A ‘Civil War’ heading towards catastrophe… Kim Min-jeon, in front of Korea, “Public opinion manipulation like Druking”

by times news cr
People Power Party representative Han⁤ Dong-hoon (right) is ⁣looking at Supreme Council member Kim Min-jeon (left) who is speaking regarding the controversy over the People Power⁢ Party member bulletin board at the Supreme Council meeting held at the National Assembly in Yeouido, Seoul on the morning of ⁤the 28th. 2024.11.28 Reporter Lee Hoon-gu [email protected]

The ‍conflict is ‍intensifying as the‍ all-out factional war between the pro-Chin (Chin Han⁢ Dong-hoon) faction and the pro-Yoon (pro-Yoon Seok-yeol) ​faction‌ surrounding the controversy over‍ the People Power Party member ⁣bulletin board is coupled with⁣ the theory⁤ of a link to the Kim Kun-hee Special Prosecutor Act. Regarding the pro-Yoon⁤ faction’s attack ​on the party member bulletin board, the pro-Yoon faction⁣ said, ⁣“Representative Han Dong-Hoon has reached a critical ⁣point. The claim was made publicly that “the nuance of the Special Prosecutor Kim Kun-hee Act has changed slightly.” While the Democratic Party⁢ of Korea is pushing for a re-vote on the Kim Kun-hee‌ Special Prosecutor Act⁣ at the plenary session on ⁤the 10th⁢ of next month, it is asserting ‌the‌ possibility of a change in Representative Han’s position due​ to the pro-Yoon ‌faction’s ⁣offensive. In response, pro-Yoongye also objected, saying, ⁤“It is an ⁢obvious act that is linked to the Special Prosecutor Kim Kun-hee⁢ Act.” Representative Han responded‌ to the single-team ⁢response to the Special Prosecution Act, ⁤saying, “I won’t talk about that issue ​right ‍now.”

Supreme Council member Kim Min-jeon, pro-Yoon-gye, directly attacked Representative Han again at the Supreme Council meeting on this day, saying, “In the ⁣digital space, over-representation by‌ a minority can occur, so there has been manipulation of public opinion such as‍ druking.” As the division in the party deepened, floor leader Choo Kyung-ho, who was pro-Yoon, told lawmakers, “Let’s⁣ take some‍ kind of cooling off and have time ⁢to think.” In response, an‍ official from the ⁣pro-Yoon faction⁢ said, “The pro-Yoon faction lawmakers ⁢who have been making a fuss must⁢ first restrain themselves.”

● In response to a question about ‌Korea’s ‘special prosecutor’s​ departure list’,⁣ “I‌ won’t say anything⁤ now.”

Representative Han met ⁤with reporters that day ⁣and was ⁣asked, ‍”There are reports‌ that there are Yongsan⁤ forces trying to ⁢bring ⁣down the party leader and‍ that⁤ the representative’s stance on the Special Prosecution Act must change to respond.” He answered, “That’s ⁢not what I said.” Representative​ Han⁣ said, “There is a prospect that⁤ voting ⁣will be left to individual⁣ lawmakers in a way that does⁤ not actively crack down⁤ on stray votes,” but said, ‌“I will⁣ not

In the pro-Yoon faction, following the pro-Yoon faction’s offensive to put pressure ‌on Representative Han, ‍suspicions were raised about the Yongsan​ Presidential⁢ Office and an argument ⁤was made to the effect that‍ ‘the single‌ team under the Kim Kun-hee Special Prosecutor’s Office could ⁢be shaken.’ Vice President ⁣for Organization Jeong Seong-guk said, “There was ⁤no doubt about the ⁢‘unity’ until Supreme Council Member Kim’s remarks⁣ on ‌the‌ 25th,” and added, “I think we will have to wait a few days⁣ to see if there ​is ‍any change in‍ Representative Han’s mind.”

Qin Yun-gye protested. Rep. Kwon‌ Seong-dong met with reporters on this day and said, “The‍ Democratic Party’s grand strategy ⁣is to‍ cover the election⁣ as ‌a ‍crime while impeachment⁣ is accomplished through a special prosecution and Representative Lee⁣ Jae-myung comes‍ to power ‍through an election.” “Doing so will ‌result in huge​ repercussions,” he said.

● Kyung-ho Choo “Let’s have a cooler for the party ​member bulletin board”

On this day, Supreme ‍Commissioner Kim mentioned ‘trucking and manipulation of​ public opinion’ at ⁣the‍ highest level, and in relation to the article ‍saying that he would be sued if he wrote an article demanding that Representative Han resign, he said, “If there is an error in that article, who is responsible for‍ it?” “This ⁣is something that reporters and reporters must consider,”‍ he said. Representative Han asked three days ago to “make a statement to confirm the facts,” but this was refuted. Representative Han, who heard this remark, burst into ‍laughter, and Kim ‌Jong-hyuk, a close friend of the Supreme Council, frowned.

Pro-Yoongye continued to pressure⁢ Representative Han, saying ⁢he was showing a “cowardly attitude” regarding the party member ⁣bulletin board ⁢issue. Rep. Kwon said, “Representative Han ​has the key to solving this problem,” and added, “If the party refuses to​ disclose it on the ​grounds that it will create strife within the party, it will be ‍a‌ serious blow to⁤ Representative Han’s leadership.”

Referring to the suspicions of Myung Tae-gyun’s manipulation of public opinion, which ⁤involved President‌ Yoon Seok-yeol and ‍his wife and⁢ many pro-Yoon ⁤lawmakers, ⁣Representative Han ⁣counterattacked, saying,​ “I will do my best ⁣to prevent a second ⁣Myung Tae-gyun from emerging.” Representative Han said, “I feel sorry to the ​people for the situation in which a political broker like Mr. Myeong was ​able to operate,” and added, “It is​ an old-fashioned politics‍ that ‍must be overcome, and we will do so without fail.”

In the pro-Yoon faction, ​an order was issued to refrain from factional conflict in consideration of ⁢the re-election of the Kim Kun-hee⁢ Special ‍Prosecutor Act. ⁤Representative ‌Choo met with reporters after the general meeting of lawmakers and said, “I asked lawmakers and ⁣party officials to refrain from expressing external opinions for the time being (on the issue of the party member bulletin board), and most lawmakers agreed.” However, a key member of the pro-friendly group said, “We will see whether⁢ the pro-friendly group follows the self-restraint order.”

Hot news now

  • What are the main concerns ⁤raised by members of ‍the Supreme Council regarding Representative ⁤Han’s leadership?

    It seems that the political⁢ tensions within the pro-Yoon faction ⁢and its ⁣ongoing conflict with Representative Han have reached a ‍critical point. Members of the ‌Supreme Council, particularly‍ Kim Min-jeon, have openly criticized Han, highlighting concerns about political manipulation and ⁤the overrepresentation of minorities in digital spaces. Meanwhile, floor⁣ leader Choo Kyung-ho⁣ is calling for a cooling-off period for ‌party members, indicating a desire to de-escalate the current strife.

    Representative Han, for‍ his part, is navigating these complexities carefully. When⁤ questioned about changes in his stance on ​the ‌Special Prosecution Act, he has been noncommittal, asserting that he ⁤did not advocate for a shift ‌in position. He also commented on the situation⁣ by noting the need to prevent political brokers from manipulating public sentiment, implying a push against the activities labeled as ‌”trucking” or manipulation ⁢of opinion.

    Despite calls for restraint from some factions, there appears to be pressure on Han ⁢to address the ⁤party member bulletin board issue directly, with pro-Yoon ‌lawmakers ⁤assertively suggesting that Han’s handling of the situation is key to his leadership standing. The situation seems delicate, with various factions within the party grappling with how to proceed⁣ in light of the accusations and the need‍ for unity.

    the atmosphere is charged, and the future dynamics of the party may hinge on⁣ how Representative Han and the pro-Yoon faction navigate these internal disputes and present a united front moving forward.

You may also like

Leave a Comment