Slovak MP Calls Out Government’s Universal Energy Aid as “Buying Voters”
A broad-based energy assistance program in Slovakia is facing criticism after opposition MP Janka Bittó Cigániková publicly highlighted its flaws, pointing out that even well-compensated members of parliament are set to receive benefits. The program, intended to alleviate energy costs for citizens, is being labeled as inefficient and potentially a cynical attempt to secure votes.
Bratislava – State assistance with energy prices, while welcomed by many, has sparked controversy due to its widespread eligibility. According to officials, approximately 90 percent of Slovak households are entitled to the aid, a figure that raises questions about the program’s effectiveness in targeting those most in need. This comes as the government simultaneously implements consolidation measures, asking citizens to contribute to “the financial part” of national recovery.
On December 8, Cigániková discovered she would receive the energy voucher, prompting a sharply worded response on social media. “Mr. Fico, Mrs. Sakova… thank you for this Christmas present,” she posted, sarcastically extending her gratitude to Prime Minister Robert Fico and Economy Minister Denisa Saková. She further noted that numerous other parliamentarians would also benefit, adding, “I also thank the pensioners, the working, the unemployed, or single mothers, for coming to help us in the parliament.”
The SaS MP then shifted to a more serious tone, questioning the logic of providing energy assistance to those who can easily afford to cover increased costs. “Should Slovak MPs, who earn really above their means, really receive energy aid? Can’t we really pay the extra few euros out of our own pockets?” she asked.
Cigániková argued that such a universal approach undermines the very concept of aid. “Aid that goes to almost everyone is not aid,” she stated, “and this is the easiest way to buy voters.” She emphasized that politicians are merely redistributing funds already taken from citizens, concluding, “Don’t forget – a politician doesn’t have a single euro of his own. Everything he gives away, he took from you before.”
The MP suggested that the funds allocated to this broad-based program could be better utilized for crucial reforms in areas like healthcare and education. The controversy underscores a growing debate about the government’s economic policies and the effectiveness of its social programs.