BERN, June 15, 2025
The last of Ruag’s old Leopard 1 tanks, currently stored in northern Italy, are heading too the German armaments group rheinmetall.This ends a years-long dispute over the tanks’ ownership.
All 96 LEOPARD 1 tanks of Ruag go to Germany to the Rheinmetall Group.
Tank Tango: A Deal’s Done
After a protracted legal battle, the fate of the last Leopard 1 tanks is sealed. They’re going to Rheinmetall.
- Ruag sold the remaining 25 tanks to Rheinmetall.
- The sale of 71 tanks to rheinmetall was announced two weeks prior.
- The vehicles cannot be sent to Ukraine.
The Swiss armaments group Ruag has finally settled its dispute with the German company GLS GmbH, paving the way for the sale of its remaining Leopard 1 tanks to Rheinmetall, a German armaments group. The key point is that all the tanks, including the 25 recently approved, are not to be sent to Ukraine.
A History of steel
The story of these tanks dates back to 2016, when Ruag acquired 100 Leopard 1 tanks adn spare parts from the italian army for 4.5 million euros. Four vehicles were sold to an Italian logistics provider, while the rest remained in northern Italy.
When the war in Ukraine began, Rheinmetall aimed to purchase all the tanks, repair them, and send them to Kyiv. A contract was signed in February 2023.Though, the Federal Council prohibited the sale three months later, citing neutrality concerns.
Financial Shadows and Rising Values
The sale of 71 tanks was eventually agreed upon, with an exclusion clause preventing their transfer to Ukraine. But the question of who owned the remaining 25 tanks lingered.
In 2020, Ruag received 500 euros each from GLS.However, GLS didn’t collect the vehicles for two years.At the end of 2021, Ruag refunded the purchase price. On the same day Ruag signed the first purchase contract with Rheinmetall, GLS paid again and claimed the 25 tanks.
Now, a deal has been struck, with GLS relinquishing its claim. The financial terms of the agreement between Ruag and GLS remain undisclosed.
What has happened to the tanks?
The value of these old tanks has increased significantly as the war began. Reports indicate Denmark was prepared to buy almost 100 Leopard 1 tanks for one million euros each, a ample increase from the original price of 13,000 euros each.
More Unanswered Questions
With the sale of the 25 tanks to Rheinmetall, all 96 Leopard 1 tanks of Ruag, stored in northern Italy, are now sold. These tanks have become a burden for the federal company and have also been at the centre of a corruption scandal. A former employee allegedly built a secret trading system for spare parts.Investigations are ongoing in Germany,and Ruag filed a criminal complaint in late 2024.
Ongoing Investigations
Reports from the Federal Financial Control (EFK) in February revealed the extent of shortcomings, mismanagement, and potential criminal activity. Inspectors estimate the financial damage from the cases to be in the high double-digit millions. A Zurich law firm continues to investigate the alleged fraud cases on behalf of Ruag.
The fraud scandal has shaken confidence in the Defense Department. Left-wing parties have called for a parliamentary inquiry commission, not only due to the issues at Ruag but also concerning problems with arms procurement and IT projects. The new VBS head Martin Pfister stated he aims to restore confidence in his department. To that end,he created a new department for “planning,controlling,digitization,and security.”
Beyond the Battlefield: The Broader Implications
The Leopard 1 tank saga, while centered on military hardware adn international relations, also reflects critical issues within the defense industry. The corruption scandal at Ruag, and the subsequent calls for greater clarity, underscore the need for strong oversight and ethical practices.This situation raises questions about how defense contracts are managed. It also questions how taxpayer money is spent.
Fraud, Mismanagement, and the Erosion of Trust
The alleged fraud cases at Ruag, involving a secret trading system for spare parts, offer a stark reminder of the potential for corruption within defense organizations. The EFK’s findings,pointing to “shortcomings,mismanagement,and potential criminal activity,” further amplify the gravity of the situation.The financial damage, estimated in the tens of millions, is significant. These events erode public trust in the government and the defense sector as a whole.
The scandal reveals vulnerabilities in procurement processes. This situation illustrates the need for rigorous internal controls. A lack of compliance can lead to financial losses and reputational damage. The ongoing inquiry by a zurich law firm is crucial to uncovering the details of the fraud.It also brings any responsible individuals to justice.
Switzerland’s Neutrality under Scrutiny
switzerland’s traditional stance on neutrality complicated the Leopard 1 tank deal. The Federal Council blocked the initial sale of the tanks to Ukraine, citing neutrality concerns. This highlighted the balancing act between international obligations and long-held principles.The final decision to sell the tanks to Rheinmetall, with the condition that thay not be sent to Ukraine, reflects a cautious approach. The decision adheres to the country’s legal and international obligations.
The Role of Rheinmetall and the Future of Defense
Rheinmetall’s involvement provides a glimpse into the future of defense. They specialize in repairing, upgrading, and repurposing older military equipment. This is becoming more common as military needs evolve. The acquisition of the Leopard 1 tanks underscores this trend. The company sees opportunities in maintaining and upgrading existing hardware. The global demand for military equipment is also affected by geopolitical instability.
Key Takeaways for a Safer Market
The issues surrounding the Leopard 1 tanks offer several crucial management steps for governments and defense companies.They can use these take-aways to improve their operations.
- Enhanced Oversight: Implement stricter internal controls and auditing processes to detect and prevent financial improprieties. Self-reliant oversight bodies can help uncover potential problems. Regular external audits and transparency can enhance accountability.
- Transparency in Procurement: Increase openness in the awarding of contracts. Clearly defined procedures ensure fairness and reduce opportunities for corruption. publish contract details and prices to foster scrutiny.
- Ethical Training: Provide regular ethics training for employees at all levels. This will help build a culture of integrity and help people understand the importance of adhering to company values. Address conflicts of interest as they arise.
- Compliance Programs: Develop a robust compliance program. This can definitely help to ensure adherence to both national and international laws and regulations.
- Risk Management: Regularly assess risk and create appropriate mitigation strategies. Risk assessments should include financial, legal, and reputational areas. Proper risk management can prevent fraud and its consequences.
What is the Federal Financial Control (EFK)? It is Switzerland’s independent financial oversight body. The EFK investigates and reports on the financial management of the federal government.
What is the goal of the new department created by the new VBS head? The new department focuses on “planning, controlling, digitization, and security” to restore confidence in the swiss Defense Department. Martin Pfister aims to improve the effectiveness and reduce the risks.
Table of Contents
