Teh rude attitude he addressed too the PRO in the Clean File debate was not enough for Javier Milei: a group of his deputies, many of whom had initially supported their allies’ project, were absent on the day of the vote.He left Macrismo cycling for air. Another time. But a week later, the President doubled his bet. “If before we didn’t think about negotiating, now that the results are consistent, they are even less so,” he ventured at a libertarian congress. He blew up bridges.
Macrismo underlines that, in their personal relationship, Milei is very respectful of Mauricio. But the former president has grown tired of what he sees as government mistreatment. TOBefore they ignored him, now they betrayed him directly. It will be harder to digest.
Anger.
The fever of Macri It was so big that, a week after the defeat against Ficha Clean, it continued to have the President’s disloyalty as the main topic of some of it’s meetings.
The back and forth reached its peak with an exchange of statements, after La Libertad Avanza made eight deputies absent and, with this, left Cristina Kirchner the possibility of competing in the 2025 elections.. “the government has decided to stay on the other side,” read PRO’s letter. And he completes: “We have an enormous institutional responsibility that we will honor. “We will not remain silent when it plays to the corrupt.”
The party in power did not stand idly by. AnswerThe result was harsh: “During the government of Mauricio Macri, no Clean Record project was discussed,” they wrote. And they concluded: “The greatest defender of the privileges in the Senate of the now condemned Cristina has been proposed as a candidate for deputy. Opportunism as an instrument of political action is repugnant.” The topic has been repeated by many leaders,but not by the President,who usually shares everything on social networks. He preferred to let the party’s letter pass.
Even in the face of Milei’s betrayal, the PRO does not deviate from his intentions. In the party they assure that they will continue to support what helps to straighten the economic path and that they will insist on their agenda. But they have understood that there is a political rival in front of them that they have underestimated: in the Casa Rosada they are not willing to give him even a shred of their power.
Elections.
The official betrayal was a wake-up call for Macri. Can the assembly of the lists be negotiated with Milei, her sister Karina and Santiago Caputo? The answer they give is obvious: no. But the former president is in a labyrinth: no path gives him absolute certainty. If he leads the PRO alone, or revives a coalition with some of his old Together for Change allies, he fears he will founder in third place, behind La Libertad Avanza and Peronismo in most districts. If he accompanies the ruling party, he will once again be subjected to mistreatment by the libertarians.
From the beginning of his mandate, Macri understood that his obstacle was not Milei, but Karina and Caputo. “Mauricio reaches an understanding with Javier, but then the iron triangle turns the tables,” says a PRO leader. And the president’s sister is the head of the assembly for the legislative elections. This is why “plan A” for 2025 is not an agreement.
Indeed,many leaders suggest that Macri,once again,wear the candidate’s hat. “Mauricio doesn’t like Congress,but we will need it to avoid losing in the capital”,analyze importent party figures.
Macri says nothing. At their table they ask for moderation and assure that there are many problems to be solved before diving headlong into the electoral question.But some leaders are starting to ask for definitions: they fear that the former president’s indecision will push them to the bottom. the government has already warned that it will do everything. And he doesn’t mind betraying his legislative allies to suit his needs.
In this note
What is the meaning of the “Clean File” debate in Argentina’s current political landscape?
Time.news Interview: Navigating Political Tension in Argentina
Editor (Emily Chen): Welcome to Time.news, were we discuss the pressing issues influencing global economies and societies. Today, we have with us Dr. Sofia Ramirez,a political analyst and expert in Argentine politics. Thank you for joining us, Dr. Ramirez.
Dr. Sofia Ramirez: Thank you for having me, Emily. It’s a pleasure to be here.
Emily Chen: Let’s dive right in. The recent dynamics between Javier Milei’s management and mauricio Macri have stirred quite a conversation. Can you provide some context about the “Clean File” debate and it’s implications?
Dr. Sofia Ramirez: Absolutely. The “Clean File” debate was pivotal in showcasing the fractures within the ruling coalition. Initially, some deputies aligned with Milei supported the project, but when it came time to vote, many were absent, indicating a lack of unity and perhaps a silent protest against Milei’s increasingly abrasive governance style. this has meaningful implications as it suggests a growing rift that could destabilize the current administration.
Emily Chen: It certainly sounds like a critical point. Milei seemed to double down on his approach, stating, “If before we didn’t think about negotiating, now that the results are consistent, thay are even less so.” How does this reflect his political strategy moving forward?
Dr. Sofia Ramirez: It signifies his intent to govern without the conventional negotiations that defined previous administrations. Milei appears to be relying more on ideological purity and loyalty from his supporters rather than fostering collaboration. This could energize his base but also alienate key players, particularly former allies like Macri, creating an unpredictable political landscape.
Emily Chen: Speaking of Macri, his feelings of betrayal seem to run deep. You mentioned that he feels mistreated by the current administration. How do you see this personal relationship affecting broader political dynamics in Argentina?
Dr. Sofia ramirez: Macri’s growing dissatisfaction could lead to a backlash not only against Milei but also within the wider political sphere. While there may be a facade of respect between them, the underlying tensions can undermine coalition stability. If Macri chooses to rally his supporters and dissenters, we could witness a significant shift in the opposition that might challenge Milei’s governance.
Emily Chen: It sounds like Macri’s discontent is more than just personal; it could signal a larger movement. Do you think this change in sentiment could lead to an organized opposition?
Dr. Sofia Ramirez: Definitely. Macri is a key player with a substantial following.If he capitalizes on the feelings of betrayal and resentment, it could spark a rebirth of the opposition. There’s also the potential for emerging political factions that may unite under the banner of discontent towards Milei’s administration, complicating the political calculus for all involved.
Emily Chen: what are the potential outcomes of this growing divide? Could it lead to early elections or a reshuffling of political alliances?
Dr. Sofia Ramirez: It’s quite possible. If the rift widens and Milei fails to maintain control over his coalition, we could see calls for early elections or realignments within the political spectrum. Moreover, if Macri and other disaffected politicians successfully form a cohesive front, it could create significant pressure on the current administration, prompting them to reconsider their strategy or even their leadership.
emily Chen: Thank you,Dr. ramirez, for your insightful analysis. The political landscape in Argentina is certainly evolving, and your expertise sheds light on the complexities at play. We’ll keep a close eye on the developments as they unfold.
Dr. Sofia Ramirez: Thank you, emily. It was great to be here and discuss these critical issues.
Emily chen: And thank you to our audience for tuning in. Stay with Time.news for the latest updates and in-depth analysis.
