“Less than 4 months for a bomb”: Ehud Yaari on the consequences of the nuclear agreement

by time news

In the shadow of the war in Ukraine, nuclear talks in Vienna are still ongoing. News commentator 12 on Arab affairs Ehud Yaari Talk about it today (Thursday) with Ben Caspit Winon MagalIn their program on 103FM, and brought further details on the progress of the nuclear deal.

In his opening remarks he said: “We are in the eighth round which is supposed to be a final round. Not sure it will be so, there are three issues there that have not yet closed as of last night. In addition, there was a leak of participants in some of the delegations yesterday. “Theirs is the most aggressive and harsh attack on the Iranians.”

Yaari added: “The participants in the talks are angry about the scope of the cancellations until they leak out in an attempt to stop. I think we have seen for some time that the Americans are willing at almost any cost to pretend to return to the 2015 agreement. “They are ready to make an arrangement regarding the removal of the sanctions on the Revolutionary Guards themselves.”

He said the removal of sanctions this time would be several times more extensive than in 2015: “To pretend to return to the agreement, they (the Americans) are willing to do anything for the Iranians, to make some sort of arrangement to lift the sanctions on the Revolutionary Guards themselves. Abu Dhabi and Saudi Arabia and Iraq and Syria and Lebanon, wherever you want.There is no other way to explain this, because these sanctions do not concern the nuclear issue at all and were not part of the lifting of sanctions at the time in 2015. In the operational sense, the time Iran needs to get enough bomb-enriched material “First, it shortens, changes – as Obama claimed – to four months or less, and it will get even shorter in the next two or three years.”

On the United States’ exit from the agreement, during Donald Trump’s tenure, Yaari said that if the former president had continued for another term, it would have become effective. “To say today in retrospect that in the first place it was wrong, I’m not sure,” he stated.

  • Along with the decrease in morbidity: fear of the spread of a new variant in Israel

Yaari added: “I do not look at everything through the prism of Bibi-not Bibi. What changes the spirit of the talks is what the Mossad did when it segmented the Iranian nuclear archive from Tehran, why? Because Israel presented to everyone, there is no denying it, the evidence for military activity. “Iranian even after they claimed to have stopped. And today when the French stand on their hind legs in Vienna in front of the Americans, and say, ‘We need to demand clarification on these issues that came up from the nuclear archive to the end, it’s for me Israel on the field.”

In the commentator’s opinion, if it is finally signed, it will be “an agreement several times worse than the agreement was, the removal of the sanctions is wholesale and I did not see Israel playing it right either. There are important forces in America that oppose the wholesale removal of the sanctions.”

He later commented on the Israeli government’s mediation efforts between Russia and Ukraine: “The prime minister pretends to be involved in mediation between Ukraine and Russia and for that I say ‘oh really.’ “.

On the conduct of the Israeli government, he said: “Israel is not in the game. Sending middle-ranking officials to Vienna to hear what they agree to say to them. It’s not too much. Not players on this pitch. ”

He added: “In order to mediate between Ukraine and Russia, we need to bring back Angela Merkel from her vacation or recruit Finnish President Ninista, who is a good friend of both Putin and Zanelsky. At another level it will not go. “Some of them with Israeli passports who want to arrive now.”

Assisted in the preparation of the article: Amitai Duak, 103fm

You may also like

Leave a Comment