Criticism Mounts as Podcast Host Faces Backlash Over Running Performance Standards
A sports science expert is challenging recent comments made by a popular podcast host, arguing that setting arbitrary performance benchmarks discourages participation and fuels unhealthy pressure within the running community.
The debate ignited following statements made by Mads Hansen in the Spårtskluben podcast earlier this fall, where he suggested individuals should meet a certain level of achievement – specifically, running a mile in under 30 minutes – before sharing their training results. The clip quickly gained traction on social media, prompting widespread reaction and, now, pointed criticism.
The Problem with Performance Gatekeeping
Lea Steen, who holds a master’s degree in sports science, argues Hansen’s comments were a “disc boom,” and actively detrimental to fostering a welcoming environment for runners of all levels. “If there is one thing we should cheer for and normalize, then it is people sharing their training journey regardless of level,” Steen wrote in a recent chronicle. “This lowers the shame and inspires more.”
Steen acknowledges Hansen’s tendency to provoke discussion, but emphasizes the potential harm of his message. While recognizing the humor in highlighting the contrast between expensive training regimes and modest results, she contends the impact extends beyond those focused on elite performance. “By ridiculing ‘regular’ training performance, you help increase the performance pressure, as well as make the threshold higher for those on the starting line,” she explains.
Social Media & The Pressure to Perform
The rise of running as a popular activity, fueled by social media content showcasing routines, equipment, and personal bests, has created a complex landscape. Steen’s research into training pressure, body image, and social media use among young people revealed a concerning trend.
“The use of social media is growing, and the youth consider the platforms to be good sources of entertainment, information and inspiration,” Steen notes. However, she also highlights a pervasive sense of comparison. As one student she interviewed stated, “Even if you don’t want to, you compare yourself.” This comparison, Steen warns, can contribute to body image issues and unhealthy training practices.
The potential for a skewed perception of reality is significant. Steen poses a critical question: “What if it was only those who run the mile in under 30 who shared?” The absence of relatable role models, she argues, stifles motivation and discourages participation.
Encouragement Over Exclusion
Steen’s central argument is a call for inclusivity and encouragement. “Therefore, the goal should be clear: encourage, inspire and give people running pleasure, not ridicule those who do,” she asserts. She directly addresses those considering starting a fitness journey, emphasizing that running a mile in under 30 minutes is neither typical nor expected.
“Everyone starts somewhere,” Steen writes. “Choose the form of activity that gives you joy, everything must not be measured. And if you want to share: Do it. We need more like you. We need runefluencers at all levels. We need more of those who share their first jogs. You inspire more than you think.”
This chronicle, expressing Steen’s perspective, is available for submission to [email protected]. The Young Opinions project receives funding from the Tinius Foundation.
