DENVER – Colorado lawmakers are considering a first-of-its-kind measure that would levy a 5% fee on in-game purchases – often called microtransactions – within popular online games like Roblox and Minecraft, potentially generating over $20 million annually for the state’s public schools. The proposal, embedded within a broader bill focused on children’s data privacy online, has sparked debate over whether it constitutes a tax on children and whether it could face legal challenges.
House Bill 1148, currently before the Colorado House Judiciary Committee, aims to strengthen protections for young users of online platforms. But the proposed fee on “add-on transactions,” as the bill defines them, has quickly become a focal point. Proponents argue it’s a way for the gaming industry to contribute to the education of the children who fuel its profits, while opponents raise concerns about its legality and potential impact on players and developers. The core issue revolves around House Bill 1148 and its potential to reshape how online gaming revenue is allocated in the state.
The bill’s sponsor, Rep. Jenny Willford, a Northglenn Democrat, framed the fee as a matter of fairness. “If kids are spending money in your ecosystem,” she said during a Wednesday hearing, “then a portion of that should arrive back to support their well-being in the real world.” A state estimate projects the 5% fee could generate over $20 million each year for public education, funds that could be directed towards critical resources and programs.
A Broader Push for Online Child Safety
While the financial implications are significant, the bill’s origins lie in growing concerns about online child safety. Lawmakers cited ongoing lawsuits alleging that Roblox, a hugely popular platform for young gamers, has failed to adequately protect children from adult predators. The bill seeks to address data privacy issues and provide greater transparency regarding how children’s information is collected and used by online gaming companies. It likewise aims to give parents more control over their children’s online activities.
The legislation isn’t solely focused on Roblox. It applies to any online gaming platform that collects personal data from users under the age of 13. This includes popular games like Minecraft, Fortnite, and others where in-game purchases are common. The bill requires platforms to obtain verifiable parental consent before collecting, using, or disclosing a child’s personal information.
Concerns Over Proposition 117 and the Definition of a “Tax”
Despite the bill’s stated goals, Republican lawmakers have voiced strong opposition, particularly regarding the proposed fee. Rep. Ava Flanell, a Colorado Springs Republican, argued that the fee amounts to “essentially taxing children.” Rep. Matt Soper, a Republican from Delta, repeatedly questioned whether the measure would violate Proposition 117, a 2020 ballot initiative that requires voter approval for any fee that would generate $100 million or more in its first five years.
Proposition 117, passed with 52.3% of the vote, was intended to limit the state’s ability to raise revenue through fees without direct voter consent. Soper’s concerns center on whether the projected $20 million annual revenue from the gaming fee could ultimately exceed the $100 million threshold over the five-year period. Bill sponsors, including Rep. Yara Zokaie, a Fort Collins Democrat, acknowledged these concerns and indicated they were exploring potential amendments to address them. Zokaie noted that the fee was “not put in place as a deterrent” to in-game purchases, but rather “to give children a chance to give back to programs that help them.” She also pointed out that, “it is mostly parents’ money. I can attest to that.”
Industry Opposition and Potential Legal Challenges
The proposed fee has drawn sharp criticism from the gaming industry. Representatives from the Entertainment Software Association (ESA), the trade association for the video game industry, and TechNet, a network of technology CEOs, testified against the bill, arguing it is likely to face legal challenges. They contend that the fee could violate the Commerce Clause of the U.S. Constitution, which prohibits states from enacting laws that unduly burden interstate commerce. The ESA has previously challenged similar measures in other states.
The industry also argues that the fee could disproportionately impact smaller game developers and stifle innovation. They claim that it would create an uneven playing field and discourage investment in the Colorado gaming market. The potential for a lawsuit looms large, adding another layer of uncertainty to the bill’s future.
Support from Education and Child Advocacy Groups
Despite industry opposition, the bill has garnered support from a coalition of education and child advocacy groups. The Boys & Girls Club and the Colorado Coalition Against Sexual Assault are among the organizations that have voiced their support. Several individuals who testified before the committee described themselves as longtime gamers who believe stricter protections for children are necessary. They argued that the gaming industry has a responsibility to contribute to the well-being of its young users.
Supporters envision the funds generated by the fee being used to support after-school programs, mental health services, and other initiatives that benefit Colorado’s students. A proposed amendment, mentioned by bill sponsors but not formally introduced, would specifically allocate a portion of the revenue to after-school programs.
The House Judiciary Committee postponed a vote on the bill, allowing sponsors time to address concerns raised by Republican lawmakers and refine the language regarding Proposition 117. The next step is a rescheduled hearing where the committee will consider amendments and potentially vote on whether to advance the bill to the full House. The bill’s fate remains uncertain, but it has already sparked a crucial conversation about the intersection of online gaming, child safety, and public education funding in Colorado.
This is a developing story. Check back for updates as the bill moves through the legislative process.
If you or someone you know is experiencing a mental health crisis, please contact the 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline by calling or texting 988 in the US and Canada, or dialing 111 in the UK. These services are available 24/7, free, and confidential.
