with overseeing the regulation and permitting process.
Currently, the distinction between tidal and nontidal protections creates a fragmented map of conservation. Although a coastal marsh might be strictly protected under state law, a freshwater wetland just a few miles inland could suddenly find itself without any legal shield if it fails the Supreme Court’s “continuous surface connection” test. The Hansen bill aims to standardize these protections, treating the ecological value of the wetland as the primary concern rather than its proximity to a navigable waterway.
The Ecological Stakes of Nontidal Wetlands
Environmental advocates argue that the loss of these areas would have cascading effects on Delaware’s infrastructure and natural heritage. Nontidal wetlands serve several critical functions that benefit the broader population:
- Flood Mitigation: These areas act as natural sponges, absorbing excess rainfall and reducing the risk of flash flooding in residential and agricultural areas.
- Water Filtration: Wetlands filter pollutants and sediments from runoff before they reach larger river systems and the Chesapeake Bay.
- Biodiversity Hubs: Many rare species of plants and wildlife rely exclusively on the specific chemistry and hydrology of nontidal bogs and marshes.
- Carbon Sequestration: Wetland soils are highly efficient at trapping carbon, making them essential tools in the state’s climate resilience strategies.
Balancing Conservation and Development
While the bill is welcomed by conservationists, the transition to state-level oversight introduces new questions regarding land-use rights and the permitting process. Developers and landowners often express concern that adding another layer of state bureaucracy could delay projects or increase costs. The challenge for the Delaware General Assembly will be to create a system that is rigorous enough to protect the environment but streamlined enough to avoid unnecessary economic bottlenecks.
The proposed legislation would likely require a system of permits for any activity that involves dredging or filling nontidal wetlands. This would mirror the existing federal process but would be administered locally, allowing the state to tailor its requirements to Delaware’s specific geography and ecological needs.
| Wetland Type | Current Protection Status | Proposed Change (Hansen Bill) |
|---|---|---|
| Tidal Wetlands | Protected by State Law | No Change (Remains Protected) |
| Connected Nontidal | Protected by Federal Law (WOTUS) | Dual State and Federal Oversight |
| Isolated Nontidal | Unprotected (Post-Sackett) | New State-Level Protection |
Looking Ahead: The Legislative Path
The success of the bill depends on its ability to navigate the committee process and secure a majority in the General Assembly. Lawmakers are currently weighing the specific definitions of what constitutes a “protected wetland” to avoid overly broad mandates that could trigger legal challenges from property rights advocates.
As the state evaluates the scale of the “unprotected” acreage left in the wake of the Sackett decision, the Hansen bill represents a strategic shift toward environmental autonomy. By codifying these protections into state law, Delaware ensures that its ecological safeguards are insulated from shifts in federal judicial philosophy.
The next confirmed step for the legislation will be its review by the relevant House and Senate environmental committees, where public testimony from stakeholders and DNREC officials is expected to shape the final language of the bill.
This article is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice regarding land use or environmental regulations. For specific guidance, consult the Delaware Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control.
Do you believe state-level protections are the best way to handle the gaps left by federal rulings? Share your thoughts in the comments or share this story on social media to join the conversation.
