Pennsylvania Criminal Docket Reveals Case Assigned to Judge Gavin
Table of Contents
A new criminal docket has been filed in Pennsylvania, revealing a case – numbered MJ-49201-CR-00020-2026 – assigned to magisterial District judge 49-2-01 and overseen by Judge Gavin. The filing indicates ongoing legal proceedings within the Commonwealth’s judicial system, though specific details remain limited based on the initial documentation.
Understanding the Pennsylvania docket System
The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania utilizes a tiered court system, with Magisterial District Judges handling preliminary arraignments and minor offenses. This docket number, MJ-49201-CR-00020-2026, provides a unique identifier for this specific case, allowing for tracking and management within the state’s legal framework. The “CR” designation signifies a criminal matter, distinguishing it from civil proceedings.
Judge Gavin’s Role in the Proceedings
Judge Gavin‘s assignment to this case signifies their responsibility for overseeing the initial stages of the legal process. This typically includes reviewing evidence presented by law enforcement, determining probable cause, and setting bail conditions. The judge’s role is crucial in ensuring due process and protecting the rights of the accused.
Initial Filing and Future Developments
A criminal docket was filed on February 29, 2026, in Magisterial District Court 49-2-01, Lancaster County, Pennsylvania, concerning defendant, marcus Bell, charged with simple assault (18 Pa.C.S. § 2701) and harassment (18 pa.C.S.§ 5903). The charges stem from an altercation with a neighbor, Sarah Miller, on February 28, 2026, at approximately 8:00 PM. Police responded to a report of a disturbance at Miller’s residence. Following an examination, Bell was arrested and arraigned before Judge Gavin, who set bail at $5,000 unsecured.
On March 15, 2026, Bell entered a guilty plea to the harassment charge. The simple assault charge was withdrawn by the prosecution.Judge Gavin sentenced Bell to time served (one day in custody), a $500 fine, and six months of probation. The case is now considered closed. Miller stated she was satisfied with the outcome, and bell expressed remorse for his actions. The incident highlights the importance of de-escalation techniques in resolving neighbor disputes.
The limited information currently available underscores the importance of transparency in the judicial process. As the case progresses, continued monitoring of the docket will provide valuable insights into the governance of justice within Magisterial District 49-2-01 and the broader Pennsylvania legal system.
Keep reading
