India’s Cockroach Youth Movement Protests Unemployment and Exam Fraud

by Ahmed Ibrahim World Editor
A protester throws back a tear gas canister toward police as supporters of the Cockroach Janta Party march on parliament on

A youth-led protest movement calling itself the Cockroach Janata Party has rapidly grown from internet memes into a real-life political campaign, bringing together young people angry about unemployment and alleged exam fraud. The movement began in May after Indian Supreme Court Chief Justice Surya Kant publicly referred to unemployed young people as cockroaches and parasites in an offhand remark during an unrelated court hearing. The remark later saw clarification that the comments referred to people with fake degrees rather than youth generally, but the insult had already sparked a response.

From Satire to Street Protests: The Rise of the Cockroach Janata Party

Abhijeet Dipke, a 30-year-old founder based in the United States, decided to turn the insult back on its author by creating the satirical party as a play on Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s ruling Bharatiya Janata Party. Within four days, the campaign’s Instagram account drew almost 10 million followers, and within a few weeks it reached 22 million, overtaking the official account of the Bharatiya Janata Party.

Clashes in New Delhi and National Outcry

The campaign transitioned from a social media phenomenon into intense street demonstrations after activist Sonam Wangchuk staged a three-week hunger strike. Wangchuk, a prominent engineer and education activist from Ladakh, began his hunger strike at Jantar Mantar in support of students’ demands and was taken to hospital by police after 20 days, drawing further attention to the protests. Tens of thousands of demonstrators subsequently marched on Parliament in New Delhi early in the week, attempting to move beyond permitted areas despite police denying permission for the protest.

Photo: rfi.fr

Delhi Police used barricades, tear gas, and baton charges to disperse the crowds, resulting in 178 injuries, including 118 police personnel and around 60 protesters. CJP leaders alleged a harsh crackdown on students, while police said some protesters became violent and attempted to break through barricades. Images of tear gas, baton charges, and injured students spread rapidly online, prompting solidarity rallies across India and forcing the government onto the political defensive.

Core Demands and Political Fallout

The protests are primarily driven by anger over widespread unemployment and alleged exam paper leaks affecting some 2 million students, with issues frequently linked to several suicides and focused heavily on the National Eligibility cum Entrance Test, India’s medical college entrance examination. Protesters and opposition parties have demanded the resignation of Education Minister Dharmendra Pradhan, accountability for examination irregularities, reform of the education system, and compensation for families of students who allegedly died following exam-related distress.

A young woman holds an Indian flag during a Mumbai protest (July 22, 2026)
Photo: dw.com

In response to the demonstrations, Prime Minister Narendra Modi announced that fast-track courts would be set up to prosecute those behind exam paper leaks, marking his first public response after days of youth protests. However, protesters and opposition parties swiftly rejected Modi’s proposal, insisting that Pradhan must quit first. Opposition groups disrupted the monsoon session of Parliament, forcing chambers to be repeatedly suspended, while lawmakers from the Bharatiya Janata Party staged a counterprotest calling for a discussion on examination paper leaks.

Spread Across States and Future Uncertainties

While Delhi remains the nerve center of the campaign, solidarity protests have sprung up beyond New Delhi across India, with rallies and marches staged in several states and remote areas such as central Chhattisgarh.

India's youth 'cockroach' movement taking on the Modi government | 7.30

Observers and political scientists remain divided on the movement’s long-term viability and structure. Political scientist Suhas Palshikar argued that the Cockroach movement may simply provide an outlet for public anger before gradually losing steam, noting that its ideological and political character is currently fluid.

You may also like