Morena national leadership has launched a coordinated political offensive to remove Chihuahua Governor María Eugenia Campos from office, signaling a sharp escalation in the conflict between the ruling national party and the state’s PAN-led administration. During a mobilization in the center of Chihuahua City, Ariadna Montiel, the national leader of Morena, announced that the party will begin the process of gathering Morena firmas para destituir a Maru Campos as part of a broader push for a juicio político, or impeachment trial.
The announcement was framed not as a standard legal filing, but as the establishment of a “tribunal popular” (popular tribunal). This rhetoric suggests that Morena intends to leverage public sentiment and grassroots mobilization to pressure the state legislature, blending legal mechanisms with political theater to challenge the legitimacy of the current gubernatorial administration.
The move comes amid a climate of heightened tension in northern Mexico, where the ideological divide between the Morena-led federal government and PAN-governed states has frequently manifested in budgetary disputes and conflicting security strategies. By calling for a juicio político, Morena is moving beyond rhetorical criticism and attempting to utilize the constitutional tools available for the removal of an elected official.
The Strategy Behind the ‘Tribunal Popular’
The decision to organize a march and declare a “popular tribunal” serves a dual purpose for Morena. First, it allows the party to demonstrate its organizational strength and presence within Chihuahua, a state where political competition remains fierce. Second, it creates a public record of discontent that the party can use to justify the formal impeachment process before the State Congress.
Ariadna Montiel’s leadership in this initiative underscores the national importance Morena places on Chihuahua. As the party seeks to consolidate power across all levels of government, the removal of a high-profile PAN governor would serve as a significant symbolic and strategic victory. The focus on collecting signatures indicates a strategy of “citizen-led” pressure, intended to make the impeachment appear as a mandate from the people rather than a purely partisan maneuver.
While the party has called for the removal of Governor Campos, the specific legal grounds for the impeachment have not been fully detailed in the initial announcement. Typically, a juicio político requires evidence of serious misconduct, corruption, or a failure to uphold constitutional duties. Morena’s ability to translate “popular discontent” into a legally viable case will be the primary hurdle in the coming months.
The Legal Path to Impeachment in Chihuahua
The process for removing a governor in Mexico is complex and requires a high threshold of legislative support. Under the Constitution of the State of Chihuahua, a juicio político is a quasi-judicial process handled by the state legislature. It is not a simple vote of no confidence but a formal trial based on specific accusations.
For the effort to gather Morena firmas para destituir a Maru Campos to result in an actual removal, the party must navigate several strict legal stages. The collection of signatures generally serves as a political catalyst to convince legislators to initiate the process, as the formal power to impeach rests with the deputies of the State Congress.
| Stage | Requirement | Objective |
|---|---|---|
| Accusation | Formal filing of charges by a legislative body or authorized entity. | Establish legal grounds for the trial. |
| Admission | Majority vote by the State Congress to accept the charges. | Determine if the case has sufficient merit to proceed. |
| Trial | Evidentiary hearing and defense presentation. | Verify the truth of the accusations. |
| Verdict | Qualified majority vote for conviction. | Removal from office and potential disqualification. |
Given the current composition of the Chihuahua State Congress, Morena faces a steep climb to achieve the necessary votes. The success of this initiative depends heavily on whether the party can sway independent legislators or prove systemic failures within the governor’s administration that transcend party lines.
Political Implications for Northern Mexico
The push to remove Maru Campos is not happening in a vacuum. Chihuahua has long been a battleground for the two dominant political forces in Mexico. The PAN has historically maintained a strong foothold in the north, while Morena has expanded its reach through a platform of social transformation and federal alignment.
Analysts suggest that this move may be timed to influence upcoming electoral cycles or to weaken the PAN’s infrastructure in the region. By framing the governor’s removal as a necessity for the “people,” Morena is attempting to shift the narrative from a partisan struggle to a moral imperative. This strategy mirrors similar tactics used by the party in other states to challenge opposition governors.
For Governor Campos, the challenge will be to maintain the support of her coalition and the state legislature while countering the narrative of the “popular tribunal.” Any perceived weakness in her administration’s response could embolden Morena’s signature-gathering campaign and provide the momentum needed to move the case into the legislative chamber.
What Remains Uncertain
Despite the boldness of the announcement, several critical questions remain. First, the specific “crimes” or “failures” that will form the basis of the juicio político have yet to be formalized in a legal filing. Second, the actual number of signatures required to exert meaningful pressure on the Congress remains undefined, as signature drives for impeachment are often more symbolic than legally binding in the initial stages.
the reaction from the federal judiciary remains a wild card. If the impeachment process is viewed as a politically motivated attack without legal basis, it could lead to a series of injunctions (*amparos*) that could stall the proceedings for years.
The next critical checkpoint for this development will be the formal presentation of the signature lists to the State Congress and the filing of the official accusation. These steps will determine whether the “popular tribunal” remains a campaign tool or becomes a genuine legal threat to the governorship.
This article provides information for journalistic purposes and does not constitute legal advice regarding the constitutional processes of the State of Chihuahua.
We invite readers to share their perspectives on this developing political situation in the comments below and share this report across social platforms to keep the conversation going.
