The atmosphere at this year’s CinemaCon convention in Las Vegas was defined by a palpable sense of anxiety, as theater owners voiced a fierce opposition to the proposed merger between Paramount Skydance and Warner Bros. Discovery. While Hollywood executives often frame consolidation as a necessary evolution for survival in the streaming age, those who operate the actual screens see a different reality: a future with fewer films and less leverage.
The tension has culminated in a grassroots movement within the industry, with attendees sporting white buttons emblazoned with “#Block the merger” in red font. For many exhibitors, the question of why theater owners are balking at Hollywood’s latest mega deal comes down to a fundamental fear that too much power in too few hands will starve the big screen of content.
Michael O’Leary, president and chief executive of Cinema United, made the trade group’s position clear during a keynote address on Tuesday, arguing that the combination of these two studios would be “harmful to exhibition, consumers and the entire entertainment ecosystem.” O’Leary warned that the industry has a documented history where consolidation leads to a decrease in the volume of films produced specifically for theatrical release.
The risk of distributor dominance
The primary concern for theater owners is not just the number of movies, but the terms under which they are shown. By merging two of the world’s most influential studios, the resulting entity would wield unprecedented control over the logistics of movie-going.
According to O’Leary, further concentrating marketplace power allows a smaller group of distributors to unilaterally dictate critical factors, including:
- Theatrical windows: The amount of time a film plays exclusively in theaters before moving to digital platforms.
- Screen placement: Which movies get the prime auditoriums and the most frequent showtimes.
- Scheduling: The timing of releases that can either create a blockbuster season or crowd out smaller films.
- Catalog access: The ability for theaters to screen historic films from the studios’ vast libraries.
“Further concentrating marketplace power… Will have a real and lasting impact on Main Street and millions of movie fans around the world,” O’Leary said, suggesting that the ripple effects of the deal would extend far beyond the boardroom and into local communities.
The debt dilemma and production promises
Paramount Chief Executive David Ellison has attempted to soothe these fears by pledging that the combined company will maintain a steady output of 30 films per year—splitting the slate evenly with 15 films each from the Warner Bros. And Paramount brands. However, theater owners remain skeptical of the math behind the promise.
Industry analysts and exhibitors point to the staggering financial burden the new company would carry. The combined entity would be saddled with approximately estimated debt of $79 billion, a figure that critics argue makes aggressive production and marketing goals unrealistic.
| Metric | Proposed Target | Exhibitor Concern |
|---|---|---|
| Annual Film Slate | 30 Films (15 per studio) | Likely to drop due to cost-cutting |
| Combined Debt | $79 Billion | Limits marketing and production budgets |
| Market Power | Consolidated Control | Reduced leverage for independent theaters |
If the merger proceeds despite the opposition, Cinema United intends to fight for “guardrails.” O’Leary noted during a press breakfast Tuesday that the group will seek formal commitments regarding film marketing expenditures and minimum production numbers to ensure the theatrical experience isn’t sacrificed for the sake of the balance sheet.
The streaming wildcard and the fight for U.S. Production
The anxiety over consolidation isn’t limited to traditional studios. The shadow of streaming continues to loom over the exhibition business. O’Leary revealed that the Cinema United board recently met with Netflix co-Chief Executive Ted Sarandos in Las Vegas. The meeting, originally scheduled when Netflix was considering a move for Warner, focused on finding a sustainable way for the streaming giant and theater owners to collaborate.
While the merger dominates the conversation, a separate crisis—the “offshoring” of film production—is as well driving the industry’s political agenda. Charles Rivkin, Chief Executive and Chairman of the Motion Picture Association (MPA), announced that the studio lobbying group is pushing for a federal film tax incentive.
The goal is to create a federal credit that could “stack” on top of existing state-level incentives, such as those in California, to make the United States more competitive against international production hubs. Rivkin stated that the MPA is working with congressional leaders and appointed “Hollywood ambassadors” to lure production work back to U.S. Soil.
“We are fighting daily to reach that goal,” Rivkin said during his Tuesday speech. “And we will keep fighting to make America a more competitive place to make movies.”
As the industry looks toward the coming months, the focus will shift toward state and federal regulators to see if the Paramount-Warner deal will face antitrust scrutiny. The next major checkpoint will be the official filing of the merger’s impact statements, which will provide a clearer picture of the expected layoffs and production cuts.
Do you think studio consolidation is hurting the movie-going experience? Share your thoughts in the comments below.
