For years, the narrative around autism has been largely shaped by male experiences. But a growing number of women are now receiving autism diagnoses in adulthood, often after recognizing themselves in stories shared on social media platforms like TikTok. This surge in self-discovery is prompting a critical conversation: is this a wave of accurate self-identification, or a misdiagnosis fueled by online trends? As a physician and therapist, I’ve witnessed this shift firsthand and it’s a complex phenomenon rooted in a long history of diagnostic bias and a recent expansion of our understanding of how autism presents in women.
The story of “Sara,” a patient I met four years ago, is representative of this trend. She discovered the possibility of autism through social media content, leading her to seek both therapy and formal testing, ultimately receiving a diagnosis. Sara wasn’t alone. Increasingly, I’ve seen women arrive in my practice having come to similar conclusions – spurred by social media, the diagnosis of their children, experiences of autistic burnout, or simply by researching the nuances of the female autism phenotype. This isn’t about a “TikTok diagnosis” in the dismissive sense; it’s about women finally finding a framework to understand lifelong feelings of being different.
A History of Missed Diagnoses
The reasons for this late recognition are deeply embedded in the history of autism research. Early studies, notably those led by Leo Kanner in the United States beginning in the late 1930s, focused almost exclusively on white boys. Kanner’s 1943 publication, considered foundational to the field, didn’t include any girls in its initial sample. Meanwhile, Hans Asperger’s perform in Germany, although including girls, ultimately prioritized boys, believing their unique minds could benefit the Nazi regime – a tragically skewed rationale that did not extend to girls, who faced persecution.
This male-centric focus continued for decades, influencing the development of diagnostic tools. These tools were normed and validated based on traits commonly observed in boys, leading to a significant underdiagnosis of girls and women. The current diagnostic ratio of 3-4 boys for every 1 girl identified is a stark illustration of this historical bias. However, when intellectual disabilities are present, the ratio approaches 1:1, raising the question: is autism genuinely less prevalent in females, or are we simply failing to recognize its presentation in them?
Emerging Research and a Shifting Landscape
Recent research suggests the latter is far more likely. A 2026 study in Sweden, following 2.7 million individuals born between 1985 and 2020, found that the gender gap in autism diagnoses largely disappeared by early adulthood. Spectrum News reports on this study, highlighting that the psychological community may be missing diagnoses in as many as 75% of autistic girls. This is a significant finding, suggesting that the issue isn’t a sudden increase in autism prevalence, but rather an increased awareness and improved identification of autistic traits in women.
For many women receiving diagnoses later in life, the experience is profoundly validating. After years of feeling “different” or “broken,” a diagnosis provides a sense of relief and understanding. However, it often comes with grief – grief for a life lived without this knowledge, and frustration over past misdiagnoses and ineffective treatments. I’ve seen clients told they weren’t “trying hard enough” when conventional therapies failed, unaware that those therapies weren’t designed for neurodivergent brains.
The Pushback and Why It’s Familiar
Despite this growing understanding, there’s been a recent backlash against the increasing number of women being diagnosed with autism. This manifests as skepticism online, and, more concerningly, as dismissive attitudes from some healthcare professionals. Some providers are telling clients with neuropsychological testing reports confirming an autism diagnosis that they “can’t be autistic.” This resistance echoes a troubling pattern in the history of mental health, where women’s experiences have been routinely dismissed or pathologized.
Influential autism researcher Uta Frith recently expressed skepticism about the concept of autism as a spectrum, suggesting that many women receiving diagnoses are simply “hypersensitive.” This perspective, while coming from a respected figure in the field, feels deeply familiar. Throughout history, women have been labeled with diagnoses like “hysteria” or “wandering wombs,” subjected to unnecessary medical interventions like lobotomies, tranquilizers, and even forced sterilization. The current pushback against recognizing autism in women feels like a continuation of this pattern of medical gatekeeping and dismissal of female experiences.
Checking Our Biases
Is it an exaggeration to draw parallels between this skepticism and past injustices? Perhaps. But having witnessed the emotional toll on clients who have had their diagnoses invalidated, it doesn’t sense like one. As professionals, we have a responsibility to critically examine our own biases and stay current with the latest research. I, too, must continually check my own assumptions and ensure I’m considering all possibilities. The imperative is clear: we must prioritize “doing no harm” and ensure that all individuals, regardless of gender, receive accurate and affirming diagnoses.
The increasing self-identification of autistic women, often facilitated by online communities, isn’t necessarily a sign of misdiagnosis. It’s a sign of increased awareness, a dismantling of long-held biases, and a growing recognition that autism presents differently in women than in men. The next step is continued research, improved diagnostic tools, and a commitment from healthcare professionals to listen to and validate the experiences of all patients.
If you or someone you know is exploring a possible autism diagnosis, resources are available. The Autism Society of America (https://www.autism-society.org/) provides information, support, and advocacy. Please share this article with anyone who might find it helpful, and join the conversation in the comments below.
Disclaimer: This article provides information for general knowledge and informational purposes only, and does not constitute medical advice. It is essential to consult with a qualified healthcare professional for any health concerns or before making any decisions related to your health or treatment.
Related reading
