A new blood test to detect Alzheimer’s shows promising results in clinical trial

Nearly one million people in Spain ⁣alone currently suffer‍ from dementia, ⁤and this number is expected to only ⁢increase in the coming decades. In this context, the development of technologies for early diagnosissince early diagnosis of ⁣the disease allows it to be ⁢addressed when the treatment possibilities are better.

This⁢ circumstance has greatly promoted,‌ among other areas, the biomarker research of this pathology: ⁢specific biological ⁢indicators that can be measured, ‌for example, through blood tests. In this direction, a human clinical trial​ presented at the 17th Alzheimer’s Disease Clinical Trials Congress (held in Madrid) recently showed good⁤ results for two Alzheimer’s detection methods based on these biomarkers in the‍ blood.

Two new ​blood tests

As explained in a statement the ⁤pharmaceutical ⁤company Roche, which is the developer of these tools, one of the tests tested in that study is the so-called Elecsys amyloid⁢ plasma panelWhich measures blood⁢ levels⁢ of ‌phosphorylated Tau protein (pTau) 181 ​and apolipoprotein E4 (ApoE4). ⁣The second is ‌called⁣ Test Elecsys pTau⁣ 217, ​ and measures‍ the level of pTau 217.

The first is a minimally invasive system It requires⁢ only a small amount of blood. The two values ​​it measures are closely associated with ⁣the ​pathology ⁤of Alzheimer’s: it has been observed​ that pTau 181 is found at increased ⁣levels in the blood and​ cerebrospinal fluid since the first signs of ​cognitive deterioration in patients ⁤and the⁢ ApoE4 gene is one⁣ of the main factors of genetic risk, which are also associated with some side effects of some treatments.

The test was successful on a cohort of 492 patients from the United States and Europe rule out Alzheimer’s with a‍ true negative rate (negative‍ predictive value or ⁢NPV)‌ of 96.2%.

Closer to a blood test for Alzheimer’s

For its part, the second test⁤ is based on ⁢the observation⁢ that pTau ⁢217 levels out They ‌are usually increased in ⁤the ‍blood of patients ‍in the early stages of ⁢cognitive decline.

This system delivers positive and negative ⁣results with​ a high degree of certainty and ‍an inconclusive ​range of 12% requiring further testing to diagnose the disease.

Until now, most systems biomarkers‌ to detect ⁢Alzheimer’s require invasive procedures, such⁤ as removal of cerebrospinal fluid. For some time, several studies have been reporting on the ⁢potential of certain biomarkers present in the blood, which would make the implementation of ⁤these systems much more feasible‌ for patients in the early stages or even for asymptomatic patients.

Therefore, this test represents a further step forward bringing these technologies closer ​to clinical practicesince these are ‍tests on human beings which guarantee a good degree of ‍precision and effectiveness. In ⁤this way it ​is possible that we will soon significantly improve the early ‍diagnosis of the disease and the ⁣effectiveness of ‌treatments.

References

Roché (2024). Roche presents new data at CTAD, demonstrating its growing momentum in Alzheimer’s disease diagnostics. Consulted online at ⁤on November 4, 2024.

Do ⁣you want ‍to receive the best ‍content to take care of ⁤your health and feel good? Sign up for our new ⁢newsletter for free.

We⁢ are‍ already on WhatsApp! If you want to receive all ⁤the latest news ⁤and the most important news of the day on your mobile, ⁣ Click here and join our channel. It is a⁤ free, convenient and safe system.

clinical #trial
Interview ‌Between Time.news​ Editor and Dementia Research Expert

Time.news Editor (T.): Welcome, Dr.‍ Ruiz, and thank you for⁤ joining us today. It’s ‌a pleasure to have you here to⁢ shed light on the exciting advancements⁤ in Alzheimer’s ⁤detection technologies.

Dr. Ruiz (R.): Thank you ‍for having me! It’s a crucial topic, especially given the rising ⁤number⁤ of dementia cases in Spain and around the world.

T.: Absolutely! Nearly one million people in Spain are​ currently affected by dementia, and it’s ⁢projected to rise. Can you explain why early ​diagnosis is so critical for Alzheimer’s patients?

R.: Early diagnosis ⁢is vital because ⁢it allows for intervention before significant cognitive decline occurs. When diagnosed early, treatment options are more effective, and patients can better ⁣manage their⁤ symptoms. Early detection also gives families time to prepare and make informed decisions regarding care.

T.: That’s a great point. The ⁤article mentions a recent clinical ‌trial at the 17th Alzheimer’s Disease Clinical⁤ Trials Congress in Madrid that showed promising⁤ results for two ‌new blood tests.‍ What can you tell us ⁢about these tests?

R.: ​The two tests developed by Roche focus on specific biomarkers found in the blood—specifically, phosphorylated Tau proteins. The first, the Elecsys amyloid plasma panel, measures​ pTau 181 and apolipoprotein E4 (ApoE4), ⁤while the second ​test, Elecsys pTau 217, measures pTau 217 levels. Both biomarkers are closely tied ⁤to ⁤Alzheimer’s pathology.

T.: So, ⁢how effective are these tests in diagnosing​ Alzheimer’s?

R.: In the clinical trial involving 492 patients from the‌ U.S. and Europe, the ⁤first test demonstrated a remarkable true negative rate of 96.2%. This means it was⁤ highly effective in⁤ ruling out Alzheimer’s when the disease was not present, providing confidence in its diagnostic‌ capabilities.

T.: ‌ That’s impressive! You mentioned that the first test‌ is minimally invasive. How does this compare to traditional methods of testing?

R.: Traditional methods often require invasive procedures, like lumbar punctures to extract cerebrospinal fluid, which ⁤can be uncomfortable and daunting for ‍patients. These new blood tests require only a small⁢ blood sample, making them much more accessible and feasible for early detection—especially for individuals‌ who may not yet show symptoms.

T.: It sounds like these tests could significantly change the landscape for dementia ‍diagnostics.⁢ Are‍ there ⁣any limitations to be aware of?

R.: ⁢Yes, while the tests⁢ provide ⁣high accuracy,‍ the second test does present an inconclusive range of⁢ about 12%, necessitating further testing. This highlights the need for a comprehensive approach ‍combining these blood tests with other diagnostic⁤ methods to ensure⁣ accuracy.

T.: How do you think these advancements will impact the future ​of Alzheimer’s care?

R.: ‍If ⁢these tests continue to be validated, they could revolutionize⁣ the way we approach Alzheimer’s prevention​ and treatment. Early detection would facilitate timely interventions, potentially ⁢improving quality of life and​ outcomes for many⁢ patients.

T.: It ⁢sounds like we are moving toward a more proactive approach in tackling Alzheimer’s disease. What else can we expect in⁣ the near future in terms of research and development?

R.: There’s ongoing research exploring additional biomarkers and improving existing diagnostic tools. The ⁤goal is to create a comprehensive, reliable‌ toolkit ​for healthcare providers that allows them to conduct early screenings on a larger scale, integrating technology, genetics, and patient history.

T.: Thank you,​ Dr. Ruiz,​ for your valuable insights into this critical issue.‍ It’s clear that advancements in technology hold promise for earlier and more ‍accurate diagnoses of Alzheimer’s, potentially transforming care for millions.

R.: Thank you⁢ for the ⁣opportunity to discuss this important topic. It’s essential that we continue raising awareness and supporting research efforts to tackle Alzheimer’s head-on.

T.: We appreciate your time today! ‌Looking forward ⁤to seeing what the future holds ‍for Alzheimer’s research.

You may also like

Leave a Comment