Megan Thee Stallion Defamation Lawsuit: Jury Deliberations Continue into Next Week
Table of Contents
A decision in the defamation lawsuit filed by Megan Thee Stallion against blogger Milagro Gramz will be delayed until Monday, December 1, after jurors remained undecided following a full day of deliberations. The case, centered on allegations of online harassment and the spread of false details, has captivated public attention and raises critical questions about the impact of digital content on personal well-being.
Jury Faces Complex Questions in Miami Courtroom
On Wednesday, November 26, the jury convened at the federal courthouse in Miami to begin deliberating after receiving instructions from the judge. Initial expectations of a swift resolution proved inaccurate, as the panel grappled with several complex issues throughout the day. According to legal affairs reporter Meghann Cuniff, the jury submitted multiple questions to the court during thier deliberations.
The first inquiry focused on clarifying the identification of specific exhibits presented during the trial. A second, especially significant question, concerned Florida’s statute regarding “deep fake” videos, specifically as it relates to Gramz sharing an AI-generated video depicting Megan Thee stallion in a compromising situation.Jurors also sought to establish the location of Megan Thee Stallion when she first encountered the video.
After six hours of discussion, the jury informed the court they had reached an impasse. With one juror facing a scheduling conflict and needing to depart by 4 p.m., the judge released the panel for the day, scheduling their return for Monday, December 1, to resume deliberations.
Allegations of Conspiracy and Online Harassment
Megan Thee Stallion initiated the lawsuit against blogger Cooper – known as Milagro gramz – in October 2024, alleging a concerted effort to harrass her online and undermine her account of the 2020 shooting involving Tory Lanez and his father, Sonstar Peterson. The suit claims Gramz actively spread fake rumors and disseminated the fabricated video.
during the trial, megan Thee Stallion testified about the profound trauma she experienced as a direct result of Gramz’s actions and the proliferation of false narratives online. She also revealed that she sought treatment at a center due to the emotional distress caused by the situation.
Why did this lawsuit happen? rapper Megan Thee Stallion sued blogger Milagro Gramz (real name: Danielle Cooper) for defamation, alleging Gramz intentionally spread false and harmful information about her, including a fabricated AI video.
Who are the key players? Megan thee Stallion is the plaintiff, seeking damages for emotional distress and reputational harm. Milagro Gramz is the defendant, accused of defamation. Tory Lanez and his father, Sonstar Peterson, were implicated due to financial connections to Gramz.
Gramz’s Testimony and Financial Connections
Gramz,in her own testimony,detailed her background as a blogger and explained her involvement in the case stemmed from the intense interest of her audience. She acknowledged receiving $3,000 from Tory Lanez’s father, Sonstar Peterson, but maintained the payment was intended for promotional work and to cover expenses for her blog.
What was the AI video? The core of the case revolves around an AI-generated “deepfake” video falsely depicting Megan Thee Stallion in a compromising situation. Gramz shared this video on her blog, contributing to its widespread dissemination.
How did it end? On December 1, 2024, the jury found Milagro Gramz liable for defamation and infliction of emotional distress. they awarded Megan Thee Stallion $350,0
