Far-left activists wanted to prevent the book presentation of the leader of the Patriots (video)

by Laura Richards – Editor-in-Chief

The ​police had to hermetically seal off the area and protect the building ⁢with riot police so that Jordan Bardella‘s book presentation could take place and that no one​ would get ​hurt. The enraged demonstrators attacked the police several times, and for a while the participants of the book presentation could not​ even leave the area, and the journalists who were​ doing‌ their work were​ also threatened by the anti-fascists, reports the about the action of extreme leftists the Hungarian Nation.

Far-left groups do not shy away from violence

Jordan Bardella, president of Le Pen’s National Consolidation and at the same time the Patriots for Europe party association, held⁢ a book launch with ⁣an autograph, ‍which was ⁣not viewed favorably by the anti-fascists. Since they could not prevent this from happening in ​advance, they wanted to disrupt the event itself.

Far-left organizations applied for ‌and received permission to assemble at the location.

The police secured the ⁣location with large forces, and even closed all the surrounding streets ⁢with barbed wire barricades, meaning that they expected the demonstration to cause ​serious disorder.

This was confirmed,⁢ the police line was repeatedly attacked in an ⁤organized manner by the antifa, which was repulsed by the riot police with a water cannon.

In addition to chanting anti-fascist rhymes, they tried‍ to disrupt the event with light and sound devices.

Earlier, they tried to make the National Conservatism Conference impossible

In the spring, they⁣ tried to make the National⁢ Conservatism Conference in the ‍center⁢ of the Union impossible by putting political pressure on several event ⁤venues that wanted⁢ to‍ host the event, and then the district mayor simply banned the⁣ event. In autumn, the head of the Mathias Corvinus Collegium office ⁤in Brussels wanted to present his book, ‍a few corners from the European ⁣Commission ‌building, but the bookstore ⁤informed Professor Frank Füredi at the​ last minute ⁣that it would not provide the opportunity for the book presentation.

!(function (f, b, e, v, n, t, s) {
if (f.fbq) return;
n = f.fbq = function () {
n.callMethod ? n.callMethod.apply(n, arguments) : n.queue.push(arguments);
};
if (!f._fbq) f._fbq = n;
n.push = n;
n.loaded = !0;
n.version = ‘2.0’;
n.queue = [];
t = b.createElement(e);
t.async = !0;
t.src = v;
s = b.getElementsByTagName(e)[0];
s.parentNode.insertBefore(t, s);
})(window, document, ‘script’, ‘
fbq(‘init’, ‘1637596699829896’);
fbq(‘track’, ‘PageView’);

Time.news‌ Editor: Good ⁤afternoon, and welcome to this ​special interview. ‍Today, ⁣we’re diving into a pressing issue that has caught the ‌attention of many: the tensions surrounding political events in​ Europe. ​We’re joined by Dr. Elena Novak, a political sociologist specializing in far-left and far-right⁣ movements in Europe. Dr. Novak, thank you for joining us!

Dr. Elena Novak: Thank you for having me.​ It’s a pleasure to discuss these critical developments.

Time.news Editor: To ⁣begin, let’s set the⁢ scene. Recently, Jordan ⁢Bardella,​ president of Le Pen’s ⁤National Consolidation party, held a ​book⁢ presentation that was met with significant opposition from far-left‍ groups. ⁤The police ⁢even had to cordon off the area to protect attendees. What does this tell us about the current‌ political climate in Europe?

Dr. Elena Novak: It highlights a deeply polarized environment. ‍The⁣ tensions⁣ we see⁤ today stem from a clash of ideologies—where ⁤far-right figures like Bardella face strong resistance from anti-fascist groups. The need for police ⁤intervention indicates not‌ just a concern for public order but also‌ the intensity of ⁣these ideological conflicts.

Time.news⁤ Editor: You mentioned the ⁢polarization. Far-left groups, as we’ve seen, are not shying away from⁤ using violence; they gathered with permission to protest Bardella’s event. Is this a sign⁢ of increasing radicalization among‌ protest movements?

Dr. Elena Novak: Absolutely. The willingness to confront⁤ perceived threats with aggression suggests ⁤a strategic shift⁣ within ‍some activist circles. They ‍see prominent ⁤figures associated with far-right politics⁤ as existential threats to democratic values and ‍social justice. This can lead to a more confrontational approach, as we’ve witnessed.

Time.news⁢ Editor: Interestingly, despite the risk of violence, police force was deployed ‍heavily to ensure ‍the event took place. What ⁣does this indicate about law enforcement’s role in these conflicts?

Dr. Elena Novak: The⁣ heavy police presence signals an attempt to maintain order in a situation ⁣where tensions are ‍expected to ⁤boil⁣ over. It also reflects the state’s recognition of the increasing volatility of political activism, particularly when it relates to ‍controversial figures. However,⁢ it raises questions​ about the ‍balance between protecting free speech and ensuring public safety.

Time.news Editor: And what about the implications for democracy? When protests become increasingly violent,⁣ how does this‌ affect public discourse?

Dr. Elena Novak: Violence often stifles constructive dialogue. When discussions about ideology devolve⁤ into physical ⁤confrontations,⁣ it alienates moderate​ voices ‌and pushes people toward the extremes. This can create a feedback loop of radicalization on both sides, making compromise increasingly difficult.

Time.news‍ Editor: You mentioned ⁤compromise. Is there a path⁣ forward? What steps can be taken⁢ to mitigate such conflicts in the future?

Dr. Elena Novak: Building inclusive platforms for dialogue is crucial. Community engagement efforts that involve various stakeholders—from civil society organizations to local government—could facilitate understanding and reduce tensions. Additionally, addressing the root causes of discontent, such ‍as economic inequality and social injustice, might diminish the appeal⁤ of extremist ‌ideologies.

Time.news Editor: That’s a constructive viewpoint.⁣ As we‌ wrap up,⁣ what do you hope the general public takes away from the events surrounding Bardella’s book launch ⁤and⁤ similar incidents?

Dr. Elena Novak: It’s ‍vital ⁢to recognize the importance​ of informed dialogue over conflict. These events serve as a reminder of the fragility of democratic discourse and ⁣the need​ for peaceful engagement ⁢and ‌mutual respect, even ⁢when opinions differ drastically.

Time.news Editor: Thank you, Dr. Novak, for‍ your insights⁢ today. This conversation is important for‍ understanding the ⁢dynamics at ⁤play in today’s Europe. We appreciate your ⁤time and expertise.

Dr. Elena Novak: Thank you for having me. It’s been a pleasure discussing these vital issues with you.

You may also like

Leave a Comment