Manhattan DA Urges Mark Zuckerberg to Combat Immigration Scams on Meta Platforms

by priyanka.patel tech editor

Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg is calling on Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg to take aggressive action to stop immigration scams on Facebook and WhatsApp, warning that “imposter accounts” are systematically targeting vulnerable immigrants. In a letter sent Thursday, Bragg detailed how bad actors are impersonating legal professionals and legitimate organizations to defraud individuals of tens of thousands of dollars.

The move signals a growing trend of New York City prosecutors attempting to hold social media giants accountable for public safety crises. By leveraging the platforms’ reach, scammers are creating sophisticated facades—often using the logos of real pro bono legal services—to convince victims to send money under the guise of securing legal assistance or immigration status.

According to the District Attorney’s office, these fraudulent schemes are not merely a violation of Meta’s terms of service, which prohibit misleading or fraudulent conduct, but are active criminal enterprises. Despite the existence of reporting tools for impersonation, Bragg claims the company has failed to act on specific warnings from legal organizations.

“Facebook specifically provides an option for reporting what it describes as ‘impersonating profiles,’” Bragg wrote. “But, we have spoken with at least two institutional leaders of pro bono legal services organizations whose requests to remove false profiles were declined despite following this reporting protocol.”

The Mechanics of the Immigration Fraud

The scams typically follow a pattern of high-credibility impersonation. Bad actors create profiles that mirror the branding of established immigration law firms or non-profit legal clinics. Once trust is established through these visual cues, the scammers solicit payments for services that are never rendered, targeting people who may be unfamiliar with the U.S. Legal system or who are desperate for legitimate counsel.

Bragg’s office emphasizes that the financial impact is severe, with victims losing tens of thousands of dollars. To combat this, the DA has proposed a series of specific technical and policy interventions for Meta, including:

  • Enhanced Reporting: Streamlining the process for law enforcement agencies to report accounts engaged in criminal activity.
  • Preventative Suspensions: Temporarily suspending accounts that are alleged to have committed a crime while investigations are pending.
  • Geographic Verification: Implementing checks to ensure that users claiming to represent legal service providers are actually located within the geographic region of those organizations.

The New York Immigration Coalition, a nonprofit advocacy group, has voiced support for the DA’s initiative. Murad Awawdeh, the organization’s president and CEO, stated Friday that Meta and other platforms must take more responsibility to protect users from exploitation. Awawdeh also stressed that the city must continue to invest in bona fide legal services to provide a safe alternative to these fraudulent offers.

A Broader Pattern of Prosecutor Pressure

Bragg’s outreach to Zuckerberg is part of a wider effort by New York City officials to treat social media platforms as critical infrastructure for public safety. This follows a similar push by Bronx District Attorney Darcel Clark, who recently urged several tech firms to help curb “takeovers” of public spaces by teenagers—events often coordinated via social media content.

The contrast in corporate responses has been notable. While Meta has not yet responded to inquiries from the DA’s office or requests for a meeting, other platforms have engaged with the Bronx DA’s office. TikTok has reportedly met with Clark to discuss amplifying positive gatherings over risky behavior, and Snapchat provided a detailed letter explaining its policies against promoting dangerous activities.

The disparity in responses highlights the tension between the “black box” of social media moderation and the immediate, real-world needs of local law enforcement. For prosecutors, the inability to quickly remove a known fraudulent account represents a systemic failure that enables crime to scale faster than traditional policing can keep up.

Comparative Response to Local Prosecution Requests

Responses of Social Media Firms to NYC DA Requests
Platform Action Taken Outcome/Status
TikTok Met with Bronx DA Committed to promoting positive gatherings
Snapchat Written Response Outlined policies against dangerous activity
Meta No Response Meeting request from Manhattan DA pending

How to Identify and Report Immigration Scams

As part of this effort, the Manhattan District Attorney’s office is launching a public awareness campaign to help New Yorkers identify red flags. Legal experts warn that any “lawyer” or “agency” requesting payment via untraceable methods—such as gift cards, cryptocurrency, or direct wire transfers to personal accounts—is likely a scammer.

The DA’s office has established dedicated channels for reporting this specific type of fraud. New Yorkers who suspect they have been targeted can contact the Manhattan DA’s Immigrant Affairs Unit via the following methods:

  • Phone: 212-335-3600
  • WhatsApp: 347-371-0877

The urgency of these measures is underscored by the fact that immigrants, particularly those with precarious legal status, may be hesitant to report crimes to the police for fear of deportation, making them prime targets for predators who exploit that fear.

Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Individuals seeking immigration assistance should contact a licensed attorney or a certified non-profit legal service provider.

The next step in this process depends on Meta’s willingness to engage. The DA’s office is currently awaiting a response to the request for a formal meeting to establish a more efficient pipeline for account removal and criminal reporting. Until then, the Manhattan DA’s office will continue its public awareness campaign to warn potential victims.

Do you have experience with these platforms’ reporting tools? Share your thoughts in the comments or share this article to help warn others.

You may also like

Leave a Comment