Even if the Supreme Court says ‘disobedient’ police? If section 66A is not valid..? |IT Act 66A| Cyber ​​Crime | Supreme Court

According to Article 144 of the Constitution, the authorities of the country are responsible for implementing the judgments of the Supreme Court. However, there are police officers who do not obey the Supreme Court? It is clear again and again that there is. This is evidenced by Section 66A of the Information Technology (IT) Act. In 2012, a law student named Shreya Singhal approached the Supreme Court with a Public Interest Litigation against Section 66A of the IT Act. Here was the background: Section 66A provided for imprisonment of up to three years and a fine for making inflammatory comments. A boy named Shaheen Dhada posted a comment on social media against Mumbai’s coming to a standstill when Shiv Sena leader Bal Thackeray passed away. A kid named Rinu Sreen liked it. Both the people were arrested by the police in Palghar, Maharashtra. Applied Section 66A. It was then that Shreya petitioned the Supreme Court to examine the constitutional validity of this section.