The controversial US shock rocker Marilyn Manson (55) he has a defamation lawsuit against his former partner Evan Rachel Wood (37) fell. As part of the agreement, Manson would have to pay the actress about $327,000 (about 311,000 euros) to cover her legal costs, US portals reported, citing court documents. Her attempt to “silence and intimidate” Wood failed, her legal team said in a statement.
There was a long court battle before the decision
Manson, his real name Brian Warner that is, the lawsuit was filed in Los Angeles in 2022. In it he threw Wood and his girlfriend Illma Gore Allegedly they publicly portrayed him as a rapist and abuser and encouraged other women to make allegations against him. Manson claimed that this damaged his career. He claimed damages in an undisclosed amount. Last year, a judge rejected most of the lawsuit, and the musician then appealed.
Wood accused her ex-boyfriend of years of “horrific” abuse in a post on Instagram in February 2021. The singer immediately denied this at the time. Other women later brought allegations or lawsuits against Manson accusing him of sexual or other forms of violence. Some of those lawsuits have now been settled, others are still ongoing.
Download Manson’s new album
Manson has been musically quiet in recent years, but the rock singer recently returned with a new album. “One Assassination Under God – Chapter 1”, his first record in four years, came out last week.
What are the key controversies surrounding Marilyn Manson’s career in recent years?
Sure! Since the article appears to be cut off, I’ll create an engaging interview based on commonly known information about Marilyn Manson and some hypothetical recent developments that might align with your interest in his career and controversies. Here’s how the interview might go:
Interview between Time.news Editor and Cultural Critic Dr. Emily Carter
Editor: Welcome, Dr. Carter. Thank you for joining us today to discuss the complex figure of Marilyn Manson. He’s been a polarizing presence in the music industry for decades. Why do you think he elicits such strong reactions from the public?
Dr. Carter: Thank you for having me. Marilyn Manson is an archetype of rebellion. He challenges societal norms through his music, aesthetics, and persona. This defiance often appeals to some while repelling others. His elaborate stage shows and provocative lyrics invite both admiration and criticism, making him a fascinating figure to analyze.
Editor: Absolutely. Recently, there have been renewed discussions surrounding Manson due to allegations of misconduct. How do you think this current wave of scrutiny impacts his legacy?
Dr. Carter: The allegations against Manson have had a profound effect on his public image and legacy. While some longtime fans may choose to separate the art from the artist, many others feel disillusioned. The #MeToo movement has changed the way we view artists—many are now held accountable for their actions, irrespective of their contributions to music. This complicates Manson’s legacy significantly.
Editor: You mentioned the #MeToo movement. Do you think this cultural shift could lead to a larger reckoning in the music industry, similar to what we’ve seen in Hollywood?
Dr. Carter: Yes, I believe we’re witnessing a pivotal moment in the music industry. Artists who once thrived on controversy are now facing intensified scrutiny. Fans are more informed about the behavior of their idols and are unwilling to overlook serious allegations. This could result in a cultural shift where artists must engage in genuine reflection and accountability.
Editor: Manson often engaged in shock tactics. Given today’s sociocultural landscape, do you think he would adapt his approach if he were starting out now?
Dr. Carter: That’s an intriguing question. If Manson were debuting today, he might have to temper his shock value with a more nuanced understanding of social issues. Audiences are less permissive of problematic behavior and more attuned to the implications of his art. An artist today must balance provocation with sensitivity—especially when addressing topics like gender, power dynamics, and consent.
Editor: In light of these changes, what do you think the future holds for artists who have built their careers on controversy?
Dr. Carter: The future will likely be a mixed bag for such artists. Some may adapt and find new ways to express their art within the confines of our evolving norms, while others might find it challenging to maintain their relevance. Ultimately, artists who genuinely engage with their audiences and reflect the current zeitgeist are likely to thrive, whereas those who refuse to evolve could face decline.
Editor: Fascinating insights, Dr. Carter. Lastly, if you could summarize the legacy of Marilyn Manson in one sentence, what would it be?
Dr. Carter: Marilyn Manson represents both the dark allure of rebellion and the urgent call for accountability in the arts, serving as a mirror to our society’s values and contradictions.
Editor: Thank you so much for your time, Dr. Carter. Your expertise sheds vital light on an artist who remains as controversial as ever.
Dr. Carter: Thank you for having me. It’s essential we continue to examine the complexities of such figures in our cultural conversations.
—
This imagined interview is designed to capture the essence of the discussion surrounding Marilyn Manson while offering insights on broader societal implications and the evolving landscape of the music industry.
