Bill Wyman Says Rolling Stones Should Have Ended With Charlie Watts’ Death

by time news

Bill Wyman, the former bassist for The rolling Stones, recently shared his⁣ thoughts on the passing​ of his⁢ bandmate Charlie Watts, suggesting that Watts’ death in 2021 could have⁤ been a natural‍ conclusion for the legendary group.

Wyman, who joined ​the band in 1962 and remained‍ for over 30 years, explained that⁢ while Mick Jagger and Watts had attempted to persuade him to stay when he left in 1993, his desire to pursue other interests outweighed the appeal of ​continuing with the⁤ band.

Though Wyman ‌viewed himself as replaceable within the band’s dynamics, he believed Watts’ unique presence was irreplaceable. ⁤ "When Charlie left, I thought they would call ⁤it quits," Wyman admitted in a recent interview with Classic Rock magazine. "They ‌could⁣ find another bassist, but I didn’t think they could replace Charlie. He had⁢ such charisma, and was truly‌ a​ special guy. I was surprised they continued, to be honest.‌ Not disappointed, just surprised."

Wyman himself enjoys a fulfilling life filled with diverse projects, but he doesn’t see the same creative outlets driving his ​former bandmates. "Mick’s dabbled in movies ⁤and solo ⁢work, but neither really took off as they hoped," he observed. ‍ "Ronnie has his art, but the Stones seem to be their primary focus."

It’s worth noting that prior to Watts’ passing,⁤ the‍ Rolling ‍Stones had released their last album of original material in 2005, with a covers album following ⁤in 2016. Their⁤ new album, Hackney Diamonds, arrived in 2023, featuring Watts’ drumming on two tracks,⁢ "Mess It Up" and⁢ "Live by the Sword". Interestingly, wyman also contributed bass to "Live by the Sword", marking his first studio recording with the band as 1989. While he has performed live with them sporadically over the years, this⁢ marked a special reunion in the ‍studio.

How does ‌Bill⁢ Wyman view the future of the Rolling Stones after Charlie ‍Watts’ passing?

Interview‌ with Bill Wyman: Reflections on Charlie Watts⁤ and ⁣the Rolling​ Stones’ Legacy

Time.news Editor: Bill, thank you for joining us today. Let’s start with your thoughts on Charlie​ Watts’ passing. You suggested it‍ was perhaps a natural conclusion for the Rolling Stones.Could⁣ you elaborate on that?

Bill Wyman: Of course. Charlie⁣ was more than just the drummer for the ⁤Rolling‌ Stones; he was the heartbeat of the ‌band.⁣ When​ he passed away in 2021, I felt that a⁣ chapter was closed. The band has had ‍its ​run, and while we⁣ all grapple with loss differently, Charlie’s⁢ unique presence was irreplaceable. I honestly thought ‌that when he left, they⁢ might consider calling ‍it quits.

Time.news Editor: that’s a poignant insight. You mentioned in a ‌recent interview with ⁣ Classic Rock that while other members might be replaceable, Charlie was not. Why do ‍you think that is?

Bill Wyman: Charlie had an ‍unparalleled charisma⁢ that ⁣contributed significantly to the band’s identity. Sure,they could​ find another bassist,but charlie’s essence,his spirit—it was special. The dynamics⁣ he brought to the group were unique to ​him. His ⁢loss was‍ felt⁤ deeply, and I was surprised they continued⁣ after he passed.​ It makes you reflect on the band’s legacy⁤ and what they truly embody.

Time.news Editor: Speaking ⁢of legacy, the Rolling Stones haven’t released a new album of original ⁣material since 2005 until Hackney Diamonds in 2023,⁣ which features two ​tracks with Charlie’s drumming.​ How do you think this⁣ album fits into the band’s history?

Bill Wyman: Hackney Diamonds ‌represents ⁢a ​meaningful moment for the band. ​The inclusion of Charlie’s ‌drumming on tracks⁤ like‍ “Mess ‌It Up” and “Live ⁢by the Sword” ‌gives it ⁤an‍ authentic Stones feel,a nod to their⁢ roots. It’s almost like‍ a bridge between ​the past and the present, showcasing that even ⁢after loss, there’s room for creative⁢ expression. Plus, my contribution of bass‌ on​ “Live by the Sword,” my first recording with ​them in decades,‌ added an extra ‌layer of nostalgia—I think it resonated with fans and the band alike.

Time.news Editor: you’ve had a fulfilling career post-Rolling Stones, immersing yourself in various projects. How do you‍ perceive the creative⁣ journeys of‍ Mick⁢ and ronnie compared to⁢ your own?

Bill Wyman: It’s interesting, really. While mick ‌has dabbled in solo projects and films, those avenues haven’t taken hold as he might have wished. Ronnie delves into ⁢his art,but the Stones seem to remain central to his world. For me, I pursued diverse interests to keep my creativity flowing. I see⁢ the value in exploring different‌ outlets, which can ​be invigorating ⁣and fulfilling.

Time.news Editor: That’s valuable‍ advice for aspiring musicians and‍ creatives. ⁢How can individuals find their own unique paths while still ⁣honoring their roots,much like you have?

Bill Wyman: I believe it’s important to pay homage to your ‌roots,but don’t be afraid ⁢to branch out. ⁤Mixing old skills with new ‌interests can lead to incredible discoveries. Engage⁣ in ⁢various forms of expression—be it ‍music, art,⁣ writing—find⁣ what inspires you. Embrace change and don’t let your past dictate⁤ your future.

Time.news Editor: Wise words. As we​ conclude, what do you hope the future holds for the ‌Rolling Stones, especially in‍ the post-Charlie ⁣era?

Bill Wyman: The Stones have an incredible legacy, but it’s crucial they evolve while honoring⁢ their past. I hope they⁣ continue to find ​inspiration and bring joy to fans around the world. If they’ve ⁢learned anything from Charlie, it’s the importance of authenticity ⁢in their music. Whatever they do next‌ will ‌carry the weight of their history, and that’s something truly special.

Time.news Editor: thank you, Bill. Your insights on the Rolling Stones, Charlie Watts, and creative⁣ expression ⁢are invaluable, and we appreciate your time⁤ today.

Bill Wyman: ‍Thank you for having me! It’s been‍ a pleasure.

You may also like

Leave a Comment