Admiral David Johnston has spent nearly 50 years in uniform, a career defined by the necessity of delivering challenging messages without evasion. From fronting the media during the fallout of unintended civilian casualties in Iraq in 2017 to managing joint operations against Islamic State, the Australian Defence Force chief is well-versed in the high stakes of military transparency.
This week, at the Russell complex in Canberra, Johnston provided a masterclass in clarity that stood in stark contrast to the political maneuvering of the federal government. As the nation navigates the volatile dynamics of the Trump era, the need for a Prime Minister to speak more clearly and more often has become a strategic necessity, yet Anthony Albanese and the Labor government continue to rely on a cautious, often opaque, communication style.
The tension centers on Australia’s role in a disruptive and unpopular war waged by US President Donald Trump. While Trump has used social media to lash out at allies—including Australia—for a perceived lack of assistance, the Australian government has largely responded with what can only be described as “weasel words,” avoiding definitive stances on the country’s strategic commitments in the Middle East.
The core of the friction involves the strategic strait of Hormuz. Amidst a barrage of insults from the White House, questions have dogged the government regarding whether Australia would contribute to an international mission to reopen the strait. While Labor has insisted that the White House has requested nothing beyond a limited defensive deployment of E-7 Wedgetail aircraft to the United Arab Emirates, the lack of a broader strategic explanation has left a void in the public discourse.
The Strategic Calculus of the Indo-Pacific
Admiral Johnston filled that void by explaining the difficult calculations happening behind the scenes. He did not rely on political jargon. instead, he highlighted the tension between supporting a key ally in the Gulf and maintaining a critical presence in the Indo-Pacific. Johnston noted that as the US relocates significant military firepower away from the region to support the war in Iran, China is watching closely.
Without qualification, Johnston stated he was “very confident” that Australia possesses the capability to deploy a ship for the Hormuz effort if the government decided to do so. However, he pivoted to the more vital question of strategic interest, noting that maintaining a regional environment in the Indo-Pacific is currently the priority.
“The United States has moved enormous military capacity into the Gulf region at the moment, including a lot of capacity out of the Indo-Pacific,” Johnston said. “This is an important time for us to be present in the Indo-Pacific to maintain that regional environment that we seek to maintain.”
Intelligence and the Wedgetail Deployment
The Admiral also provided the nuance missing from the Prime Minister’s briefings regarding the E-7 Wedgetail surveillance plane and the 85 defence personnel tasked with its operation. While the government’s communication has been sparse—with Prime Minister Albanese simply stating that the aircraft “will be staying in the region for a period of time”—Johnston detailed the actual mission parameters.
The Wedgetail is collecting intelligence on drones and airborne threats to Gulf countries. Crucially, Johnston explained that crews are filtering the information they share with partners, including the US and Israel, to ensure Australia does not inadvertently contribute to offensive operations. This distinction—defensive intelligence gathering versus offensive support—is a critical nuance that the government has failed to communicate effectively to the public.
The effectiveness of this clarity was evident when Defence Minister Richard Marles later cited Johnston’s logic during a Radio National Breakfast appearance to explain the “laser-like focus” Labor maintains on the strategic landscape as China increases its influence in the Indo-Pacific.
A Pattern of Political Caution
The government’s reluctance to speak plainly extends beyond foreign policy. This week, the Prime Minister missed another opportunity for clear leadership when questioned about the arrest of Victoria Cross recipient Ben Roberts-Smith on war crimes charges. In a press conference following the SAS veteran’s arrest at Sydney Airport, Albanese declined to comment, citing the upcoming court proceedings. His media team’s transcripts went as far as to refer to the case only as a “former ADF member charged.”
This cautious approach contrasted sharply with Australian Federal Police Commissioner Krissy Barrett, who explicitly stressed the presumption of innocence for Roberts-Smith and used the moment to rally support for the broader military community and the families of fallen service members. It was only by the end of the week that Albanese followed suit, referencing the symbolic line of sight from the Australian War Memorial to his own desk at Parliament House.
The Transparency Gap in Defence
This culture of caution is mirrored in the broader bureaucracy of Canberra’s defence sector. The government recently attempted to end an annual report on delays and cost blowouts in major defence projects, a document produced by the auditor-general since 2008. That report has historically exposed roughly Auditor-General findings of $80 billion in projects running a combined 30 years behind schedule. While the Senate is expected to overturn this move toward opacity, it underscores a systemic resistance to straightforward disclosure.
| Issue | Government Position | ADF Strategic Context |
|---|---|---|
| Hormuz Strait | Limited defensive deployment | Capability exists, but Indo-Pacific priority outweighs Gulf interest |
| Wedgetail Role | Staying “for a period of time” | Defensive intel gathering; filtering out offensive data |
| US-Australia Relations | Avoiding “buy-in” or “biting back” | Managing Trump’s demands while countering Chinese regional influence |
As Australia continues to navigate the unpredictable nature of the Trump administration’s foreign policy, the contrast between military professionalism and political caution is stark. Admiral Johnston’s ability to provide a clear, nuanced, and honest assessment of the country’s strategic position provides a blueprint for how the executive branch should operate.
The next major checkpoint for the government’s strategic direction will be the imminent release of the new national defence strategy. This document will provide the official framework for how Australia intends to balance its alliance with the US against the growing pressures of the Indo-Pacific region.
We want to hear your thoughts on the balance between strategic secrecy and public transparency. Share this article and join the conversation in the comments below.
Related reading
