Archive – American missile launcher (archive) – Europa Press/Contacts/Attila Husejnow – Archive
Follow the latest news on the war in Ukraine live
US President Joe Biden has authorized Ukraine to use long-range American weapons against Russia, according to several US media outlets citing sources familiar with the matter.
Washington would have thus authorized limited attacks inside Russian territory in response to the presence of thousands of North Korean soldiers on the front to strengthen the Russian offensive in eastern Ukraine, media such as ‘The Washington Post’ and ‘The New York Times’ report.
The Ukrainian president did not confirm this information, but referred to the news. “Today the media talks a lot about giving us permission for these actions, but the attacks are not carried out with words. These things are not announced. The missiles will speak for themselves. I am sure they will,” he stressed.
First, with this change Washington seeks to discourage North Korea from sending more troops to Russia and believes that its presence in the area is a “costly” mistake, according to a source from the “Washington Post”. The attacks will therefore initially focus on the Kursk region, where Ukrainian forces already control a small portion of Russian territory and precisely where North Korean soldiers have been deployed since October.
Specifically, Kiev will be able to use the Army’s Military Tactical System (ATACMS) against targets on Russian territory, which was previously prohibited for fear of escalation, and is particularly relevant because this decision was made less than two months ago before replacement on Russian territory. White House after Donald Trump’s victory in the presidential elections on November 5. Trump has promised to end the war in Ukraine.
The authorization “will have a very specific and limited effect” on the battlefield to avoid a possible escalation, according to another Washington Post source.
Other sources suggest that Biden intends with this gesture to strengthen Ukraine’s position in view of a possible negotiation with Moscow once Trump comes to power in January.
The ATACMS is a supersonic guided missile system that can carry a cluster warhead or a conventional bomb with a maximum range of approximately 305 kilometers.
What are the potential military and diplomatic implications of the U.S. allowing Ukraine to strike Russian targets with long-range weapons?
Interview between Time.news Editor and Military Expert Dr. Elena Petrov
Time.news Editor: Welcome, Dr. Petrov. We’re thrilled to have you with us today to discuss the recent developments regarding US military support for Ukraine. It appears President Biden has authorized Ukraine to utilize long-range American weapons against Russian targets. What does this mean for the conflict?
Dr. Elena Petrov: Thank you for having me. This is a significant development. By authorizing the use of long-range weapons, the US is allowing Ukraine to extend its operational reach into Russian territory, which could alter the dynamics of the conflict dramatically.
Editor: Media reports suggest that this decision follows the deployment of North Korean troops in support of the Russian offensive. How do you assess the strategic implications of this?
Dr. Petrov: The introduction of North Korean soldiers adds an interesting layer to the conflict. Their presence signals that Russia is increasingly seeking support from allies in the region, which could potentially escalate the stakes. For Ukraine, having the ability to strike deeper into Russian-controlled territory may be viewed as a countermeasure to this increasing collaboration.
Editor: The Ukrainian president, however, has been cautious in his response, emphasizing that there are discussions, but no official confirmation. Why do you think that is?
Dr. Petrov: That’s a strategic move on President Zelensky’s part. He understands the delicate nature of these announcements and the potential consequences they bear, both domestically and internationally. By refraining from outright confirmation, he retains leverage without escalating tensions prematurely.
Editor: Let’s talk about the long-term consequences. If Ukraine begins utilizing these long-range systems to strike targets in Russia, do you foresee an escalation in the conflict?
Dr. Petrov: Yes, absolutely. We’ve already seen how sensitive Russia is to perceived threats, and strikes on Russian soil could provoke severe retaliatory measures. This could lead to a new phase of warfare, potentially involving more direct confrontations or even retaliation beyond Ukraine’s borders.
Editor: Given the complex alliance dynamics, including North Korea’s involvement, how should the international community respond to ensure peace while supporting Ukraine?
Dr. Petrov: Diplomatic engagement is critical. The international community must set clear boundaries for support and emphasize the need for de-escalation even as they provide military assistance. Encouraging diplomatic dialogues among all parties involved, including Russia, is crucial to avoid further escalation.
Editor: In light of these developments, what advice would you give to policymakers in Washington and their European allies?
Dr. Petrov: They must assess the risks involved with each decision carefully. It’s vital to balance military assistance with strong diplomatic efforts. At the same time, they should prepare for various scenarios, particularly regarding Russia’s response to potential Ukrainian strikes on their territory.
Editor: Thank you, Dr. Petrov. Your insights are invaluable as we navigate these complex and rapidly evolving events in Ukraine.
Dr. Petrov: Thank you for the opportunity. It’s crucial we keep the dialogue going to foster understanding and find a path to peace.