The digital back-and-forth between CNN’s Jake Tapper and former Fox News host Bill O’Reilly this week offered a stark reminder of the circumstances surrounding O’Reilly’s departure from cable news, and his continued attempts to re-establish a foothold in the media landscape. The exchange, sparked by O’Reilly’s criticism of Tapper’s ratings, quickly escalated into a pointed rebuke of O’Reilly’s past conduct.
O’Reilly initiated the exchange on Wednesday, tweeting that Sean Hannity was “kicking serious butt in the ratings” and that Tapper’s viewership on CNN was “as low as you can go.” The comment, whereas seemingly focused on television metrics, opened the door for Tapper to respond with a blistering counterpoint, directly addressing the reasons for O’Reilly’s own removal from Fox News.
Tapper’s reply, delivered via Twitter, didn’t shy away from the allegations that led to O’Reilly’s ouster. He wrote, “‘Low’ would be sexually harassing staffers and then getting fired for it — humiliated in front of the world. Now THAT would be low.” The tweet, which quickly circulated online, brought renewed attention to the multiple accusations of sexual harassment leveled against O’Reilly during his tenure at Fox News.
The core of the matter stems from a series of reports in April 2017 detailing allegations of sexual harassment and misconduct against O’Reilly. The New York Times reported at the time that both Fox News and O’Reilly had paid settlements totaling $13 million to five women who had accused him of inappropriate behavior, in exchange for non-disclosure agreements.
These settlements, and subsequent reporting, led to a significant backlash against O’Reilly and ultimately resulted in his removal from Fox News. While O’Reilly maintained his innocence and characterized the allegations as politically motivated, the network determined it could no longer sustain the controversy.
A Continued Pursuit of Relevance
Despite the damaging allegations and his departure from Fox News, O’Reilly has remained active in the media, consistently seeking new platforms to reach an audience. He launched “No Spin News,” a subscription-based web show, and continues to host a radio program. He’s also published a newsletter and made numerous guest appearances on other networks, including a regular spot on Glenn Beck’s radio show. Reports from late 2017 indicated O’Reilly was actively planning a media comeback.
His latest venture includes a new book, which, according to The Washington Post, recently topped The New York Times bestseller list. O’Reilly has publicly framed his efforts as a response to a “political and financial hit job,” alleging a concerted effort to damage his reputation.
Adding another layer to the situation, O’Reilly has received public support from former President Donald Trump, who has retweeted O’Reilly’s posts, including some made during the height of the Harvey Weinstein scandal. Trump himself has faced numerous allegations of sexual misconduct, which he has denied.
Sean Hannity kicking serious butt in the ratings. Tapper on CNN as low as you can go.
— Bill O’Reilly (@billoreilly) October 18, 2017
“Low” would be sexually harassing staffers and then getting fired for it — humiliated in front of the world. Now THAT would be low. https://t.co/e2d6kOHL7F
— Jake Tapper (@jaketapper) October 18, 2017
The Ratings Context and Tapper’s Response
The initial exchange between O’Reilly and Tapper was predicated on a comparison of television ratings. However, it’s important to note the differing airtimes of their respective programs. Tapper’s “The Lead” airs at 4 p.m. Eastern, while Hannity’s show airs at 9 p.m. Eastern. This difference in scheduling makes a direct ratings comparison less meaningful, as viewership patterns vary significantly throughout the day.
Tapper’s response, while pointed, was widely seen as a defense of journalistic integrity and a condemnation of O’Reilly’s past behavior. It underscored the gravity of the allegations against O’Reilly and the consequences he faced as a result. The swiftness and directness of Tapper’s reply resonated with many observers, who viewed it as a necessary rebuke of O’Reilly’s attempts to downplay or dismiss the accusations.
The Broader Implications
The incident highlights the ongoing conversation surrounding accountability for misconduct in the media industry. The #MeToo movement, which gained momentum in 2017, brought increased scrutiny to allegations of sexual harassment and abuse, leading to the downfall of numerous high-profile figures, including O’Reilly. The case also raises questions about the role of media personalities in shaping public discourse and the responsibility they have to uphold ethical standards.
O’Reilly’s continued efforts to remain relevant in the media landscape, despite the serious allegations against him, demonstrate a resilience and a willingness to challenge prevailing norms. His success in achieving bestseller status with his new book suggests a continued base of support among certain segments of the population. However, the sharp response from figures like Tapper indicates that his past conduct will continue to be a point of contention.
As O’Reilly continues to pursue various media ventures, it remains to be seen whether he will be able to fully rehabilitate his public image. The next significant development will likely be the continued performance of his book and the extent to which he is able to secure further high-profile media appearances.
We encourage readers to share their thoughts on this story and engage in respectful dialogue in the comments section below.
