Europe’s Military Mineral Rush

The global race for critical minerals is intensifying, mirroring the 20th-century scramble for oil and reshaping geopolitical power dynamics. Are we on the brink of a new era where access to these resources dictates national security and economic stability?

The New Geopolitical Battlefield: Critical Minerals and Defense

Critical minerals are the unsung heroes of modern military might. From fighter jets to advanced interaction systems, these raw materials are indispensable. But Europe’s reliance on foreign suppliers poses a notable vulnerability.

The European Union has pinpointed 34 critical raw materials vital for its economy and security,with 17 deemed “strategic” due to supply risks and their pivotal role in key industries. While often associated with green and digital transitions, many are fundamental to Europe’s defense capabilities.

Key Minerals powering Europe’s Defense

According to Benedetta Girardi, an analyst at The Hague Centre for Strategic Studies, graphite, cobalt, titanium, gallium, and germanium are particularly crucial for Europe’s armed forces.

• Graphite: Strengthens aircraft frames, naval vessels, and armored vehicles.
• Cobalt: Used in high-performance alloys for jet engines and naval turbines.
• Titanium: Essential in fighter jets, submarines, tanks, and ammunition due to its strength and corrosion resistance.
• Gallium and Germanium: Key components in semiconductors and chips embedded in modern defense platforms.

Expert Tip: Diversifying supply chains and investing in domestic processing capabilities are crucial steps for Europe to reduce its dependence on geopolitical rivals.

China‘s Dominance and the Supply Chain Squeeze

Europe’s Achilles’ heel lies in its lack of domestic extraction and processing capacity.Supply chains are heavily concentrated in the hands of geopolitical competitors, particularly China.

• China controls 69% of global graphite production.
• China owns 15 of the 19 major cobalt mines in the Democratic Republic of Congo.
• China accounts for over 90% of global gallium and germanium output.

China’s dominance extends beyond extraction to processing, giving it significant leverage over the global supply of these critical minerals.

The Semiconductor Standoff: A Wake-Up Call for Europe

In 2023, after the U.S. imposed stricter export controls on advanced semiconductors to China, Beijing retaliated with export controls on gallium, germanium, and antimony. By early 2024, Europe felt the impact: Chinese germanium and antimony exports plummeted by 39% and 57%, respectively, while gallium shipments dwindled to nearly zero.

Did You Know? The U.S. is also heavily reliant on China for critical minerals. This shared vulnerability underscores the need for a coordinated Western strategy to secure supply chains.

The American Outlook: Lessons for the US and Europe

The situation in europe offers valuable lessons for the United States, which faces similar challenges in securing critical mineral supplies.The U.S. also relies heavily on foreign sources,particularly China,for many of these essential materials.

The US Response: Building resilience

The U.S.government is taking steps to address this vulnerability, including:

• Investing in domestic mining and processing: The Biden management has allocated billions of dollars to support domestic production of critical minerals through the Bipartisan infrastructure Law and the Inflation Reduction Act.
• Diversifying supply chains: The U.S. is working with allies to develop choice sources of critical minerals, including partnerships with countries in Africa, South America, and Australia.
• Promoting recycling and reuse: the U.S. is encouraging the development of technologies to recycle and reuse critical minerals from electronic waste and other sources.

Quick Fact: The U.S. Geological Survey estimates that the U.S. has significant reserves of many critical minerals,but developing these resources will require overcoming environmental and regulatory hurdles.

The Rwanda Mineral Pact and Ethical Sourcing

The EU’s strategic partnership with Rwanda was suspended after reports surfaced that many exported minerals originated from the conflict-ridden eastern Democratic Republic of Congo, where the Rwandan-backed M23 group controls key mining areas. This highlights the ethical complexities of securing critical minerals.

The Ethical Imperative: Balancing Security and Responsibility

the Rwanda case underscores the importance of responsible sourcing and due diligence in the critical minerals supply chain. Companies and governments must ensure that their pursuit of these resources does not contribute to conflict, human rights abuses, or environmental degradation.

Reader Poll: Do you think governments should prioritize ethical sourcing of critical minerals, even if it means higher costs and potential supply disruptions?

Europe’s Critical Raw Materials Strategy: A Path Forward

Europe’s critical raw materials strategy is still evolving, but the direction is clear: greater resilience, stronger and diverse partnerships, and a more intentional link between defense needs and global responsibility. The challenge lies in aligning defense, climate, and industrial priorities under a coherent European strategy.

Key Elements of Europe’s Strategy

• Boosting domestic production: Investing in exploration, mining, and processing within Europe.
• Diversifying supply sources: Forging partnerships with reliable allies and reducing dependence on China.
• promoting circular economy: Enhancing recycling and reuse of critical minerals.
• Strengthening international cooperation: Working with the U.S. and other partners to develop common standards and address supply chain vulnerabilities.

Expert Tip: Collaboration between the public and private sectors is essential for the success of Europe’s critical raw materials strategy. Governments can provide incentives and regulatory frameworks, while companies can bring innovation and expertise.

FAQ: Critical Minerals and Geopolitics

What are critical minerals?

Critical minerals are raw materials essential for modern technologies and industries, facing supply risks due to geological scarcity, geopolitical issues, trade policies, or other factors.

Why are critical minerals crucial for defense?

They are vital for manufacturing military equipment like aircraft, missiles, communication systems, and other advanced technologies, ensuring national security.

Which countries dominate the critical mineral supply chain?

China is the dominant player, controlling significant portions of global production and processing for minerals like graphite, gallium, and germanium.

What is the EU doing to secure its critical mineral supply?

The EU is implementing strategies to diversify supply sources,boost domestic production,promote recycling,and strengthen international cooperation.

What can the US learn from Europe’s challenges?

The US can learn the importance of diversifying supply chains, investing in domestic production, and ensuring ethical sourcing to avoid over-reliance on geopolitical rivals.

Pros and Cons: Securing Critical Mineral Supplies

Pros:

• Enhanced national security: Reduced reliance on foreign suppliers strengthens defense capabilities.
• Economic growth: Investment in domestic mining and processing creates jobs and stimulates innovation.
• Geopolitical leverage: Access to critical minerals enhances a country’s influence in international affairs.
• Technological advancement: Secure access to these materials fosters innovation in key industries.

Cons:

• Environmental impact: Mining and processing can have negative environmental consequences.
• Geopolitical tensions: Competition for resources can exacerbate international conflicts.
• Ethical concerns: Sourcing from conflict zones can contribute to human rights abuses.
• economic costs: Developing domestic production and diversifying supply chains can be expensive.

The Road Ahead: A Call for Action

The race for critical minerals is a defining challenge of our time. For both Europe and the united States, securing access to these resources is essential for national security, economic prosperity, and technological leadership. By embracing a thorough strategy that prioritizes resilience, diversification, ethical sourcing, and international cooperation, we can navigate this complex landscape and build a more secure and lasting future.

Military experts explain why US bases in Europe matter.

Learn More

Europe’s Edge

CEPA’s online journal covering critical topics on the foreign policy docket across Europe and North America.

Read More

The Critical Minerals Race: A New Geopolitical Battlefield?

An Interview with Dr. Aris Thorne on the Geopolitical Implications of Critical Mineral Dependence

The race for critical minerals is intensifying, mirroring the historical scramble for oil. But what does this mean for national security and economic stability? To understand the emerging realities,Time.news spoke with Dr. Aris Thorne, a leading expert in resource geopolitics and supply chain security.

Time.news: Dr. Thorne, thanks for joining us. This Time.news report highlights how critical minerals are essential for modern military capabilities.Could you elaborate on why these resources are so crucial for nations’ defence sectors?

Dr. Aris Thorne: Absolutely. Modern defense systems, from fighter jets to advanced interaction technologies, are incredibly complex and reliant on specialized materials. Minerals like graphite strengthen aircraft frames and naval vessels, cobalt is vital for high-performance jet engines, titanium is crucial in fighter jets and submarines due to its strength, and gallium and germanium are key components in the semiconductors powering modern defense platforms. Without consistent access to these critical minerals, a nation’s military readiness and technological edge could be severely compromised.

Time.news: The report emphasizes Europe’s vulnerability due to its reliance on foreign suppliers, especially China.Is this a uniquely European problem, or are other regions also at risk?

Dr. Aris Thorne: While Europe faces notable challenges, this is a global issue. The US is also heavily reliant on China for critical minerals. The concentration of supply chains in the hands of a single dominant player creates a situation ripe for geopolitical leverage. We saw a glimpse of this in 2023 when China imposed export controls on gallium and germanium following U.S. semiconductor restrictions. This sent a clear message about the potential disruptions in the industry and the impact of securing critical mineral supplies.

Time.news: The article points to China’s dominance in the extraction and processing of minerals like graphite, cobalt, gallium, and germanium. What are the key factors contributing to this dominance?

Dr. aris Thorne: Several factors are at play. Firstly, China has made strategic investments in mining infrastructure globally, including significant ownership stakes in mines in resource-rich countries like the Democratic Republic of Congo. Secondly, they have heavily invested in the processing and refining capabilities, frequently enough exceeding those of other nations.This combination of resource access and advanced refining technology gives them significant control over the global supply chain of critical minerals.

Time.news: What should governments and businesses be doing to mitigate these risks and ensure reliable access to these essential resources?

Dr. Aris Thorne: the key is a multi-pronged approach.Diversifying supply chains is paramount. This means exploring and developing alternative sources of minerals in friendly nations, such as Australia, Canada, and countries in South America and Africa. Investing in domestic mining and processing capabilities reduces reliance on foreign entities and stimulates economic growth. Promoting recycling and reuse of critical minerals from electronic waste and other sources creates a more circular economy and lessens the need for new extraction. international cooperation and the ethical sourcing of critical minerals are vital to ensure that the pursuit of these resources does not contribute to conflict or human rights abuses.

Time.news: The article mentions the EU’s strategy and the US response, including legislation like the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law and the Inflation Reduction Act. Are these measures sufficient?

Dr. Aris Thorne: These are positive steps, but sustained commitment and further action are needed. Government funding is crucial, but regulatory streamlining to facilitate domestic mining and processing is also essential. Furthermore, there needs to be a focus on developing a skilled workforce and promoting technological innovation in the sector. It’s not just about identifying resources but also about developing the means to extract and process them efficiently and sustainably. The key is to align defense, climate, and sustainable progress initiatives in a coherent National Strategy.

Time.news: Ethical sourcing is highlighted in the report, notably concerning the EU’s partnership with Rwanda. What steps can companies and governments take to ensure that their critical mineral supply chains are ethical and sustainable?

Dr.Aris Thorne: Due diligence is crucial.Companies must conduct thorough risk assessments of their supply chains, tracing the origins of the minerals they use. Utilizing certifications like those adhering to the OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas is critically important. Collaboration with NGOs monitors human rights abuses, promotes openness, and creates a more ethical and sustainable supply chain.

Time.news: what should average citizen know and understand about this race for critical minerals?

Dr.aris Thorne: It’s important for people to realize that the technology they use every day, from smartphones to electric vehicles, depends on these minerals. Understanding the geopolitical implications of our reliance on these resources is essential for informed citizens. Supporting policies and companies prioritizing responsible sourcing, recycling, and ethical practices will ensure that this race for critical minerals doesn’t compromise our values or our future.

Time.news: Dr. Thorne, thank you for sharing your insights on this complex and crucial issue.

Dr. Aris Thorne: My pleasure.