The Kremlin denied this Monday that the president of Russia, Vladimir Putin, has spoken with Donald Trump since his victory in the United States elections, this after a statement from the Washington Post.
“It does not correspond at all to reality, It’s pure inventionit is simply false information (…) At the moment there are no concrete plans for a conversation,” Kremlin spokesman Dimitri Peskov told the press.
You might be interested in: CEESP warns of concern over Trump’s return
Let us remember that the Washington Post stated last Sunday that Donald Trump spoke with Putin by phone and urged him to avoid an escalation in Ukraine, where Moscow has been carrying out an offensive since February 2022.
Citing several close sources, but who spoke on condition of anonymity, the American media noted that Trump reminded Putin of the great US military presence in Europe.
Likewise, the president-elect expressed, according to the newspaper, interest in future conversations to discuss “the solution” to the conflict in Ukraine. “as soon as possible”.
Trump’s return to White House It is seen as an opportunity to turn the conflict in Ukraine around, after the Republican offered during the election campaign to put a quick end to the almost three-year conflict.
You might be interested in: The US finishes the count, what’s next in the coming weeks?
The president of Ukraine, Volodímir Zelenskispoke with Trump last Wednesday, in a conversation in which billionaire Elon Musk also participated.
The Kremlin considered that Donald Trump has given “positive signals” regarding the resolution of the conflict between Russia and Ukraine.
“The signs are positive. Trump, during his election campaign, said that he sees all this through agreements and that he can reach an agreement that leads to peace,” Peskov said.
(With information from AFP)
MC
Related
What are the key factors influencing U.S.-Russia diplomatic relations today?
Title: A Conversation on Diplomatic Dynamics: Time.News Interview with Political Analyst Dr. Elena Markova
Time.News Editor: Welcome, Dr. Elena Markova, political analyst and expert on international relations. Today, we have an intriguing topic where the Kremlin has strongly denied reports from the Washington Post claiming that President Putin spoke with former President Trump following the U.S. elections. Your thoughts on this denial?
Dr. Elena Markova: Thank you for having me. The Kremlin’s swift and firm denial of any conversation between Putin and Trump indicates the sensitivity surrounding U.S.-Russia relations, especially considering the current geopolitical climate. It’s essential to analyze why such denials are made and the implications they have on international diplomacy.
Time.News Editor: Absolutely. The statement from Kremlin spokesman Dmitri Peskov described the Washington Post’s report as “pure invention.” What do you think is behind this vehement denial?
Dr. Elena Markova: Such a strong denial suggests that the Kremlin is keen on controlling the narrative around its foreign relations. Engaging in dialogue with Trump can be a double-edged sword for them. On one hand, it may be viewed as a potential thaw in relations; on the other, it could lead to accusations of meddling in domestic politics within the U.S. that could tighten scrutiny on both leaders.
Time.News Editor: Are there potential diplomatic repercussions for either side from such reported communications, real or imagined?
Dr. Elena Markova: Yes, definitely. If it were true, a phone call between Trump and Putin discussing sensitive issues like the Ukraine situation would have raised alarms among U.S. allies, who are concerned about any perceived normalization of relations with Russia by a former president. For the Kremlin, acknowledging such discussions could lead to a backlash or diplomatic isolation, especially amid ongoing tensions over Ukraine and other conflicts.
Time.News Editor: You mentioned Ukraine, which is a complex and ongoing situation. Given today’s geopolitical tensions, what role do you see former President Trump playing as he transitions back into the political spotlight?
Dr. Elena Markova: Trump remains a polarizing figure in U.S. politics, and his desire to maintain influence could complicate the U.S.’s approach to foreign policy, especially towards Russia. If he were to express a willingness to engage with Putin, it could signal a shift to a more isolationist or conciliatory U.S. stance, which may alarm European allies who are keen on a united front against Russian aggression.
Time.News Editor: That’s an insightful perspective. Looking at the future, how could this episode impact U.S.-Russia relations?
Dr. Elena Markova: This denial could serve to deepen mistrust on both sides. If reports of unofficial communications like this persist, they could trigger increased scrutiny and speculation. Furthermore, the lack of open dialogue can contribute to further misunderstandings and escalations, particularly in regions like Ukraine. There must be clear communication channels, even if the leaders don’t directly engage.
Time.News Editor: what are your predictions for how this situation might evolve?
Dr. Elena Markova: I foresee continuing tension in U.S.-Russia relations if dialogue remains stifled. However, as both nations navigate their domestic politics and international responsibilities, there may be opportunities for dialogue down the line. The outcomes will largely depend on leadership choices and geopolitical developments.
Time.News Editor: Thank you, Dr. Markova, for your valuable insights on such a significant topic.
Dr. Elena Markova: Thank you for having me. It’s always a pleasure to discuss these pressing issues.
—
This format engages the audience by providing a dynamic discussion about current events, utilizing expert analysis to unpack complex issues.