Apple is reportedly exploring a strategic shift in its hardware supply chain, initiating small-scale tests with Intel to manufacture certain iPhone, iPad, and Mac chips. The move suggests a cautious effort by the tech giant to diversify its semiconductor production and reduce its near-total reliance on Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (TSMC).
According to reports from industry analyst Ming-Chi Kuo, Apple has begun testing lower-end and legacy Apple silicon using Intel’s 18A P process. While the testing is currently limited in scope, it represents a significant pivot in how Apple manages the geopolitical and operational risks associated with its chip fabrication.
The shift is less about replacing its primary partner and more about creating a “safety valve.” For years, Apple has been the anchor client for TSMC, but the concentration of high-end chip production in Taiwan has long been viewed as a systemic vulnerability by analysts and policymakers alike. By integrating Intel—and specifically targeting production within the United States—Apple could insulate itself from regional instability and supply shocks.
The Role of Intel’s 18A Process
The technical core of this reported partnership centers on Intel’s 18A process, a leading-edge node that Intel is positioning as a cornerstone of its foundry ambitions. This process is being benchmarked against the TSMC nodes used for Apple’s high-performance chips, such as the A18 Pro.
However, Apple is not yet handing over the keys to its most powerful processors. The current testing is focused on “legacy” and lower-end chips—the components that power more affordable iPhone models or basic iPad configurations. Kuo estimates that approximately 80% of the chips in this reported Intel order mix are intended for iPhone models.
Apple is reportedly moving ahead with efforts to diversify its chip production beyond TSMC, with Intel emerging as a possible manufacturing partner. Apple analyst Ming Chi Kuo reported that Apple and Intel have started small-scale testing of lower-end and legacy Apple silicon chips using Intel’s 18A P process, according to multiple reports.
By utilizing Intel’s US-based facilities, Apple would be aligning its supply chain with the broader trend of “onshoring” critical technology, potentially benefiting from the incentives provided by the CHIPS and Science Act, which aims to boost domestic semiconductor manufacturing.
A Gradual Transition Timeline
Industry insiders suggest that this is a long-term play rather than an immediate overhaul. The transition is expected to move in phases, allowing Apple to verify Intel’s yields and quality control before committing to larger volumes.
The current phase involves small-scale testing throughout the current year. If these tests meet Apple’s stringent power-efficiency and performance standards, production is expected to ramp up significantly between 2027, and 2028. Interestingly, reports suggest that capacity may begin to decline again by 2029, suggesting that Apple may view this as a transitional phase or a specific capacity bridge as Intel matures its more advanced process nodes.
To understand the scale of this shift, it is helpful to look at the projected distribution of Apple’s chip sourcing:
| Supplier | Estimated Volume Share | Primary Focus |
|---|---|---|
| TSMC | ~90% | High-end (A-series Pro, M-series) |
| Intel | ~10% (Projected) | Lower-end/Legacy Silicon |
TSMC’s Continued Dominance
Despite the foray into Intel’s foundries, TSMC remains the undisputed heavyweight in Apple’s ecosystem. The Taiwan-based firm is expected to continue supplying roughly 90% of all Apple silicon. The technical gap between TSMC’s most advanced nodes and the rest of the industry remains wide, particularly regarding the energy efficiency that allows iPhones to maintain long battery life while delivering high performance.
For Apple, the goal is not to find a TSMC equal—which may not currently exist at scale—but to find a viable secondary source. In the world of global logistics, “single-source” is a word that keeps COOs awake at night. By splitting production, Apple gains leverage in price negotiations and ensures that a single natural disaster or political event in the Taiwan Strait cannot freeze its entire product pipeline.
What So for the Consumer
For the average user, this shift will likely be invisible. Whether a chip is fabricated in Hsinchu or Arizona, the design remains Apple’s. The primary impact will be felt in the corporate balance sheets and the resilience of the supply chain. If Intel can successfully execute the 18A ramp, it could lead to more stable pricing for entry-level devices and a more secure rollout of new hardware during global crises.
The move also serves as a massive validation for Intel’s “IDM 2.0” strategy. For years, Intel has struggled to transition from making only its own chips to acting as a foundry for others. Securing a client like Apple, even for legacy chips, provides Intel with the prestige and the rigorous feedback loop necessary to compete with TSMC and Samsung.
The next critical checkpoint for this partnership will be the results of the 18A P process testing. If Apple moves from small-scale tests to a formal production contract for 2027 models, it will mark one of the most significant shifts in the semiconductor landscape of the decade.
Disclaimer: This article discusses corporate strategy and semiconductor market trends. It is intended for informational purposes and does not constitute financial or investment advice.
Do you think diversifying chip production will make iPhones more affordable or more resilient? Share your thoughts in the comments below.
