Kochi: The High Court has questioned the stand taken by the prosecution in the case of attacking the actress. The court said it suspected the new move was to produce testimonies in favor of the case, adding that there was sufficient reason to re-examine the witnesses.
The prosecution’s omissions in the trial should not be overstated. Defendants’ rights must also be protected. The court noted that the new demand was raised months after examining witnesses here. The court asked whether the prosecution would move to extend the trial.
What is the connection between Balachandra Kumar’s revelations and the case? The court also asked the prosecution how his revelations could help the case. Meanwhile, Dileep’s lawyer’s lawyer alleged that Baiju Paulus, the investigating officer, was behind the controversy surrounding the case.
The prosecution approached the high court with a complaint that the trial court did not accept the prosecution’s demand that some witnesses be re-examined. The court did not record the main arguments of the case.
The Ernakulam CJM court had yesterday given permission to record the secret statement of director Balachandra Kumar, who came up with a new revelation in the case. The prosecution is approaching the court with a retrial as the trial in the case against the actress is due to be completed next month. The government has told the Supreme Court that further investigation into the case is needed and that more time is needed for the hearing.
English Summary : High Court questions prosecution’s stand in actress attack case
.