Google’s Fitbit Air, a screenless health tracker, has been tested by Norwegian outlets TEK and Nettavisen, highlighting its minimalist design, focus on sleep metrics, and trade-offs between convenience and functionality.
Nettavisen noted its near-invisible presence on the wrist, comparing it to a stoffarmbånd (“fabric band”) with a sensor. Both outlets emphasized its comfort, particularly during sleep, though Nettavisen acknowledged its unassuming aesthetic, calling it relativt komfortabelt (relatively comfortable) but lacking visual appeal. The device is made of recycled polycarbonate and textile with a stainless steel clasp, as noted by TEK. Nettavisen observed that det føles klumpete når du skal sove (it feels clunky when you try to sleep) with many smartwatches, but the Fitbit Air gjør ikke det (does not). TEK highlighted its mykere og mindre forstyrrende (softer and less disruptive) feel compared to competitors like the Polar Loop Gen 2, while Nettavisen noted its fraværet av skjerm (absence of a screen) as both a strength and a limitation, depending on user needs.
Vi har testet Google Fitbit Air
Functionality and App Integration
The Fitbit Air syncs with Google Health, a unified app that consolidates data on sleep, activity, and heart metrics. TEK praised the app’s superpolert (“superpolished”) interface and free access to core features, including AI insights, which it contrasted with competitors like Oura and Whoop that require subscriptions. Nettavisen noted that while the app provides detailed sleep analysis, its reliance on mobile connectivity for real-time data processing could be a drawback. TEK reported that alle kjernedata er gratis (all core data is free), while Nettavisen emphasized its fokus på søvn, restitusjon, puls og generell helse (focus on sleep, recovery, pulse, and general health). The device is designed to be worn constantly without requiring user interaction, with a battery life of up to one week. Nettavisen noted that det er ingen tvil om at å følge med på helsen har blitt en skikkelig «greie» (there is no doubt that tracking health has become a serious “thing”), and Google’s acquisition of Fitbit has positioned it as a leader in health tracking.
User Experience and Comparisons
Fitbit Air, Google
Users accustomed to smartwatches may find the Fitbit Air limiting. Nettavisen observed that du kan ikke se klokken. You can’t read messages), making it unsuitable for those reliant on real-time notifications. However, the lack of screen interruptions was framed as a digital detox by Nettavisen, appealing to users seeking minimalism. Comparisons to the Oura Ring and Whoop were mixed. TEK noted that while the Fitbit Air leverer godt på søvn (performs well on sleep), its fraværet av skjerm (absence of a screen) could deter users prioritizing on-the-go data. Nettavisen highlighted its lavere pris (“lower price”) as a key advantage, though it did not specify exact figures. Both outlets agreed that the device is best suited for users prioritizing sleep tracking and basic health insights over multifunctional smartwatch features. TEK noted that det er lite å si på pågangen i markedet av nye, slanke, skjermløse helsemålere (there is little to say about the surge in the market for new, slim, screenless health trackers), while Nettavisen observed that Garmin også fått lansert sin egen også siden sist, Cirqa (Garmin has also launched its own since last, Cirqa).
Release and Availability
The device comes in four colors: sort, lavendel, berry og fog (black, lavender, berry, and fog). Nettavisen noted that Google har bygget hele Fitbit Air rundt søvn og restitusjon (Google has built the entire Fitbit Air around sleep and recovery), and TEK emphasized its overraskende god (surprisingly good) performance in an acid test. Both outlets concluded that the Fitbit Air represents a bold departure from traditional smartwatches, offering a minimalist approach to health tracking at a budget-friendly price.
