Gaute Skjervø, the leader of the Workers’ Youth League (AUF), is now carrying a panic alarm following a surge of targeted threats and harassment that has escalated into reports of doxing and calls for violence. The security measure comes as the organization files multiple police reports against individuals who have used social media to target Skjervø with hate speech, some of which explicitly references the trauma of the July 22 terror attacks.
The escalation follows Skjervø’s recent appearance on the NRK program “Debatten,” where he spoke on the topic of racism. The discussion was sparked by reports that Hårek Hansen, a former advisor to the Progress Party (Frp), had referred to Pakistanis as “minus-variants” in a recorded conversation. In the wake of the broadcast, Skjervø describes a “tidal wave” of aggression across Facebook and X (formerly Twitter), consisting of thousands of comments designed to intimidate and destabilize.
For Skjervø, the harassment is not merely a political disagreement but a personal assault that reaches into his private life. He reports that attackers have claimed to know his home address and neighborhood, have monitored his movements in his local community, and have directed racist and hateful comments toward his wife. Most disturbingly, some messages have suggested that Skjervø should have been killed during the 2011 attacks on Utøya or should be executed now.
A Pattern of Targeted Intimidation
The nature of the threats suggests a coordinated effort to silence political leadership through fear. Skjervø, who is himself a survivor of the July 22 attacks, noted that while he has faced harassment before, the current volume is unprecedented. The attacks are not limited to general insults but include specific, threatening observations of his daily life, a tactic often used to signal that the target is being watched.
Despite the severity of the threats, Skjervø maintains a resolve rooted in the history of his organization. “The organization I lead was attacked and subjected to the worst violence imaginable,” Skjervø said, reflecting on the 77 lives lost 15 years ago. “We rose after July 22—and we will remain standing in this storm.”
However, the personal toll is evident. Skjervø admitted to feeling exhausted by the “cost” of his position, stating that he would be hesitant to recommend his current role to a loved one given the current climate of hostility. This sentiment highlights a growing concern among Norwegian political figures regarding the sustainability of public service in an era of unchecked digital vitriol.
Legal Action and Security Intelligence
The AUF has moved beyond internal monitoring to formal legal action. Halvor Endrerud, General Secretary of the AUF, confirmed that the organization filed police reports on Thursday involving 10 specific posts. Endrerud stated that these posts constitute “gross harassment,” with several containing explicit calls for violence.
The Norwegian Police Security Service (PST) has confirmed it is aware of the situation. Martin Bernsen, a senior advisor for PST, stated that the agency has received information regarding the case and is currently conducting an investigation, though he declined to comment on the specific contents of the evidence.
The AUF is currently reviewing a wider array of messages that they describe as being “on the borderline” of legality. The organization is awaiting the police’s decision on whether to pursue formal charges before releasing more details about the content of the reported messages.
The Broader Impact on Youth and Minorities
While the attacks on Skjervø are high-profile due to his leadership role, the AUF warns that This represents part of a systemic problem affecting its youngest members. Endrerud expressed particular concern for 15- and 16-year-olds within the organization, specifically young girls of Muslim background who are being targeted on platforms like TikTok.
To quantify this trend, the AUF conducted an internal survey in 2025. The results suggest a disturbing normalization of hate speech related to Norway’s national tragedy.
| Metric | Percentage / Figure |
|---|---|
| Members exposed to July 22-related hate | 26% |
| Members who saw content praising the terrorist | 68.6% |
| Total survey respondents | 389 |
According to Endrerud, the fact that nearly 70% of respondents have encountered content glorifying the perpetrator of the July 22 attacks should be a cause for national alarm. He argued that the glorification of violence is an unacceptable boundary to cross in a democratic society, noting the absurdity that an organization already defined by its recovery from mass murder must spend its daily resources fighting the same hatred 15 years later.
The situation reflects a widening gap in Norwegian political discourse, where the line between rigorous debate and criminal harassment is increasingly blurred. The AUF’s experience suggests that the digital landscape has provided a megaphone for extremist views that were previously marginalized, creating a persistent environment of threat for those associated with the Labour Party and its youth wing.
Note: If you or someone you know has been affected by violence or is struggling with the aftermath of traumatic events, support is available. In Norway, you can contact the National Crisis Line or local mental health services for assistance.
The next critical development in this case will be the conclusion of the PST’s initial investigation and the subsequent decision by prosecutors on whether to bring formal charges against the individuals identified in the AUF’s police reports.
Join the conversation: Do you believe current social media regulations are sufficient to protect political figures from targeted harassment? Share your thoughts in the comments below.
