iPhone 17 Impresses with Hardware, But iOS 26 Fuels Return to Android
Despite significant hardware upgrades, the iPhone 17’s software experience is prompting a return to Android for some users, highlighting a growing gap in features and AI capabilities.
The iPhone 17 represents a notable step forward for Apple’s entry-level devices. For years, the base iPhone has been viewed as a compromise compared to the Pro and Pro Max models, but that perception is shifting. According to one reviewer, the iPhone 17 has delivered a surprisingly impressive experience, even exceeding expectations for a phone in its price range.
Apple has addressed long-standing criticisms by incorporating previously Pro-exclusive features. These include a vibrant 120Hz ProMotion display and a larger 6.3-inch screen, alongside increased storage options. As a result, the reviewer found themselves without the usual feeling that the phone was “good, but could be better,” even when compared to devices costing upwards of $1000. While acknowledging remaining areas for improvement – namely the lack of a dedicated zoom lens and battery life – the iPhone 17 is being hailed as the most complete base-level iPhone in years.
However, the hardware improvements are overshadowed by concerns surrounding iOS 26. “Turns out it’s not the iPhone hardware that’s the problem – it’s the software,” the reviewer stated. While not dismissing iOS 26 entirely, the experience feels stagnant. The “Liquid Glass” effects are visually appealing, and the seamless integration within the Apple ecosystem remains a strong point, but the core experience hasn’t fundamentally changed. This consistency, while appreciated by some, is causing Apple to fall behind in key areas.
One of the most glaring omissions is the lack of a back swipe gesture for navigation. The Android operating system has offered this functionality for years, originating as a Huawei innovation before being adopted by Google. This simple gesture streamlines navigation, eliminating the need to awkwardly reach for on-screen buttons. Furthermore, it allows developers to create cleaner, more polished app interfaces.
The disparity extends to artificial intelligence. While Apple’s ‘Intelligence’ is present, it pales in comparison to the capabilities offered by Android. Google’s Gemini and Circle to Search, available on most 2025 Android phones, provide powerful tools for identifying objects in images, searching for information, and even generating visuals. A recent test involving identifying game developers Hideo Kojima and Sam Lake demonstrated the limitations of Siri and the integrated ChatGPT. When asked about Sam Lake’s previous work, Siri struggled and deferred to ChatGPT, which lacked the context of the initial query. In contrast, Circle to Search instantly provided a comprehensive overview of Lake’s career. “That just doesn’t happen with Circle to Search,” the reviewer noted. Apple also lags behind in AI-powered image removal and audio transcription accuracy.
Beyond these headline features, a multitude of smaller inconveniences contribute to a less fluid experience. These include the inability to automatically sign in with Google accounts, the lack of a “Force Quit” option for misbehaving apps, and compatibility issues with certain accessories. Wearables like Ray-Ban Meta glasses transfer images faster on Android thanks to Wi-Fi Direct, a technology not supported by Apple. Similarly, the reviewer experienced limited notification support for Even Realities G2 smart glasses on iOS, while enjoying full functionality on Android. The constant stream of background location permission pop-ups, while intended to protect privacy, also proved frustrating.
These cumulative issues point to a broader trend: Android offers a more customizable, capable, and fluid day-to-day experience. The reviewer concluded that these shortcomings are driving a desire to return to devices like the OnePlus 15 and Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7. “Sorry, Apple,” the reviewer stated, acknowledging the hardware improvements but ultimately finding the software experience lacking.
