2024-03-08 19:20:17
« Value does not wait for the number of years » (says the proverb), values do.
In Macronie, to be successful, you must above all master the art of lying publicly, of cheating openly and of contempt with cynicism and aplomb – even when caught in the act – democracy, the people, the State of law and the rules which have been adopted to guarantee their respect. Since Olivier Véran, champion in all categories, and Elisabeth Borne too (Borne to be a liar and Borne has lies in her skin), it is Emmanuel 1st who has taken back first place in false truths and real lies, not succumbing to the temptation to submit his government to the Challenge of the Truth. These are the values that must be unwavering to the members of the team, especially the leaders, in all circumstances. The credibility of the entire building is at stake.
Indeed, the inversion of values in all matters and at all levels is the essential foundation of “ Because it’s our project » reduction of France to nothing with an abysmal debt of more than 3,100 billion euros in what amounts to a complete destruction of France, the Nation and its history, a terminal cancer that President Macron is trying to achieve this by engaging France in a military conflict against Russia, for whose advent he has been struggling like a lonely man for a month on the international scene, and fortunately for him only ridicule don’t kill.
As a result, lying, cheating, contempt, brazenly transgressing the rules, are indeed the values that the members of Macronie must defend tooth and nail, every day and at every moment, to be able to carry out this disastrous project.
And this is particularly the case after each of the “guide’s” public interventions; the “Führer”, said activists in Germany not long ago, who had more or less the same project, in terms of its finality: to put the Europe of the people to death. Omitting the diplomatic values of France, the courage of Peace and the Art of Compromise.
However, when it comes to knowing how to show oneself worthy of Macronian values “ whatever it costs », is not what Richard Ferrand wants. Take for example Jean-Marc Zulesi.
He was born on June 6, 1988, and is therefore barely 36 years old. “Renaissance” MP re-elected in 2022, he is President of the National Assembly, of the committee on sustainable development and regional planningsince June 30, 2022.
Well, guess what? Won !
Recently, President Zulesi was caught lying and attempting to cheat, in the middle of a committee meeting. The big commission in this case, because although he received help from his chief of staff, he did not manage to get out of the big mess in which he found himself on this occasion. A public diarrhea, what’s more, the scene having been filmed.
The macronie is trying to rig a vote. The images are incredible. pic.twitter.com/v6yLeT0zin
— Duval Philippe (@p_duval) March 6, 2024
But there. I insist: it is not Richard Ferrand who wants.
When such a mishap happened to Richard Ferrand, in 2021, while he was at the time, directly President of the National Assembly, here is what this old political rogue that he is did, and this despite the fact that it was live on television, and not just recorded on social networks.
The nature of the theft was the same: openly ignoring the result of a show of hands on the adoption of an amendment.
Whereas, when he asked “ Who is for it? “, the deputies present who raised their hands were very few in number, and that conversely, there were very many who did so when he asked ” Who is against? », Richard Ferrand said this without trembling his chin: “ Amendment adopted! »
As a result, an outcry from opposition MPs ensued. What does it matter! Richard Ferrand remained impassive.
Totally deaf to their vehement yet legitimate protests, it is with a back of the hand synonymous with an arm of honor given to probity, and a suppository application of the internal regulations of the National Assembly, that he will dismiss their insistent and just as perfectly legitimate request that a new vote be carried out, or, at a minimum, a verification of the result of the vote, thanks to surveillance cameras, these covering the entire hemicycle.
Niet! Next case! And those who are not happy, let them go and get vaccinated.
It must also be said that unlike Jean-Marc Zelusi, elected deputy in 2017 only because at the time, the momentum in favor of Emmanuel Macron, newly elected President of the Republic was such that even a goat, Sibeth Ndiaye or an inflatable doll would have won the bet, as long as it had benefited from the label “ The Republic on the Move », Richard Ferrand has the bottle.
Born on July 1, 1962, Richard Ferrand was 60 years old at the time of the events. And above all, before being appointed President of the National Assembly by Emmanuel Macron, in 2018, replacing François de Rugy then entangled in a story of incidental expenses (1), Richard Ferrand had a long career policy.
Member of the Socialist Party from 1980 to 2016, first elected general councilor of Finistère in 1998, he returned to Brittany in 2010. Then, elected deputy in 2012, he was official rapporteur of the Macron 1 law and the Macron law 2, an Emmanuel of whom he will become the general secretary of the movement he created in 2016, “En Marche. » And, finally, appointed he was, in May 2017, Minister of Territorial Cohesion in the first Government of Édouard Philippe, he had to leave this post in June 2017 (a short month later), indicted and he found a legal proceeding in which he denied everything despite the overwhelming evidence against him.
Facts qualified as “a feat of arms” attesting to respect for the above-mentioned Macronian values, jurisprudence since validated by many of his colleagues, elected MP with flying colors that he was in 2017, his peers elected him President of the Assembly national in 2018.
This is why Richard Ferrand dared to do what Jean-Marc Zulesi resigned himself not to do.
This is not essentially a question of courage, but of experience: an excess of experience for one, a very great lack of experience for the other. In truth, Richard Ferrand is no more courageous than honest and honest, as cowardly Jean-Marc Zulesi seemed to be (or at least playing it safe), when he finally decided to put away tambourines and trumpets, and go out the pan flute.
If Richard Ferrand allowed himself to push the envelope so far in contempt, illegality and vice, it is because he was convinced that he could get away with anything. That he was risking nothing. Wrongly. For once, the voters had a memory: during the legislative elections that followed, “Mr. President” was eliminated in the first round.
And since then, tell me if I’m wrong, we’ve never heard from him again.
No doubt fearing to end up in the oblivion of politics, Jean-Marc Zulesi preferred to limit the free rein he leaves to the despotic impulses he has in the exercise of his functions, to the limits of what is admitted by the electorate.
The future will tell us if “the French men and women” felt that, on the contrary, this false freedman crossed them.
According to Robert de Niro, Joe Pessi and Ray Liotta, it’s not cinema: it’s entirely possible.
(1) a story of lobsters and caviar that he still hasn’t digested, allergic to the poor thing, he swears, and of champagne as well, a drink that he claims to hate. And there, we want to believe it: the headache that it gave him, in fact, politically, he never really recovered from it.
#Richard #Ferrand #bis.. #lowend #JeanMarc #Zulesi