Washington — As President Donald Trump prepares to deliver his State of the Union address Tuesday night, California’s congressional delegation is responding with a mix of protest, planned rebuttals, and pointed guest selections. The varied approaches reflect the deep political divisions within the state and the nation, and signal a willingness to directly challenge the President’s message. The focus on the State of the Union address and California’s response to it highlights the ongoing political dynamics between the state and the federal government.
Several California Democrats have announced they will boycott the speech, citing concerns over the President’s conduct and policies. Senator Adam Schiff, a leading voice in the opposition, has been particularly critical, accusing Trump of undermining the rule of law and abusing his power. Schiff described the President as acting as a “personal fiefdom, unbound by the law,” and stated he would not “give him the audience he craves for the lies that he tells.” This decision marks the first time Schiff will miss a State of the Union address.
Joining Schiff in the boycott are Representatives Robert Garcia, Sara Jacobs, Sydney Kamlager-Dove, and Julia Brownley. Their absence is a deliberate statement of protest against the President’s policies and rhetoric. The decision to skip the address underscores the growing rift between many Democrats and the Trump administration, particularly regarding issues like climate change, immigration, and the handling of the Justice Department.
Padilla to Deliver Spanish-Language Response
Although some Democrats are opting to stay away, Senator Alex Padilla will deliver a Spanish-language response to the President’s address. Padilla, the son of immigrants, is expected to focus on issues important to the Latino community and offer a contrasting vision for the country. This response aims to reach a significant segment of the population often overlooked in mainstream political discourse. Padilla was involved in an incident last year where he was tackled in Los Angeles while attempting to question Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem during immigration raids, an event that brought attention to the challenges faced by immigrant communities.
Guests as Statements
Beyond the decisions to attend or boycott, California lawmakers are using their guest lists to build powerful statements. Representative Robert Garcia, despite not attending the speech himself, has invited Annie Farmer, a survivor of abuse by Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. This choice aims to bring attention to the issue of sexual abuse and the need for accountability. Similarly, Representative Eric Swalwell, who will attend the address, is bringing Teresa J. Helm, another survivor of Epstein’s abuse.
The selection of these guests underscores a commitment to highlighting issues often overshadowed by political debates. It also demonstrates a willingness to use the platform of the State of the Union to amplify the voices of those who have been harmed.
A Legacy of Protest and Dramatic Moments
California’s congressional delegation has a history of making bold statements during State of the Union addresses. Perhaps the most memorable moment occurred in 2020, when then-House Speaker Nancy Pelosi dramatically ripped up a copy of President Trump’s speech immediately after he finished delivering it. This act of defiance became a symbol of the intense opposition to Trump’s presidency.
While it remains unclear whether California lawmakers will replicate such a dramatic gesture this year, their planned actions demonstrate a continued willingness to challenge the President and advocate for their constituents. Representative Ken Calvert (R-Corona) is bringing Ben Benoit, the Riverside County auditor-controller, a longtime friend, showcasing a different approach focused on local representation. Pelosi’s guest, the Rev. Devon Jerome Crawford, senior pastor of historic Third Baptist Church of San Francisco, further highlights the diversity of perspectives within the California delegation.
Several lawmakers also plan to unveil surprise guests during the event, adding an element of anticipation to the evening. The choices of these guests will likely offer further insight into the priorities and concerns of California’s representatives.
The State of the Union address is expected to cover a wide range of topics, including the economy, national security, and domestic policy. However, for California’s congressional delegation, the event is also an opportunity to make a statement about their values and their vision for the future. The planned boycotts, rebuttals, and guest selections demonstrate a commitment to holding the President accountable and advocating for the interests of their constituents.
Following the President’s address, attention will turn to the official Republican response and Senator Padilla’s Spanish-language rebuttal. These responses will provide alternative perspectives on the issues raised by the President and offer a glimpse into the political landscape heading into the next election cycle. The coming days will be crucial in shaping the narrative surrounding the State of the Union and its implications for California and the nation.
Readers seeking support related to trauma or abuse can identify resources at the National Sexual Assault Hotline: 1-800-656-HOPE.
The political fallout from the State of the Union address will continue to unfold in the coming days, with lawmakers on both sides of the aisle offering their assessments and outlining their priorities for the year ahead. The next key date to watch is the budget negotiations expected to begin in March, where the President’s proposals will face scrutiny from Congress.
What are your thoughts on the California delegation’s response to the State of the Union? Share your comments below and join the conversation.
