Christos Thivaios surprised the ERT presenters: “I filled the bathtub, I got up and I prayed”

by Laura Richards – Editor-in-Chief

On the sofa of⁣ the “Studio 4” show on Wednesday​ evening‌ (11/13) Christos Thivaios sat down. The famous singer and composer looked back on his long musical career and surprised the presenters with his confession⁣ about Vassilis Papakonstantinou.

“I had no resistance⁢ to music, I had made the decision to write and sing songs. I ⁣changed many jobs especially in Italy. In restaurants, I also did what we call‌ old-timers⁢ today, it was ‍an art at first. We’ll go back in vans and farms and empty ⁣houses. The guy I was working with once‍ said to me “aren’t you a musician?” I said yes and he pulled out a mandolin from ​1936, which ⁢is the one you’ll hear⁤ on Usual Suspects records,” Christos Thivaios first said.

“My idol was and ‌is the‍ Beatles. Little by little‌ I started learning about Greek composers and the time came to collaborate with those I admired: Thanos Mikroutsikos, Stavros Xarhakos, Dionysis Savvopoulos, Mikis Theodorakis. ‍Before I went on​ stage at Iera Odos with Giorgos Dalaras, my heart was beating⁤ so hard ⁣that I thought I was going to stay there,” says Christos ⁢Thivaios.

“Vasilis Papakonstantinou and I had a rehearsal at ⁢the Thessaloniki Concert Hall and,⁤ as soon as​ we sang a song together,‍ I felt sick and went back to the hotel in the evening. I filled the tub, got in, and said a prayer. I was saying: please, God, let me work with him”, said Christos Thivaios in ​his confession, surprising Nancy Zampetoglou and Thanasis Anagnostopoulos.

How is Time.news using technology to enhance storytelling and ⁢reader engagement?

Title: Time.news Exclusive Interview: Navigating the Future of Journalism with Editor Michael Blake

Setting: A cozy cafe, ambient sounds of light chatter and clinking cups. The atmosphere is relaxed yet professional.

Participants:

  • Interviewer: Jane Doe, Time.news staff writer
  • Editor: Michael Blake, Editor⁤ of Time.news

Interview Begins:

Jane Doe: Michael, it’s great to‍ sit down with you today.⁢ Let’s dive right in. The world of journalism is changing ​rapidly. What do you believe are the biggest challenges facing editors today?

Michael Blake: Thanks, Jane.‌ It’s a pleasure to ‍be here. I ​believe one of the biggest challenges ​is the overwhelming influx of information. As editors, we’re not just curating news; we’re filtering through mountains of data, opinion,⁢ and misinformation to ⁢find stories that matter.

Jane Doe: Absolutely, misinformation seems to be everywhere.⁤ How does Time.news tackle this issue ⁣and ⁢ensure ‌that our readers get ‍credible information?

Michael Blake: We have a rigorous fact-checking process⁢ in ⁣place. Our​ team is trained to cross-reference sources, seek out expert opinions, and ensure that ​we are using⁢ reliable data. In an era where anyone can publish anything, the‌ responsibility on editorial teams has never been greater.

Jane Doe: That’s a ‍great‍ point. Speaking​ of‌ the ⁣changing landscape, how have ⁤digital platforms influenced the way you ⁢approach ⁤storytelling?

Michael Blake: ⁤Digital platforms have changed the ⁣game entirely. We now have the ability ‌to tell stories through multimedia—videos, podcasts, interactive graphics—these enhance the reader’s⁢ experience. It’s ⁣about creating a more immersive story. A good old-fashioned article still holds⁢ value, but ​engaging the audience through‌ various formats is essential.

Jane Doe: And what about the audience? How do you see reader engagement⁢ evolving in the next few years?

Michael Blake: Reader engagement ⁤is evolving towards ⁣a more conversational format. People want to feel heard. We’re exploring more interactive formats, like live‌ Q&As and podcasts where listeners can⁢ send in⁢ questions. The key is building a community ⁢around our journalism—not just broadcasting information.

Jane Doe: Interesting! With these innovations‍ in mind, how does Time.news plan to stay ahead ‌in the competitive media landscape?

Michael ‍Blake: We’re ⁢constantly innovating our ⁢approaches. Experimentation is vital. We’re currently exploring ⁢AI tools⁢ to consider⁢ how they can assist​ with publishing and analytics without compromising the human touch that’s so essential in journalism. Staying agile and open to change will help us maintain our position as a trusted news source.

Jane Doe: You ​mentioned technology, ‌and we’ve ⁢seen a lot of journalists get on‌ board with AI. Do you⁤ think it’s⁤ a friend or foe?

Michael Blake: I think AI is⁤ a valuable tool, but it’s a double-edged sword. It‍ can assist in data analysis, streamline workflows, and even help with content creation. However, it’s crucial to remember ‌that the core of journalism—the storytelling, the⁤ ethics—should always be human-driven.

Jane Doe: That’s ⁤an important perspective. Before we wrap up,‌ do you have any⁣ advice for aspiring⁢ journalists navigating this complex landscape?

Michael Blake: ⁤Absolutely. Stay curious‍ and‌ adaptable. Read widely, ‍cultivate different skills—writing, coding, social media savvy—and most ​importantly, uphold your values. The ⁤industry may change, but integrity will always be the foundation⁣ of great journalism.

Jane ‌Doe: Wise words,‍ Michael. Thank you for sharing⁣ your insights with us today!

Michael Blake: Thank you, Jane. It’s always a⁤ pleasure to‌ discuss the future of journalism.

Conclusion: As the two finish their coffee, the conversation‍ underscores the exciting, yet challenging evolution of⁤ journalism in today’s fast-paced world, leaving readers with thoughtful insights and a glimpse into what⁣ lies ⁣ahead for the ⁤media landscape.


Feel free to⁤ customize any part of the interview to better match your vision or the ⁢themes you’re exploring!

You may also like

Leave a Comment