Chennai: The Madras High Court dismissed the case seeking the disqualification of the Tamil Nadu Governor, who holds a lucrative dual office, saying that it was not fit for trial.
Kanchipuram District Father Periyar Dravida Kazhagam Secretary Kannadasan in a petition filed in the Madras High Court said, “RN Ravi took office as the Governor of Tamil Nadu on September 18 last year. He has been a problem person since the day of his inauguration. , is also speaking against Dravida Movement principles. He is delaying the files sent by Tamil Nadu Government without signing them.
Also, RN Ravi has been appointed as the Chairman of Auroville Foundation, Puduvai. Under the Arrowville Foundation Act, 1988, it is stated that the post of Chairman carries a salary and pension. Generally, under Article 158 Clause 2 of the Constitution of India, it is stated that the Governor shall not hold office in any profit-making enterprise. Despite that he is the leader. By this he is acting against the Constitution of India and against the oath he took as Governor. Therefore, he is not eligible to hold the post of Governor. He demanded that he should be sacked.
The case came up for hearing in a bench comprising Chief Justice Raja and Justice Bharatha Chakraborty. At that time, the petitioner said, “The constitution has provided legal protection that the governor cannot be sued. It is related to the functions of the office of the governor. A case can be sued personally regarding his activities.
Also, does Governor Ravi, who is holding a position of profit, remain in office as per the provisions of the law? As should be explained. It was argued that he can be disqualified if he continues in office contrary to the provisions of the law. Arguments were put forward by the petitioner citing various judgments stating that the High Courts have issued notices to the Governor in many states.
After hearing these arguments, the judges adjourned the verdict on whether or not the case is fit for trial without specifying a date. In this case, the judges ordered today (Jan. 5) to dismiss the case saying that this case is not suitable for investigation.